Foundations of Science

, Volume 16, Issue 2–3, pp 275–284 | Cite as

Performing Phenomenology: Negotiating Presence in Intermedial Theatre

  • Kurt Vanhoutte
  • Nele WynantsEmail author


This paper analyzes from a pragmatic postphenomenological point of view the performative practice of CREW, a multi-disciplinary team of artists and researchers. It is our argument that this company, in its use of new immersive technologies in the context of a live stage, gives rise to a dialectics between an embodied and a disembodied perspective towards the perceived world. We will focus on W (Double U), a collaborative interactive performance, where immersive technology is used for live exchange of vision. By means of a head mounted omni-directional camera and display the fields of vision of two participants are swapped, which enables the participants to perceive the world through another person’s point of view. This intermedial experience brings a classic dichotomic perception of space to falter: material reality as a ‘live’ condition can no longer be opposed to a virtual mediated reality. In the shifting moment between the embodied and the perceived world, on the fracture between what one sees and what one feels, the distinction between live and mediated is blurred, moreover, can no longer be made. The perception of the body is pushed to the extreme, causing a most confusing corporal awareness, a condition that intensifies the experience and causes an altered sense of presence. In a dynamic cognitive negotiation, one tends, however, to unify the divergent ontologies of the ‘real’ and the ‘virtual’ to a meaningful experience. In this respect, we refer to recent neurological experiments such as the ‘rubber hand illusion’ in order to clarify the spectator’s tendency to fuse both ontologies and to embody a coherent image-world.


Immersive technology Performance Virtual environment Sensorial deprivation Embodiment Transitional space (Post-)phenomenology (Tele-) presence 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Auslander P. (1999) Liveness: Performance in a mediatized culture. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker S., Nayar S. (1999) A theory of single-viewpoint catadioptric image formation. International Journal of Computer Vision 35: 175–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Botvinick M., Cohen J. (1998) Rubber hands “feel” touch that eyes see. Nature 391: 756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapple F., Kattenbelt C. (2006) Intermediality in theatre and performance. Rodopi, Amsterdam and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Dixon S. (2007) Digital performance. A history of new media in theater, dance, performance art, and installation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Garner S. (1994) Bodied spaces. Cornell UP, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  7. Giannachi G. (2004) Virtual theatres: An introduction. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Grau O. (2003) Virtual art: From illusion to immersion. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  9. Ihde D. (2002) Bodies in technology. Electronic mediations, Vol. 5. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  10. Ihde, D. (2003). Postphenomenology—Again? Aarhus: The centre for STS studies.Google Scholar
  11. Jones C. A. (2007) Sensorium. Embodied experience, technology, and contemporary art. MIT press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  12. Merleau-Ponty M. (2002) Phenomenology of perception. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Moreno, E., MacIntyre, & B., Bolter, J. D. (2001). Alice’s adventures in new media: An exploration of interactive narratives in augmented reality. (Paper presented at CAST ‘01, Bonn, Germany. 2001.)
  14. Rees, D. W. (1970). Panoramic television viewing system, United States Patent No. 3, 505, 465.Google Scholar
  15. Schubert T., Friedmann F., Regenbrecht H. (1999) Embodied presence in virtual environments. In: Paton R., Neilson I. (eds) Visual representations and interpretations. Springer-Verlag, London, pp 268–278Google Scholar
  16. Slater M., Steed A. (2000) A virtual presence counter. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 9: 413–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. States B. (1987) Great reckonings in little rooms. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  18. Vanhoutte K. (2003) The virtual body of philoctetes: Integrating performance art and technology. In: Ascott R. (Ed.) Proceedings CDRom consciousness reframed. Curtin University of Technology, PerthGoogle Scholar
  19. Verschaffel B. (1995) Over theatraliteit Figuren. Van Halewyck, LeuvenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Theatre, Film & Literature StudiesUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations