Abstract
The article investigates the role of symbolic means of knowledge representation in concept development using the historical example of medieval diagrams of change employed in early modern work on the motion of fall. The parallel cases of Galileo Galilei, Thomas Harriot, and René Descartes and Isaac Beeckman are discussed. It is argued that the similarities concerning the achievements as well as the shortcomings of their respective work on the motion of fall can to a large extent be attributed to their shared use of means of knowledge representation handed down from antiquity and the Middle Ages. While the interpretation of medieval diagrams was unproblematic in the scholastic context from which they arose, in the early modern context, which was characterized by the confluence of natural philosophy and practical mathematics, it became ambiguous. It was the early modern mathematicians’ work within this contradictory framework that brought about a new conceptualization of motion which, in particular, eventually led to an infinitesimal concept of velocity. In this process, the diagrams themselves remained largely unchanged and thus functioned as a catalyst for concept development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beeckman, I. (1939). Journal tenu par Isaac Beeckman de 1604 à 1634. The Hague: Martinius Nijhoff.
Bertoloni Meli D. (2006) Thinking with objects: The transformation of mechanics in the seventeenth century. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Blay M. (1993) Les raisons de l’infini: Du monde clos à l’univers mathématique. Gallimard, Paris
Blay, M. (1998). Reasoning with the infinite: From the closed world to the mathematical universe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (English translation of Blay 1993).
Brioist, J.-J., & Brioist, P. (2008). Harriot, lecteur d’Alvarus Thomas et de Tartaglia. In J. Biard & S. Rommevaux (Eds.), Mathématiques et théorie du mouvement (XIVe–XVIe siècles). Villeneuve d’Ascq: Septentrion.
Bruner J. S., Olver R. R., Greenfield P. M. (1967) Studies in cognitive growth: A collaboration at the center for cognitive studies. Wiley, New York
Büttner, J. (2009). Galileo’s challenges: The orgin and early conceptual development of Galileo’s theory of naturally accelerated motion on inclined planes. Ph.D. Thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Büttner, J., Damerow, P., & Renn, J. (2001). Traces of an invisible giant: Shared knowledge in Galileo’s unpublished treatises. In J. Montesinos & C. Solís (Eds.), Largo campo di filosofare: Eurosymposium Galileo 2001 (pp. 183–201). La Orotava: Fundación Canaria Orotava de Historia de la Ciencia.
Büttner, J., Damerow, P., Renn, J., & Schemmel, M. (2003). The challenging images of artillery: Practical knowledge at the root of the scientific revolution. In W. Lefèvre, J. Renn & U. Schoepflin (Eds.), The power of images in early modern science (pp. 3–27). Basel: Birkhäuser.
Clagett M. (1950) Richard Swineshead and late medieval physics. Osiris 9: 131–61
Clagett M. (1959) The science of mechanics in the middle ages. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
Clagett, M. (ed. and transl.). (1968). Nicole Oresme and the Medieval geometry of qualities and motions: A treatise on the uniformity and difformity of intensities known as ‘Tractatus de configurationibus qualitatum et motuum’. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.
Cohen I. B. (1956) Galileo’s rejection of the possibility of velocity changing uniformly with respect to distance. Isis 47: 231–235
Damerow, P. (1996). Abstraction and representation: Essays on the cultural evolution of thinking. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Damerow P., Freudenthal G., McLaughlin P., Renn J. (2004) Exploring the limits of preclassical mechanics. Springer, New York
Descartes, R. (1964–74). Euvres de Descartes. In C. Adam & P. Tannery (Eds.) Paris: Vrin.
Drake S. (1970) Uniform acceleration, space, and time (Galileo Gleanings XIX). The British Journal for the History of Science 5: 21–43
Drake S. (1973) Galileo’s discovery of the laws of free fall. Scientific American 228(5): 84–92
Duhem P. M. M. (1913) Études sur Leonardo da Vinci: Troisième série: Les précurseurs parisiens de Galilée. Paris: Hermann
Galileo G. (1968) Le opere di Galileo Galilei: Nuova ristampa della edizione nazionale, 20 vols. (Antonio Favaro, ed., 1890–1909). Barbèra, Florence
Galluzzi P. (1979) Momento: Studi galileiani. Ateneo e Bizzari, Rome
Heytesbury W. (1494) Tractatus Gulielmi Hentisberi de sensu composito et diuiso; Regule eiusdem cum sophismatibus .... Bonetus Locatellus, Venice
Huygens C. (1986) Christiaan Huygens’ ‘The pendulum clock, or, geometrical demonstrations concerning the motion of pendula as applied to clocks’. Iowa State University Press, Ames
Jullien V., Charrak A. (2002) Ce que dit Descartes touchant la chute des corps: de 1618 à 1646, étude d’un indicateur de la philosophie naturelle cartésienne. Septentrion, Villeneuve d’Ascq
Koyré, A. (1939). \’Etudes Galiléennes. Paris: Hermann (1939).
Koyré, A. (1978). Galileo studies. New Jersey: Humanities Press (1978) [English translation of Koyré (1978)].
Maier, A. (1952) An der Grenze von Scholastik und Naturwissenschaft: Die Struktur der materiellen Substanz, das Problem der Gravitation, die Mathematik der Formlatituden (2nd edn.). Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.
Maier, A. (1968). Zwei Grundprobleme der scholastischen Naturphilosophie: I. Das Problem der intensiven Grö ße, II. die Impetustheorie (3rd edn.). Rome: Edizioni di Storia e Letteratura.
Pierce, C. S. (1967). In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 3 and 4). Belknap Press: Cambridge.
Renn, J., Damerow, P., Rieger, S., & Giulini, D. (2001). Hunting the white elephant: When and how did Galileo discover the law of fall? In J. Renn (Ed.), Galileo in context (pp. 29–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rommevaux, S. (ed. and transl.). (2010). Thomas Bradwardine: ‘Traité des rapports entre les rapidités dans les mouvements’ suivi de Nicole Oresme: ‘Sur les rapports de rapports’. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
Schemmel M. (2006) The English Galileo: Thomas Harriot and the force of shared knowledge in early modern mechanics. Physics in Perspective 8: 360–380
Schemmel M. (2008) The English Galileo: Thomas Harriot’s work on motion as an example of preclassical mechanics. Springer, Dordrecht
Stjernfelt F. (2007) Diagrammatology. Springer, Dordrecht
Sylla E. D. (1973) Medieval Concepts of the latitude of forms: The Oxford calculators. Archives d’histoire doctrinale et Littéraire du moyen Âge 40: 223–283
Sylla, E. D. (1986). Galileo and the Oxford Calculatores: Analytical languages and the mean-speed theorem for accelerated motion. In: W. A. Wallace (Ed.), Reinterpreting Galileo (pp. 53–108). Washington: The Catholic University of America Press.
Valleriani M. (2010) Galileo engineer. Springer, Dordrecht
Wallace W. A. (1968) The enigma of Domingo de Soto: Uniformiter difformis and falling bodies in late medieval physics. Isis 59: 384–401
Weisheipl J. A. (1959) The place of John Dumbleton in the Merton School. Isis 50: 439–454
Wilson C. (1956) William Heytesbury: Medieval logic and the rise of mathematical physics. The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison
Zilsel E. (2000) The social origins of modern science. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schemmel, M. Medieval Representations of Change and Their Early Modern Application. Found Sci 19, 11–34 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-012-9312-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-012-9312-9