Performing Phenomenology: Negotiating Presence in Intermedial Theatre

Abstract

This paper analyzes from a pragmatic postphenomenological point of view the performative practice of CREW, a multi-disciplinary team of artists and researchers. It is our argument that this company, in its use of new immersive technologies in the context of a live stage, gives rise to a dialectics between an embodied and a disembodied perspective towards the perceived world. We will focus on W (Double U), a collaborative interactive performance, where immersive technology is used for live exchange of vision. By means of a head mounted omni-directional camera and display the fields of vision of two participants are swapped, which enables the participants to perceive the world through another person’s point of view. This intermedial experience brings a classic dichotomic perception of space to falter: material reality as a ‘live’ condition can no longer be opposed to a virtual mediated reality. In the shifting moment between the embodied and the perceived world, on the fracture between what one sees and what one feels, the distinction between live and mediated is blurred, moreover, can no longer be made. The perception of the body is pushed to the extreme, causing a most confusing corporal awareness, a condition that intensifies the experience and causes an altered sense of presence. In a dynamic cognitive negotiation, one tends, however, to unify the divergent ontologies of the ‘real’ and the ‘virtual’ to a meaningful experience. In this respect, we refer to recent neurological experiments such as the ‘rubber hand illusion’ in order to clarify the spectator’s tendency to fuse both ontologies and to embody a coherent image-world.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Auslander P. (1999) Liveness: Performance in a mediatized culture. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baker S., Nayar S. (1999) A theory of single-viewpoint catadioptric image formation. International Journal of Computer Vision 35: 175–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Botvinick M., Cohen J. (1998) Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature 391: 756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapple F., Kattenbelt C. (2006) Intermediality in theatre and performance. Rodopi, Amsterdam and New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dixon S. (2007) Digital performance. A history of new media in theater, dance, performance art, and installation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garner S. (1994) Bodied spaces. Cornell UP, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giannachi G. (2004) Virtual theatres: An introduction. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grau O. (2003) Virtual art: From illusion to immersion. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ihde D. (2002) Bodies in technology. Electronic mediations, Vol. 5. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ihde, D. (2003). Postphenomenology—Again? Aarhus: The centre for STS studies.

  11. Jones C. A. (2007) Sensorium. Embodied experience, technology, and contemporary art. MIT press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Merleau-Ponty M. (2002) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Moreno, E., MacIntyre, & B., Bolter, J. D. (2001). Alice’s adventures in new media: An exploration of interactive narratives in augmented reality. (Paper presented at CAST ‘01, Bonn, Germany. 2001.) http://www.netzspannung.org/journal/special/

  14. Rees, D. W. (1970). Panoramic television viewing system, United States Patent No. 3, 505, 465.

  15. Schubert T., Friedmann F., Regenbrecht H. (1999) Embodied presence in virtual environments. In: Paton R., Neilson I. (eds) Visual representations and interpretations. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 268–278

    Google Scholar 

  16. Slater M., Steed A. (2000) A virtual presence counter. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9: 413–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. States B. (1987) Great reckonings in little rooms. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vanhoutte K. (2003) The virtual body of philoctetes: Integrating performance art and technology. In: Ascott R. (Ed.) Proceedings CDRom consciousness reframed. Curtin University of Technology, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  19. Verschaffel B. (1995) Over theatraliteit Figuren. Van Halewyck, Leuven

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nele Wynants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vanhoutte, K., Wynants, N. Performing Phenomenology: Negotiating Presence in Intermedial Theatre. Found Sci 16, 275–284 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9193-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Immersive technology
  • Performance
  • Virtual environment
  • Sensorial deprivation
  • Embodiment
  • Transitional space
  • (Post-)phenomenology
  • (Tele-) presence