Advertisement

Foundations of Chemistry

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 185–197 | Cite as

To mathematize, or not to mathematize chemistry

  • Guillermo RestrepoEmail author
Article

Abstract

By analysing a contemporary criticism to the so called “mathematical chemistry”, we discuss what we understand by mathematizing chemistry and its implications. We then pass to ponder on some positions on the subject by considering the cases of Laszlo, Venel and Diderot, opponents to the idea of mathematization of chemistry. In contrast, we analyse some scholars’ ideas on the fruitful relationship between mathematics and chemistry; here Dirac and Brown are considered. Finally, we mention that the mathematical–chemistry relationship should be considered beyond the mere aspect of whether chemistry is or not able to be mathematized. This discussion is based upon opinions by Kant and Comte, the first one having two positions on chemistry based upon mathematics and the latter mooting the idea of doing chemistry with mathematical spirit.

Keywords

Mathematica chemistry Mathematics Chemistry Kant Comte 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author thanks J. L. Villaveces (Universidad de los Andes, Colombia), D. J. Klein (Texas A&M University at Galveston, USA) and Rom Harré (Georgetown University, USA and London School of Economics, UK) for their valuable comments, ideas, and suggestions, which have been included in this manuscript. The author also thanks J. Schummer (Germany) for his valuable comments to the first drafts of this paper.

References

  1. Balaban, A.T.: Reflections about mathematical chemistry. Found. Chem. 7, 289–306 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourdeau, M.: Auguste Comte. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (summer 2011 edition). URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2011/entries/comte/ (2011)
  3. Brown, A.C.: On the theory of isomeric compounds. J. Chem. Soc. 18, 230–245 (1865) (this paper is a reprint, the original was published in Brown, A.C.: On the theory of isomeric compounds. T. Roy. Soc. Edin. 23, 707 (1864))Google Scholar
  4. Brown, A.C.: Address to the chemical section. Report of the Forty-Fourth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science. http://archive.org/stream/reportofbritisha75brit#page/n5/mode/2up (1875). Accessed 20 June 2012
  5. Comte, A.: The Positive Philosophy of Auguste Comte (ed. and trans. by H. Martineau). Kegan Paul, London (1893)Google Scholar
  6. Dirac, P.A.M.: Quantum mechanics of many-electron systems. Proc. R. Soc. A. 123, 714–733 (1929)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Förster, E. (trans. and ed.): Kant’s Opus Postumum. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  8. Gillispie, C.C.: The Edge of Objectivity. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1960)Google Scholar
  9. Kant, I.: Akademieausgabe von Immanuel Kants Gesammelten Werken Bände und Verknüpfungen zu den Inhaltsverzeichnissen. Korpora.org. http://www.korpora.org/kant/verzeichnisse-gesamt.html (1900–2000). Accessed 20 June 2012
  10. Klein, D.J.: Personal communicationGoogle Scholar
  11. Klotz, I.M., Rosenberg, R.M.: Chemical thermodynamics, basic concepts and methods. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Laszlo, P.: Circulation of concepts. Found. Chem. 1, 225–238 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Latour, B.: Science in action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  14. Leal, W., Restrepo, G., Bernal, A.: A network study of chemical elements: from binary compounds to chemical trends. MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 68, 411–436 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. Liegener, C., Del Re, G.: Chemistry vs. physics, the reduction myth, and the unity of science. J. Gen. Philos. Sci. 18, 165–174 (1987)Google Scholar
  16. Lombardi, O., Labarca, M.: The ontological autonomy of the chemical world. Found. Chem. 7, 125–148 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mainzer, K.: Computational and mathematical models in chemistry, epistemic foundations and new perspectives of research. In: Janich, P., Psarros, N. (eds.) The Autonomy of Chemistry, 3rd Erlenmeyer–Colloquy for the Philosophy of Chemistry, pp. 33–50. Königshausen & Neumann, Würzburg (1998)Google Scholar
  18. Mirkin, B.: Mathematical classification and clustering. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Restrepo, G., Villaveces, J.L.: Chemistry, a lingua philosophica. Found. Chem. 13, 233–249 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Restrepo, G., Villaveces, J.L.: Mathematical thinking in chemistry. HYLE 18, 3–22 (2012a)Google Scholar
  21. Scerri, E.R.: The electronic configuration model, quantum mechanics and reduction. Brit. J. Philos. Sci. 42, 309–325 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scerri, E.R.: Has chemistry been at least approximately reduced to quantum mechanics? Proc. Biennial Meet. Philos. Sci. Assoc. 1, 160–170 (1994)Google Scholar
  23. Scerri, E.: The ambiguity of reduction. HYLE 13, 67–81 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. Schummer, J.: The chemical core of chemistry I, a conceptual approach. HYLE 4, 129–162 (1998)Google Scholar
  25. Smith, D.E.: History of mathematics. General survey of the history of elementary mathematics, vol. I. Dover, New York (1958)Google Scholar
  26. Trinajstić, N.: Mathematics and chemistry—the unlikely partners. In: Rouvray, D.H. (ed.) Concepts in Chemistry, A Contemporary Challenge, pp. 17–39. Research Studies Press, Somerset (1997)Google Scholar
  27. Trinajstić, N., Gutman, I.: Mathematical chemistry. Croat. Chem. Acta 75, 329–356 (2002)Google Scholar
  28. Van Brakel, J.: Kant’s legacy for the philosophy of chemistry. In: Baird, D., Scerri, E. (eds.) Philosophy of Chemistry, pp. 69–91. Springer, Berlin (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weyl, H.: The mathematical way of thinking. Science 92, 437–446 (1940)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Interdisciplinary Research InstituteUniversidad de PamplonaBogotáColombia
  2. 2.Laboratorio de Química TeóricaUniversidad de PamplonaPamplonaColombia

Personalised recommendations