Skip to main content
Log in

The positions of lanthanum (actinium) and lutetium (lawrencium) in the periodic table: an update

  • Published:
Foundations of Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article updates the author’s 1982 argument that lutetium and lawrencium, rather than lanthanum and actinium, should be assigned to the d-block as the heavier analogs of scandium and yttrium, whereas lanthanum and actinium should be considered as the first members of the f-block with irregular configurations. This update is embedded within a detailed analysis of Lavelle’s abortive 2008 attempt to discredit this suggestion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brewer, L.: Energies of the electron configurations of the lanthanides and actinides. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 61, 1101–1111 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronyn, M.W.: The proper place of hydrogen in the periodic table. J. Chem. Educ. 80, 947–951 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, L., Chen, C., Lombard, J.R.: Raman and absorption spectrum of mass-selected lutetium dimers in argon matrices. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 10202–10206 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritzsche, S., Dong, C.Z., Koike, F., Uvarov, A.: The low-lying level structure of atomic lawrencium (Z = 103): energies and absorption rates. Eur. Phys. J. D 45, 107–113 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haire, R.G.: Insights into the bonding and electronic nature of heavy element materials. J. Alloy Compds. 444–445, 63–71 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, W.B.: The positions of lanthanum (actinium) and lutetium (lawrencium) in the periodic table. J. Chem. Educ. 59, 634–636 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, W.B.: The periodic table: facts or committees? J. Chem. Educ. 85, 1491–1493 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, W.B.: Misapplying the periodic table. J. Chem. Educ. 86, 1186 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen, C.K.: The loose connection between electron configuration and the chemical behavior of the heavy elements (transuranics). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 12, 12–19 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle, L.: Lanthanum (La) and actinium (Ac) should remain in the d-block. J. Chem. Educ. 85, 1482–1483 (2008a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle, L.: Response to the flyleaf periodic table. J. Chem. Educ. 85, 1491 (2008b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lavelle, L.: Response to misapplying the periodic law. J. Chem. Educ. 86, 1187 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, Y., Wang, J., Hou, Y., Zhong, X., Du, Y., Feng, Y.: First principle study of AlX (X = 3d, 4d, 5d elements and Lu) dimers. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 074305-1–074305-6 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva, R.J.: Fermium, mendelevium, nobelium, and lawrencium. In: Morss, L.R., Edelstein, N.M., Fuger, J. (eds.) The Chemistry of the Actinides and Transactinide Elements, Chapt 13, vol. 3, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William B. Jensen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jensen, W.B. The positions of lanthanum (actinium) and lutetium (lawrencium) in the periodic table: an update. Found Chem 17, 23–31 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-015-9216-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-015-9216-1

Keywords

Navigation