The first two sections of this paper investigate what Newton could have meant in a now famous passage from “De Graviatione” (hereafter “DeGrav”) that “space is as it were an emanative effect of God.” First it offers a careful examination of the four key passages within DeGrav that bear on this. The paper shows that the internal logic of Newton’s argument permits several interpretations. In doing so, the paper calls attention to a Spinozistic strain in Newton’s thought. Second it sketches four interpretive options: (i) one approach is generic neo-Platonic; (ii) another approach is associated with the Cambridge Platonist, Henry More; a variant on this (ii*) emphasizes that Newton mixes Platonist and Epicurean themes; (iii) a necessitarian approach; (iv) an approach connected with Bacon’s efforts to reformulate a useful notion of form and laws of nature. Hitherto only the second and third options have received scholarly attention in scholarship on DeGrav. The paper offers new arguments to treat Newtonian emanation as a species of Baconian formal causation as articulated, especially, in the first few aphorisms of part two of Bacon’s New Organon. If we treat Newtonian emanation as a species of formal causation then the necessitarian reading can be combined with most of the Platonist elements that others have discerned in DeGrav, especially Newton’s commitment to doctrines of different degrees of reality as well as the manner in which the first existing being ‘transfers’ its qualities to space (as a kind of causa-sui). This can clarify the conceptual relationship between space and its formal cause in Newton as well as Newton’s commitment to the spatial extended-ness of all existing beings. While the first two sections of this paper engage with existing scholarly controversies, in the final section the paper argues that the recent focus on emanation has obscured the importance of Newton’s very interesting claims about existence and measurement in “DeGrav”. The paper argues that according to Newton God and other entities have the same kind of quantities of existence; Newton is concerned with how measurement clarifies the way of being of entities. Newton is not claiming that measurement reveals all aspects of an entity. But if we measure something then it exists as a magnitude in space and as a magnitude in time. This is why in DeGrav Newton’s conception of existence really helps to “lay truer foundations of the mechanical sciences.”
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Bacon, F. (1863). New Organon (J. Spedding, R. L. Ellis, & D. D. Heath, Trans.). In The works (Vol. VIII). Boston: Taggard and Thompson.
Burtt E. A. (1927) The metaphysical foundations of modern science. K. Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co, London
Cassirer E. (1951) The philosophy of the enlightenment (P. P. James & C. A. K. Fritz, Trans.). Princeton University Press, Princeton
Feingold M. (2001) Mathematicians and naturalists: Sir Isaac Newton and the royal society. In: Bernard Cohen I., Buchwald J. Z. (eds) Isaac Newton’s natural philosophy. MIT Press, Cambridge
Feingold M. (2004) The Newtonian moment: Isaac Newton and the making of modern culture. New York Public Library, New York
Goldish M. (1999) Newton’s Of the Church: Its contents and implications. In: Force J. E., Popkin R. (eds) Newton and religion: Context, nature, and influence. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Gorham G. (2011) Newton on God’s relation to space and time: The cartesian framework. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93(3): 281–320
Grene, M. (1999 ). Descartes. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Press.
Harrison P. (2004) Was Newton a voluntarist?. In: Force J. E., Hutton S. (eds) Newton and Newtonianism. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Henry, J. (2004). Metaphysics and the origins of modern science: Descartes and the importance of laws of nature. Early Science and Medicine, 73–114.
Henry J. (2009) Voluntarist theology at the origins of modern science: A response to Peter Harrison. History of Science 47: 79–113
Henry J. (2011) Gravity and De gravitatione: The development of Newton’s ideas on action at a distance. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 42(1): 11–27
Hooker, R. (1888). The works of that learned and judicious divine Mr. Richard Hooker with an account of his life and Death by Isaac Walton. (Arranged by the Rev. John Keble MA. 7th edition revised by the Very Rev. R.W. Church and the Rev. F. Paget). Oxford: Clarendon Press. 3 vols. Vol. 1. Chapter: The first book. concerning laws and their several kinds in general. http://oll.libertyfund.org/title/921/85481. Accessed December 16, 2011.
Hume, D. (1739). A treatise concerning human understanding. http://www.davidhume.org/texts/?text=thn1#126.96.36.199. Accessed September 26, 2010.
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy; http://www.iep.utm.edu/e/emanatio.htm. Accessed on October 24, 2008.
Jalobeanu D. (2007) Space, bodies and geometry: Some sources of Newton’s metaphysics. Zeitsprünge, Forschungen zur Frühen Neuzeit 11: 81–113
Janiak, A. (ms). Newton’s concept of space and the history of philosophy.
Kuhn T. (1977) The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Lange M. (2009) Laws and lawmakers. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lee R. A. Jr. (2006) The cartesian resources for Descartes’ concept of Causa Sui. In: Garber D., Nadler S. M. (eds) Oxford studies in early modern philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 91–118
Leibniz, G. W., & Clarke, S. (2000). In R. Ariew (Ed.), Correspondence. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
MacLaurin, C. (1748). Account of Sir Isaac Newton’s philosophy, London.
Mancosu P. (1999) Philosophy of mathematics and mathematical practice in the seventeenth century. Oxford University Press, Oxford
McGuire J. E. (1978) Existence, actuality and necessity: Newton on space and time. Annals of Science 35: 463–508
McGuire J. E. (2007) A dialogue with Descartes: Newton’s ontology of true and immutable natures. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45(1): 103–125
McGuire, J. E. (2011). Ideas and texts. Newton and the intellectual history of science. Sartoniana, 24, 37–48. http://www.sartonchair.ugent.be/en/journal/archive.
Mercer C. (2001) Leibniz’s metaphysics: Its origins and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Newton, I. (1978). In A. R. Hall & M. B. Hall (Eds.), Unpublished scientific papers of Isaac Newton: A selection from the Portsmouth Collection in the University Library. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Newton I. (2004) Philosophical writings edited by Andrew Janiak. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Oackley F. (1961) Christian theology and the Newtonian science: The rise of the concept of the laws of nature. Church History 30: 433–457
Schliesser, E. (2008). Hume’s Newtonianism and anti-Newtonianism. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter Edition), Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), forthcoming URL http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2008/entries/hume-newton/.
Schliesser E. (2010a) Without God: gravity as a relational quality in Newton’s treatise. In: Jalobeanu D., Anstey P. (eds) Vanishing body and the laws of motion: Descartes and beyond. Routledge, London
Schliesser E. (2010b) Book review of Epicureanism at the origins of modernity, by Catherine Wilson. Mind 119(474): 535–539
Schliesser E. (2011) Newton’s substance monism, distant action, and the nature of Newton’s empiricism: Discussion of H. Kochiras. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 42(1): 160–166
Schliesser, E. (Forthcoming, a). Spinoza and the philosophy of science: Mathematics, motion, and being. In M. D. Rocca (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Spinoza. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schliesser, E. (Forthcoming, b). On reading Newton as an Epicurean: Kant, Spinozism and the changes to the Principia. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science.
Slowik, E. (2008). Newton’s metaphysics of space: A “Tertium Quid” betwixt substantivalism and relationalism, or “Merely a God of the (Relational Mechanical) Gaps?” http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00004185/.
Slowik E. (2009) Newton’s metaphysics of space: A “Tertium Quid” betwixt substantivalism and relationalism, or “Merely a God of the (Relational Mechanical) Gaps?. ” Perspectives on Science, 17(4,): 429–456
Slowik, E. (2012). Newton’s neo-platonic ontology of space. Foundations of Science. doi:10.1007/s10699-011-9278-z.
Steenbergen, G. (ms). The role of measurement in Newton’s De Gravitatione.
Stein H. (1967) Newtonian spacetime. Texas Quarterly 10: 174–200
Stein H. (2002) Newton’s metaphysics. In: Cohen I. B., Smith G. E. (eds) Cambridge companion to Isaac Newton. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Whitehead A. N. (1933) Adventures of ideas. Simon & Schuster, New York
About this article
Cite this article
Schliesser, E. Newtonian Emanation, Spinozism, Measurement and the Baconian Origins of the Laws of Nature. Found Sci 18, 449–466 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-011-9279-y