Abstract
According to Zurek, the emergence of a classical world from a quantum substrate could result from a long selection process that privileges the classical bases according to a principle of optimal information. We investigate the consequences of this principle in a simple case, when the system and the environment are two interacting scalar particles supposedly in a pure state. We show that then the classical regime corresponds to a situation for which the entanglement between the particles (the system and the environment) disappears. We describe in which circumstances this factorisability condition is fulfilled, in the case that the particles interact via position-dependent potentials, and also describe in appendix the tools necessary for understanding our results (entanglement, Bell inequalities and so on).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bell J. S. (1965) On the EPR paradox. Physics 1: 195–200
Bell J. S. (1987) Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics. University Press, Cambridge
Braun, D. (2005). Entanglement from thermal black body radiation (pp. 1–10), quant-ph/0505082.
Braunstein S. L., Mann A., Revzen M. (1992) Maximal violation of Bell inequalities for mixed states. Physics Review Letters 68: 3259–3261
Broadbent, A., & Methot, A. A. (2005). Entanglement swapping, light cones and elements of reality (pp. 1–9), quant-ph/0511047.
Bruss D. (2002) Characterizing entanglement. Journal of Mathematics and Physics 43(9): 4237–4251
Ciron M. A., Dahl J. P., Fedorov M., Greenberger D., Schleich W. P. (2002) Huygen’s principle, the free Schrödinger particle and the quantum anti-centrifugal force. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 35: 191–203
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., & Zanghi, N. (2005). To appear in the encyclopedia of philosophy, 2nd edn [edited by D. M. Borchert (Macmillan Reference, (www.math.rutgers.edu/~oldstein/papers/bbt.pdf))].
Durt, T. (2000). Localization of quantum systems and special relativity. In Proceedings of the conference, physical interpretations of relativity theory (p. 89). London, September 2000.
Durt, T. (2001). Characterization of an entanglement-free evolution (PP. 1–21). quant-ph/0109112.
Durt, T. (2004a). Quoted in the New Scientist, March 2004, in the paper “Quantum Entanglement, How the Future can influence the past”, by Michael Brooks, about entanglement and interaction in Quantum Mechanics.
Durt T. (2004) Quantum entanglement, interaction, and the classical limit. Zeit fur Naturf 59A: 425–436
Durt, T. (2006). Quantum information, entanglement and relationships. Cosmos, 2(1), 21–48 (World Scientific Singapore).
Durt T. (2007) Quantum information, a survey. Physicalia Magazine 29(4): 145–160
Ehrenfest, P. (1917). In what way does it become manifest in the fundamental laws of physics that space has three dimensions. In Proceedings of Amsterdam academy, Vol. 20, (p. 200–209).
Ehrenfest P. (1920) Welche Rolle spielt die Dreidimensionalitat des Raumes in den Grundgesetzen der Physik?. Annual Physics New York 61: 440–449
Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N. (1935) Can quantum mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Physics Review 47: 777–780
Engel G. S., Calhoun Tessa R., Read E. L., Ahn T.-K., Manal T., Cheng Y.-C., Blankenship R. E., Fleming Graham R. (2007) Evidence for wavelike energy transfer through quantum coherence in photosynthetic systems. Nature 446: 782–786
Faris, W. (1996). Notices of the AMs, November , 1339 (http://www.ams.org/notices/199611/faris.pdf).
Gemmer J., Mahler G. (2001) Entanglement and the factorization approximation. European Physics Journal D 17: 385–393
Gisin N. (1991) Bell’s inequality holds for all non-product states. Physics Letter A 154(5,6): 201
Home D., Selleri F. (1991) Bell’s theorem and the EPR paradox. La Rivista del Nuovo Cimento della Societa Italiana di fisica 14(9): 1–95
Jaeger G., Shimony A., Vaidman L. (1995) Two interferometric complementarities. Physics Review A 51: 54–67
Janssen, H. (2008). Reconstructing Reality Environment-induced decoherence, the measurement problem, and the emergence of definiteness in quantum mechanics. Master Thesis, Univ. Nijmegen, http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/archive/00004224/01/scriptie.pdf. A critical assessment
Kaslikowski D., Kwek L. C., Englert B.-G., Zukowski M. (2003) Information theoretic approach to single-particle and two-particle interference in multi-path interferometers. Physics Review Letters 91: 037901 (4 pages)
Masanes, L., Acin, A., & Gisin, N. (2005). General properties of nonsignaling theories (pp. 1–10), quant-ph/0508016.
Masanes, L., Acin, A., & Gisin, N. (2010). From Bell’s theorem to secure quantum key distribution (pp. 1–5), quant-ph/0510094.
Nielsen M. A., Chuang I. L. (2000) Quantum computing and quantum information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Omnès R. (1994) The interpretation of quantum mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Osterloh A., Amico L., Falci G., Fazio R. (2001) Scaling of the entanglement close to quantum phase transitions. Letters to Nature 416: 608–610
Paz J. P., Zurek W. H. (1999) Quantum limit of decoherence: Environment induced superselection of energy eigenstates. Physics Review Letters 82: 5181–5185
Peres A. (2004) What is actually teleported?. IBM Journal of Research and Development 48(1): 63–68
Quack M. (2002) How important is parity violation for molecular and biomolecular chirality?. Angewandte Chemie 41(24): 4618–4630
Schrödinger, E. (1935). Discussion of probability relations between separated systems. In Proceedings of Cambridge Philosophy Society, Vol. 31 (p. 555–563). The english translation can also be found in Wheeler and Zurek (1983).
Scully M., Englert B.-G., Walther H. (1991) Quantum optical tests of complementarity. Nature 351: 111–116
Seevinck M. (2004) Holism, physical theories and quantum mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35B: 693–712
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423 (623–656), http://plan9.belllabs.com/cm/ms/what/shannonday/shannon1948.pdf.
Squires E. (1994) The mystery of the quantum world (2nd ed.). Taylor and Francis, New York
Tittel W., Brendel J., Zbinden H., Gisin N. (1998) Quantum cryptography using entangled photons in energy-time bell states. Physics Review Letters 81: 3563–3566
Tittel, W., Brendel, J., Zbinden, H., & Gisin, N. (2000). Experimental test of relativistic quantum state collapse with moving reference frames (pp. 1–4), quant-ph/0002031.
Wheeler, J.A., Zurek, W.H. (eds) (1983) Quantum theory and measurement. Princeton, NJ
Wiseman H.M., Eisert J. (2007) Nontrivial quantum effects in biology: A skeptical point of view. In: Abbott D. (eds) Invited contribution to Quantum aspects of life. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 381–402
Zurek, W. H. (1981). Pointer basis of quantum apparatus: Into what mixture does the wave packet collapse Physics Review D, 24, 1516–1525
Zurek W.H. (1982) Environment-induced superselection rules. Physics Review D 26: 1862–1880
Zurek W.H. (1991) Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical. Physics Today 44(10): 36–44
Zurek W.H. (1993) Preferred states, predictability, classicality, and the environment-induced decoherence. Progress Theory Physics 89(2): 281–312
Zurek, W. H. (2003). Decoherence and the transition from quantum to classical revisited, http://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0306072.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
It is even an open question to know whether the non-classical aspects of quantum mechanics play a fundamental role in biological processes at all. It is for instance an open question to know whether or not quantum coherence must be invoked in order to explain intra-cellular processes. Nothing illustrates better the present situation than this quote of Wiseman and Eisert (2007): “When you have excluded the trivial, whatever remains, however, improbable, must be a good topic for a debate”. . ..
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Durt, T. Anthropomorphic Quantum Darwinism as an Explanation for Classicality. Found Sci 15, 177–197 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9173-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9173-z