The purpose of this article is threefold. Firstly, it aims to present, in an educational and non-technical fashion, the main ideas at the basis of Aerts’ creation-discovery view and hidden measurement approach: a fundamental explanatory framework whose importance, in this author’s view, has been seriously underappreciated by the physics community, despite its success in clarifying many conceptual challenges of quantum physics. Secondly, it aims to introduce a new quantum machine—that we call the δ quantum machine—which is able to reproduce the transmission and reflection probabilities of a one-dimensional quantum scattering process by a Dirac delta-function potential. The machine is used not only to demonstrate the pertinence of the above mentioned explanatory framework, in the general description of physical systems, but also to illustrate (in the spirit of Aerts’ ∊-model) the origin of classical and quantum structures, by revealing the existence of processes which are neither classical nor quantum, but irreducibly intermediate. We do this by explicitly introducing what we call the k-model and by proving that its processes cannot be modelized by a classical or quantum scattering system. The third purpose of this work is to exploit the powerful metaphor provided by our quantum machine, to investigate the intimate relation between the concept of potentiality and the notion of non-spatiality, that we characterize in precise terms, introducing for this the new concept of process-actuality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Accardi L. (1982) On the statistical meaning of the complex numbers in quantum mechanics. Nuovo Cimento 34: 161
Aerts D. (1982) Description of many physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics 12: 1131–1170
Aerts D. (1984) The missing element of reality in the description of quantum mechanics of the EPR paradox situation. Helvetica physica Acta 57: 421–428
Aerts D. (1992a) A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematical Physics 27: 202–210
Aerts D. (1992b) The construction of reality and its influence on the understanding of quantum structures. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 31: 1815–1837
Aerts D. (1995) Quantum structures: An attempt to explain the origin of their appearance in nature. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 34: 1165
Aerts D. (1996a) Relativity theory: What is reality?. Foundations of Physics 26: 1627–1644
Aerts D. (1996b) Towards a framework for possible unification of quantum and relativity theories. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 35: 2399–2416
Aerts D. (1998) The entity and modern physics: The creation-discovery view of reality. In: Castellani E. (Ed.). Interpreting bodies: Classical and quantum objects in modern physics. Princeton Unversity Press, Princeton
Aerts D. (1999a) The stuff the world is made of: Physics and reality, p. 129. In: Aerts D., Broekaert J., Mathijs E. (eds) The white book of ‘Einstein meets magritte’. Kluwer, Dordrecht, p 274
Aerts D. (1999b) Quantum mechanics: Structures, axioms and paradoxes, p. 141. In: Aerts D., Broekaert J., Mathijs E. (eds) The indigo book of ‘Einstein meets magritte’. Kluwer, Dordrecht, p 239
Aerts D. (2000) The description of joint quantum entities and the formulation of a paradox. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 39: 485–496
Aerts D. (2009) Quantum particles as conceptual entities. A possible explanatory framework for quantum theory. Foundations of Science 14: 361–411
Aerts D. (2010) Interpreting quantum particles as conceptual entities. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 49: 2950–2970
Aerts, D., & Sozzo, S. (2011a). Contextual risk and its relevance in economics. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review. arXiv:1105.1812 [physics.soc-ph].
Aerts, D., & Sozzo, S. (2011b). A contextual risk model for the Ellsberg paradox. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review. arXiv:1105.1814v1 [physics.soc-ph].
Aerts D., Durt T. (1994) Quantum, classical and intermediate, an illustrative example. Foundations of Science 24: 1353
Aerts D. et al (1987) The origin of the non-classical character of the quantum probability model. In: Blanquiere A. (Ed.), Information, complexity, and control in quantum physics. Springer, New York
Aerts, D., et al. (1990). An attempt to imagine parts of the reality of the micro-world. In J. Mizerski (Ed.), Problems in quantum physics II; Gdansk ’89 (pp. 3–25). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.
Amrein W. O. (1981) Non-relativistic quantum dynamics. Riedel, Dordrecht
Birkhoff G., Von Neumann J. (1936) The logic of quantum mechanics. The Annals of Mathematics 37: 823
Born M. (1926) Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge. zeitschrift für physik 38: 803–827
Coecke B. (1998) A representation for compound quantum systems as individual entities: Hard acts of creation and hidden correlations. Foundations of Physics 28: 1109–1135
Emch G. G. (1984) Mathematical and conceptual foundations of twentieth century physics. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Feynman R. P. (1992) The character of physical law. Penguin Books, London
Foulis D., Randall C. (1972) Operational statistics I–Basic concepts. Journal of Mathematical Physics 11: 1667–1675
Gudder S. P. (1988) Quantum probability. Academic Press, Inc. Harcourt Brave Jovanovich, New York
Jauch J. M. (1968) Foundations of quantum mechanics. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass
Piron C. (1976) Foundations of quantum physics. W. A. Benjamin, Massachusetts
Piron C. (1978) La Description d’un Système Physique et le Présupposé de la Théorie Classique. Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie 3: 131–152
Piron, C. (1990). Mécanique quantique: Bases et applications. Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Pitovski I. (1989) Quantum probability—quantum logic. Springer, Berlin
Randall, C., & Foulis, D. (1983). A mathematical language for quantum physics, in Les Fondements de la Mecanique Quantique, ed. C. Gruber et al, A.V.C.P., case postale 101, 1015 Lausanne, Suisse.
Rauch H. (1988) Neutron interferometric tests of quantum mechanics. Helvetica Physica Acta 61: 589
Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2011a). From permanence to total availability: A quantum conceptual upgrade. Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-011-9233-z.
Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2011b). Time-delay of classical and quantum scattering processes: A conceptual overview and a general definition. Central European Journal of Physics. doi:10.2478/s11534-011-0105-5.
Sassoli de Bianchi, M. (2011c). Ephemeral properties and the illusion of microscopic particles. Foundations of Science, 16(4), 393–409. doi:10.1007/s10699-011-9227-x. An Italian translation of the article is also available: Proprietá effimere e l’illusione delle particelle microscopiche. AutoRicerca, Volume 2, pp. 39–76 (2011).
Segal I. E. (1947) Postulates for general quantum mechanics. Annals of Mathematics 48: 930–948
Smets S. (2005) The modes of physical properties in the logical foundations of physics Logic and Logical Philosophy 14:37–53
Vassell M. O., Lee J., Lockwood H. F. et al (1983) Multibarrier tunneling in Ga1-x Al x As/GaAs heterostructures. Journal of Applied Physics 54: 5206–5213
About this article
Cite this article
Sassoli de Bianchi, M. The δ-Quantum Machine, the k-Model, and the Non-ordinary Spatiality of Quantum Entities. Found Sci 18, 11–41 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9284-1
- Quantum structures
- Creation-discovery view
- Hidden measurement approach
- One-dimensional scattering
- Delta-function potential