Skip to main content
Log in

Pure possibilities and some striking scientific discoveries

  • Published:
Foundations of Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regardless or independent of any actuality or actualization and exempt from spatiotemporal and causal conditions, each individual possibility is pure. Actualism excludes the existence of individual pure possibilities, altogether or at least as existing independently of actual reality. In this paper, I demonstrate, on the grounds of my possibilist metaphysics—panenmentalism—how some of the most fascinating scientific discoveries in chemistry could not have been accomplished without relying on pure possibilities and the ways in which they relate to each other (for instance, in theoretical models). The discoveries are the following: Dan Shechtman’s discovery of quasicrystals; Linus Pauling’s alpha helix; the discovery of F. Sherwood Rowland and Mario J. Molina concerning the destruction of the atmospheric ozone layer; and Neil Bartlett’s noble gas compounds. On the grounds of the analysis of these cases, actualism must fail, whereas panenmentalism gains support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, D.M.: Sketch for a Systematic Metaphysics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah, M.: Address of the president. Not. Rec. R. Soc. Lond. 49(1), 141–151 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, K.: Two axes of actualism. Philos. Rev. 114, 297–326 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, K.: Proxy “Actualism”. Philos. Stud. 129, 263–294 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocchiarella, N.B.: Formal Ontology and Conceptual Realism. Springer, Dordrecht (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Contessa, G.: Modal truthmakers and two varieties of actualism. Synthese 174, 341–353 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freund, M.A., Cocchiarella, N.B.: Modal Logic: An Introduction to Its Syntax and Semantics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilead, A.: Saving Possibilities: An Essay in Philosophical Psychology, vol. 80. Rodopi—Value Inquiry Book Series, Amsterdam & Atlanta (1999)

  • Gilead, A.: Singularity and Other Possibilities: Panenmentalist Novelties, vol. 139. Rodopi—Value Inquiry Book Series, Amsterdam & New York (2003)

  • Gilead, A.: Necessity and Truthful Fictions: Panenmentalist Observations, vol. 202. Rodopi—Value Inquiry Book Series, Amsterdam & New York (2009)

  • Gilead, A.: Actualist fallacies, from fax technology to lunar journeys. Philos. Lit. 34(1), 173–187 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilead, A.: The Privacy of the Psychical, vol. 233. Rodopi—Value Inquiry Book Series, Amsterdam & New York (2011)

  • Gilead, A.: Shechtman’s three question marks: Impossibility, possibility, and quasicrystals. Found. Chem. (2012) doi:10.1007/s10698-012-9156-y

  • Gillespie, R.J., Hargittai, I.: The VSEPR Model of Molecular Geometry. Allyn & Bacon, Boston (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, I.: Candid Science III: More Conversations with Famous Chemists, Hargittai, M. (ed). Imperial College Press, London (2003)

  • Hargittai, I.: Structures beyond crystals. J. Mol. Str. 976, 81–86 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, I.: Drive and Curiosity: What Fuels the Passions for Science. Prometheus Books, Amherst (2011a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, I.: Geometry and models in chemistry. Str. Chem. 22(3), 3–10 (2011b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, I.: Dan Shechtman’s quasicrystal discovery in perspective. Israel J. Chem. 51, 1–9 (2011c). doi:10.1002/ijch.201100137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellman, G.: Mathematics Without Numbers: Towards a Modal-Structural Interpretation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, M.: The epistemological status of computer-assisted proofs. Philos. Math. 16, 374–387 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, A., Zalta, E.N.: An alternative theory of nonexistent objects. J. Philos. Logic 9(3), 297–313 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, Ch.: Actualism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2011 Edition), Zalta, E. N. (ed.), URL=http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/actualism/ (2011)

  • Nelson, M., Zalta, E.N.: Bennett and “proxy actualism”. Philos. Stud. 142, 277–291 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Solzhenitsyn, A.: Cancer Ward. Trans. Bethell, N., Burg, D. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, New York (2001 [1968])

  • Stalnaker, R.: Assertion revisited: on the interpretation of two-dimensional modal semantic. Philos. Stud. 118, 299–322 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.: Mere Possibilities: Metaphysical Foundations of Modal Semantics. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, H.: Logos, logic, and logistiké. Minn. Stud. Philos. Sci. 11, 238–259 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetter, B.: Recent work: modality without possible worlds. Analysis 71(4), 742–754 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H.: Consistency in mathematics. Rice Inst. Pamphlet 16, 245–265 (1929)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, R.: The things that aren’t actually there. Philos. Stud. 152, 155–166 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yost, D., Kaye, A.L.: An attempt to prepare a chloride or fluoride of xenon. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 55, 3890–3892 (1933)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalta, E.: Abstract Objects: An Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics. Reidel, Dordrecht (1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to an anonymous referee of this journal for his or her very helpful comments. István Hargittai, in his publications and personal correspondence, contributed much to my understanding of the discoveries discussed in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amihud Gilead.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilead, A. Pure possibilities and some striking scientific discoveries. Found Chem 16, 149–163 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-013-9190-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-013-9190-4

Keywords

Navigation