Abstract
In recent years there have been an increasing number of contributions to economic methodology that develop or seek to reveal ontological positions. Despite this there is no agreement about either what ontology is or how it can contribute to economics. For some ontological theorising reveals the presuppositions of economists and its role is largely descriptive. Others see ontology as primarily engaged in setting out and defending a general account of some domain of reality and suggest that such a conception can help us evaluate the appropriateness of the methods economists deploy. In this paper I clarify the scope and role of such theorising in economics by considering two projects with ontological orientations, namely critical realism in economics as developed by Tony Lawson and Nancy Cartwright’s work on the nature of economic theory. I argue that there are similarities between these two projects but also differences and show that these can be better understood once we recognise that each draws on a distinct conception of the legitimate scope of ontological theorising. I use Peirce’s writings on the nature of sustainable metaphysical analysis to clarify certain aspects of the approach to ontological theorising that Lawson favours.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexandrova A. (2006). Connecting economic models to the real world: Game theory and the FCC Spectrum Auctions. Philosophy of the Social Science 36(2): 173–192
Bhaskar R. (1978). A realist theory of science. London, Harvester Wheatsheaf
Bhaskar R. (1986). Scientific realism and human emancipation. London, Verso
Cartwright N. (1989a). Nature’s capacities and their measurement. Oxford, Clarendon Press
Cartwright N. (1989b). A case study in realism: Why econometrics is committed to capacities. PSA, pp. 190–197
Cartwright, N. (1992). Aristotelian natures and the modern experimental method. In J. Earman, (Ed.), Inference, explanation and other frustrations: Essays in the philosophy of science. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Cartwright, N. (1995a). Ceteris Paribus laws and socio-economic machines. The Monist 78(3). Reprinted In U. Mäki, (Ed.) The economic world view: Studies in the ontology of economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cartwright N. (1995b). False idealisation: A philosophical threat to scientific method. Philosophical Studies 77(2–3): 339–352
Cartwright N. (1995c). An interview with Nancy Cartwright. Cogito 9(3): 203–215
Cartwright, N. (1995d). Causal structures in econometrics. In D. Little (Ed.), On the reliability of economic models. Boston: Kluwer.
Cartwright N. (1999a). The dappled world: A Study of the boundaries of science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Cartwright, N. (1999b). The vanity of rigour in economics: Theoretical models and Galilean experiments, LSE Centre for Philosophy of Natural and Social Sciences, Discussion Paper 43.
Cartwright, N. (2002). The dappled world: A study of the boundaries of science. Book symposium, summary. Philosophical Books, pp. 241–243.
Cartwright N. (2003). Against the system. LSE, Mimeograph
Chalmers A. (1987). Bhaskar, Cartwright and realism in physics. Methodology and Science 20: 77–96
Colapietro V. (2002). The seduction of linguistics and other signs of eros. Semiotica 142(1): 225–290
Colapietro V. (2004). Striving to speak in a human voice: A Peircean contribution to metaphysical discourse. The Review of Metaphysics 58: 367–398
Fleetwood S. (ed)(1999). Critical realism in economics: Development and debate. London, Routledge
Guala F. (2005). An ontology of economics?. Mimeograph, University of Exeter
Haack S. (1998). Manifesto of a passionate moderate: Unfashionable essays. Chicago, University of Chicago Press
Haack, S. (forthcoming). The Legitimacy of metaphysics: Kant’s legacy to Peirce, and Peirce’s to philosophy today. to appear in H. Lenk, (Ed.) Kant today. Munster: LIT Verlag.
Hands W. (2001). Reflection without rules: Economic methodology and contemporary science theory. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
Hookway C. (2000). Truth, rationality and pragmatism: Themes from Peirce. Oxford, Oxford University Press
Hoover, K. (2002). Econometrics and reality. In U. Mäki (ed.). Fact and fiction in economics: models, realism and social construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lawson, T. (1989). Abstraction, tendencies and stylised facts: a realist approach to economic analysis’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol 13, pp 59–78.
Lawson T. (1997). Economics and reality. London, Routledge
Lawson T. (2001). Two responses to the failings of modern economics. Review of Population and Social Policy 10: 155–181
Lawson T. (2003a). Reorienting economics. London, Routledge
Lawson T. (2003b). Ontology and feminist theorizing. Feminist Economics 9(1):119–150
Lawson T. (2004). A conception of ontology. Mimeograph, University of Cambridge
Lawson, T. (2005). Modern economics: The problem and a solution. In E. Fullbrook (Ed.) A guide to what’s wrong with economics, London: Anthem press.
Lewis P. (2004). Transforming economics: Perspectives on the critical realist project. London, Routledge
Lipton P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation(2nd ed.). London, Routledge
Mäki, U. (2002). The dismal queen of the social sciences. In Fact and fiction: Models, realism and social construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–58). Collected papers of Charles S. Peirce. In C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, and A. Burks (Eds.) (8 vols), Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press. Referred to in text as CP; references in text are to volume and paragraph number.
Psillos S. (2002). Cartwright’s realist toil: From entities to capacities. Mimeograph, University of Athens
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pratten, S. The scope of ontological theorising. Found Sci 12, 235–256 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-007-9106-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-007-9106-7