Abstract
In the twentieth century, science and art had a grand paradigmatic shift each other. This study aims at comparing the epistemologies of surrealism and quantum mechanics that emerged in the 1930s and interpreting the paintings from a physical viewpoint, with a focus on the Copenhagen interpretation. In terms of epistemologies, the arbitrary relationship between an object and an image advocated by Magritte may correspond to the indeterminacy between physical entities and measurement. This study analysed the paintings of Magritte from the point of view of the features of the Copenhagen interpretation categories of wave–particle duality, indeterminacy, probabilistic interpretation and quantum hypothesis. Based on such discussions, this study gives some implications for enhancing creativity through an interdisciplinary approach.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allday, J. (2009). Quantum reality: Theory and philosophy. New York: CRC Press.
Auletta, G. (2001). Foundations interpretation of quantum mechanics. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co.
Babette, B., & Saslow, J. M. (2013). A companion to Renaissance to Baroque art. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bohr, N. (1958). Atomic physics and human knowledge. New York: Wiley.
Camilleri, K. (2009). A history of entanglement: Decoherence and the interpretation problem. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 40(4), 290–302.
Chipp, H. B. (1996). Theories of modern art: A source book by artists and critics. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Choi, J.-M. (2004). (The) virtuality of Rene Magritte’s depaysement. Seoul, Korea: Hongik University.
Cramer, J. G. (2016). The quantum handshake: Entanglement, nonlocality and transactions. Dordrecht: Springer.
Criminisi, A., Kemp, M., & Kang, S. B. (2004). Reflections of reality in Jan van Eyck and Robert Campin. Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, 37(3), 109–121.
D’Alessandro, S., Draguet, M., & Goormans, C. (2013). Magritte: the mystery of the ordinary, 1926–1938. New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
Ferguson, K. (2002). Tycho and Kepler: The unlikely partnership that forever changed our understanding of the heavens. New York: Walker & Company.
Gablik, S. (1985). Magritte. London: Thames & Hudson.
Gohr, S. (2009). Magritte: Attempting the impossible. New York: Distributed Art Publishers.
Gombrich, E. H. (2006). The story of art. New York: Phaidon Press.
Griffiths, D. J. (2013). Revolutions in twentieth-century physics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Guilemin, R. (2010). Similarities and contrasts in the creative processes of the science and the arts. Leonardo, 43(1), 59–62.
Hartmann, N. (2014). Aesthetics. New York: De Gruyter.
Heisenberg, W. (1927). Über den anschaulichen inhalt der quantentheoretischen kinematik und mechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 43(3–4), 172–198.
Heisenberg, W. (1949). The physical principles of the quantum theory (C. Eckart & F. C. Hoyt, Trans.). Mineola, NY: Dover Publications Inc.
Heisenberg, W. (1955). The development of the interpretation of quantum theory. In W. Pauli, L. Rosenfeld, & V. Weisskopf (Eds.), Niels Bohr and the development of physics. New York: McGraw Hill.
Høffding, H. (1905). The problems of philosophy. New York: Macmillan.
Høffding, H. (1955). A history of modern philosophy: A sketch of the history of philosophy from the close of the Renaissance to our own day (B. E. Meyer, Trans.). New York: Dover Publications.
Houston, K. (2012). Introduction to art criticism: Histories, strategies, voices. New York: Pearson.
Hughes, R. (2008). Magritte (N. Park, Trans.). Seoul: Maronie Books.
James, W. (1950). The principles of psychology. New York: Dover Publications.
Jammer, M. (1989). The conceptual development of quantum mechanics. Los Angeles, CA: Tomash Publishers.
Jho, H. (2014). Implications of science education as interdisciplinary education through the cases of scientists and artists in the modern era: Focus on the relationship between science and the arts. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(8), 755–765.
Kang, O.-M. (2007). (A) study on depaysement techniques of Rene Magritte’s work. Seoul: Hongik University.
Kemp, M. (1990). The science of art: Optical themes in western art from Brunelleschi to Seurat. London: Yale University Press.
Longair, M. (2006). Revolutions in music and physics, 1900–30. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 31(3), 275–288.
Lopes, D. (1996). Understanding pictures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lützen, J. (2007). The geometry of an art: The history of the mathematical theory of perspective from Alberti to Monge. New York: Springer.
Massey, L. (2003). The treatise on perspective: Published and unpublished. Washington, D.C.: Yale University Press.
McAllister, J. W. (1996). Beauty & revolution in science. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Miller, A. I. (1995). Aesthetics, representation and creativity in art and science. Leonardo, 28(3), 185–192.
Miller, A. I. (1996). Insights of genius: Imagery and creativity in science and art. New York: Copernicus.
Murdoch, D. (1990). Niels Bohr’s philosophy of physics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Park, J.-J. (2011). Magritte and simulacre. Seoul: Giparang Pub.
Pauli, W. (Ed.). (1994). Writings on physics and philosophy. Berlin: Springer.
Plotnitsky, A. (2006). Reading Bohr: Physics and philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.
Plotnitsky, A. (2016). The principles of quantum theory, from Planck’s quanta to the Higgs boson: The nature of quantum reality and the spirit of Copenhagen. Switzerland: Springer.
Rooney, K., & Plattner, E. (Eds.). (2016). René Magritte: Selected writings. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1999). Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of the world’s most creative people. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Schmitt, C. B. (1981). Studies in Renaissance philosophy and science. London: Variorum Reprints.
Schrödinger, E. (1926a). Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem. Annalen der Physik, 384(6), 489–527.
Schrödinger, E. (1926b). Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem. Annalen der Physik, 384(4), 361–376.
Schrödinger, E. (1926c). Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem. Annalen der Physik, 386(18), 109–139.
Schrödinger, E. (1926d). Über das Verhältnis der Heisenberg-Born-Jordanschen Quantenmechanik zu der meinem. Annalen der Physik, 384(8), 734–756.
Shapin, S. (1994). A social history of truth: Civility and science in the seventeenth-century England. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Shirley, J. W., & Hoeniger, D. (1985). Science and the arts in the Renaissance. Washington, DC: Folger Shakesphere Library.
Sim, M.-S. (2004). The educational implication of Kierkegaard’s existential single individual. The Korea Educational Review, 10(2), 5–35.
Snow, C. P. (1998). Two cultures. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stonlitz, J. (1960). Aesthetics and philosophy of art criticism: A critical introduction. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
van der Veen, J. (2012). Draw your physics homework? Art as a path to understanding in physics teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 356–407.
Vitz, P. C., & Glimcher, A. B. (1984). Modern art and modern science: The parallel analysis of vision. New York: Praeger.
Wear, D., & Zarconi, J. (2011). The treachery of images: How René Magritte informs medical education. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26(4), 437–439.
Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Wittgenstein, L. (1978). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). London: Basil Blackwell & Mott.
Zucker, M. (2013). Iconography in Renaissance and Baroque art. In B. Bohn & J. M. Saslow (Eds.), A companion to Renaissance and Baroque art (pp. 359–380). Oxford: Wiley.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean Government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2017R1C1B1007561).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jho, H. Interdisciplinary Approach to Combine Science and Art: Understanding of the Paintings of René Magritte from the Viewpoint of Quantum Mechanics. Found Sci 24, 527–540 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-019-09600-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-019-09600-z