Foundations of Chemistry

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 61–75 | Cite as

Electronegativity and its multiple faces: persistence and measurement

  • Klaus Ruthenberg
  • Juan Camilo Martínez González
Article

Abstract

Electronegativity is a quantified, typical chemical concept, which correlates the ability of chemical species (atoms, molecules, ions, radicals, elements) to attract electrons during their contact with other species with measurable quantities such as dissociation energies, dipole moments, ionic radii, ionization potentials, electron affinities and spectroscopic data. It is applied to the description and explanation of chemical polarity, reaction mechanisms, other concepts such as acidity and oxidation, the estimation of types of chemical compounds and periodicity. Although this concept is very successful and widely used, and in spite of the fact that it is still subject to scientific investigations, neither a more than intuitive definition nor a generally accepted, logically clear and standardized quantification model has been developed. In the present work, electronegativity is presented and discussed with respect to its main conceptual and operational continuities and discontinuities. We try to analyze the epistemological status of electronegativity, conceived as a typical notion of chemical sciences. Under ‘epistemological status’ we subsume the issues of its reference, its historical persistence, and the relationship between its measurement and quantification.

Keywords

Electronegativity Chemical properties Measurement scales Reactivity Property quantification, reference 

References

  1. Allen, L.C.: Electronegativity is the average one-electron energy of the valence-shell electrons in ground-state free atoms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 9003–9014 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allred, A.L., Rochow, E.G.: A scale of electronegativity based on electrostatic force. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 5, 264–268 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allred, A.L.: Electronegativity values from thermochemical data. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 17, 215–221 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkins, P., de Paula, J.: Elements of Physical Chemistry, 6th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)Google Scholar
  5. Batsanov, S.S.: The concept of electronegativity. Conclusions and Prospects. Russ. Chem. Rev. 37, 332–351 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boeyens, J.C.: The Theories of Chemistry. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
  7. Boeyens, J.C., du Toit, J.: The theoretical basis of electronegativity. Electron. J. Theor. Chem. 2, 296–301 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang, H.: Inventing Temperature—Measurement and Scientific Progress. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang, H.: A case for old-fashioned observability, and a reconstructed constructive empiricism. Philos. Sci. 72, 876–887 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang, H.: Acidity: the persistence of the everyday in the scientific. Philos. Sci. 79, 690–700 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ferreira, R.: Electronegativity and chemical bonding. Adv. Chem. Phys. 13, 55–84 (1967)Google Scholar
  12. Gordy, W.: A new method of determining electronegativity from other atomic properties. Phys. Rev. 69, 604–607 (1946)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heidelberger, M.: Alternative Interpretationen der Repräsentationstheorie der Messung. In: Meggle, G., Wessels, U. (Eds.) Analyomen: Proceedings of the 1st Conference Perspectives in Analytical Philosophy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 310–323 (1994)Google Scholar
  14. Hinze, J., Jaffe, H.: Electronegativity. I. Orbital electronegativity of neutral atoms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 84, 540–546 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jensen, W.B.: Electronegativity from Avogadro to Pauling. Part I: Origins of the electronegativity concept. J. Chem. Educ. 73, 11–20 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jensen, W.B.: Electronegativity from Avogadro to Pauling: II. Late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century developments. J. Chem. Educ. 80, 279–287 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jensen, W.B.: When was electronegativity first quantified? Part I. J. Chem. Educ. 89, 94–96 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leach, M.R.: Concerning electronegativity as a basic elemental property and why the periodic table is usually represented in its medium form. Found. Chem. 15, 13–29 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mach, E.: Die Principien der Wärmelehre. Verlag von Johann Ambrosius Barth, Leipzig (1900)Google Scholar
  20. Malone, G.: The electric moment as a measure of the ionic nature of covalent bonds. J. Chem. Phys. 1, 197–199 (1933)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mullay, J.: Estimation of atomic and group electronegativities. Struct. Bond. 66, 1–25 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mulliken, R.: A new electronaffinity scale; together with data on valence states and on valence ionization potentials and electron affinities. J. Chem. Phys. 2, 782–793 (1934)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pauling, L.: The nature of the chemical bond. IV. The energy of single bonds and the relative electronegativity of atoms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 54, 3570–3582 (1932)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pauling, L.: College chemistry: an introductory textbook of general chemistry, 2nd edn. W. H. Freeman & Company, San Francisco (1950)Google Scholar
  25. Pritchard, H.O., Skinner, H.A.: The concept of electronegativity. Chem. Rev. 55, 745–786 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ruthenberg, K., van Brakel, J.: Stuff—The Nature of Chemical Substances. Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg (2008)Google Scholar
  27. Sanderson, R.: An interpretation of bond lengths and a classification of bonds. Science 114, 670–672 (1951)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scerri, E.: Configurational energy and bond polarity. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 5786 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tal, E.: Old and new problems in philosophy of measurement. Philos. Compass 8(12), 1159–1173 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van Fraassen, B.: Scientific representation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Klaus Ruthenberg
    • 1
  • Juan Camilo Martínez González
    • 2
  1. 1.Coburg University of Applied Sciences and ArtsCoburgGermany
  2. 2.Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas – CONICETBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations