Foundations of Science

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 269–274 | Cite as

A Non-confrontational Art of Living in the Technosphere and Infosphere

Article
  • 105 Downloads

Abstract

Several trends in contemporary philosophy have revived the question of the good life. This article addresses the more elaborate notion of an “art of living” in the specific context of the technosphere on the basis of recent works in philosophy of technology. It also brings ideas from Asian philosophy and from Buddhism in particular into the discussion. The focus is on the notion of non-confrontation, which could lead to a decisive change in the methods and scope of technology assessment within the humanities. The art of living in the technosphere emerges as an existential virtuosity that pertains to practical wisdom.

Keywords

Technology Ethics Confrontation Good life Buddhism Wisdom 

References

  1. Benkler, Y. (2011). The penguin and the leviathan: How cooperation triumphs over self-interest. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  2. Boyd D. M. (2008). Taken out of context: American teen sociality in networked publics. PhD, University of California, Berkeley. http://www.danah.org/papers/TakenOutOfContext.pdf.
  3. Brey, P., Briggle, A., & Spence, E. (Eds.). (2012). The good life in a technological age. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Dorrestijn, S. (2012). The design of our own lives: Technical mediation and subjectivation after Foucault. University of Twente, PhD Thesis, October 2012. http://members.tele2.nl/s.dorrestijn/downloads/Dorrestijn_Design_our_own_lives.pdf.
  5. Foucault, M. (2001). L’herméneutique du sujet. Cours au Collège de France (19811982). Paris: Gallimard/Seuil.Google Scholar
  6. Harvey, P. (2000). An introduction to Buddhist ethics: Foundations, values and issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hershock, P. D. (1999). Reinventing the wheel: A Buddhist response to the information age. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hershock, P. D. (2006). Buddhism in the public sphere: Reorienting global interdependence. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Hursthouse, R. (1999). On virtue ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Naess, A. (2010). The ecology of wisdom (Writings, ed. Alan Drengson, Bill Devall). Counterpoint U.S.Google Scholar
  11. Spence, Edward. H. (2011). Information, knowledge and wisdom: Groundwork for the normative evaluation of digital information and its relation to the good life. Ethics and Information Technology, 13(3), 271–275.Google Scholar
  12. Swierstra, T., & Waelbers, K. (2010). Designing a good life: A matrix for the technological mediation of morality. Science and engineering ethics, Nov. 2010. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9251-1
  13. Tiberius, V. (2008). The reflective life: Living wisely within our limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ueshiba, M. (2007). The art of peace, translated and edited by John Stevens. Boston and London: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  15. Van Den Eede, Y. (2012). Amor technologiae: Marshall McLuhan as philosopher of technology—Towards a philosophy of human–media relationships. Brussels: VUB Press.Google Scholar
  16. Varela Francisco, J. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom, and cognition. Redwood: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Verbeek, P.-P. (2013). Resistance is futile: Toward a non-modern democratization of technology. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 17(1), 72–92.Google Scholar
  19. Wu, T. (2011). The master switch: The rise and fall of information empires. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  20. Zittrain, J. (2009). The future of the Internet: And how to stop it. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Paris-Sorbonne UniversityParisFrance

Personalised recommendations