Science, Respect for Nature, and Human Well-Being: Democratic Values and the Responsibilities of Scientists Today
- 545 Downloads
The central question addressed is: How should scientific research be conducted so as to ensure that nature is respected and the well being of everyone everywhere enhanced? After pointing to the importance of methodological pluralism for an acceptable answer and to obstacles posed by characterizing scientific methodology too narrowly, which are reinforced by the ‘commercial-scientific ethos’, two additional questions are considered: How might research, conducted in this way, have impact on—and depend on—strengthening democratic values and practices? And: What is thereby implied for the responsibilities of scientists today?
KeywordsSustainability Human well-being Neutrality Impartiality Commercial-scientific ethos Responsibilities of scientists
Context-sensitive strategies: strategies that are not reducible to DSs.
Decontextualizing strategies: under which, admissible theories are constrained so that they can represent phenomena and encapsulate their possibilities in terms of how they are related to underlying structures and their components, process and interactions, and the laws that govern them; and empirical data are selected, and reported using descriptive categories that are generally quantitative, and applicable in virtue of measurement, instrumental and experimental operations. Representing phenomena in this way dissociates them from their context.
- Altieri, M. A. (1995). Agroecology: The science of sustainable agriculture. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
- Bordieu, P. (2004). Science of science and reflexivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- COMEST—World Commission on the Ethics of Science and Technology. (2005). The Precautionary Principle. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
- De Schutter, O. (2010). Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development, Report of the UNESCO Special Rapporteur on the right to food, http://www.srfood.org/images/stories/pdf/officialreports/20110308_a-hrc-16-49_agroecology_en.pdf. Accessed November 5, 2012.
- Douglas, H. E. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
- Elliott, K. (2011). Is a little pollution good for you? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Krimsky, S. (2003). Science in the private interest. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Lacey, H. (1999). Is science value free? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Lacey, H. (2005). Values and objectivity in science. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Lacey, H. (2013). Rehabilitating neutrality. Philosophical Studies, 162, 77–83.Google Scholar
- Lacey, H. (forthcoming a). On the co-unfolding of scientific knowledge and viable values. In P. E. Bour, G. Heinzmann, W. Hodges & P. Schroeder-Heister (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th congress of logic, methodology and philosophy of science. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
- Lacey, H. (forthcoming b). Views of scientific methodology as sources of ignorance in the controversies about transgenic crops. Prepared for a book, edited by J. Kourany & M. Carrier, tentatively entitled Agnotology: Ways of producing, preserving, and dealing with ignorance.Google Scholar
- Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Merton, R. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Nordmann, A., & Radder, H. (Eds.). (2011). Science transformed? Debating claims of an epochal break. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Oliveira, M. B. (2013). On the commodification of science: The programmatic dimension. Science & Education, 22, 2463–2483.Google Scholar
- Radder, H. (2010). The commodification of academic research. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.Google Scholar
- Tickner, J. A. (2003). Environmental science and preventive public policy. Washington: Island Press.Google Scholar