Periodic patterns: the Group (n) and Group (n + 10) linkage
- 212 Downloads
The early Periodic Tables displayed an 8-Group system. Though we now use an 18-Group array, the old versions were based on evidence of similarities between what we now label as Group (n) and the corresponding Group (n + 10). As part of a series on patterns in the Periodic Table, in this contribution, these similarities are explored for the first time in a systematic manner. Pourbaix (Eh–pH) diagrams have been found particularly useful in this context.
KeywordsPeriodic table Elements
An anonymous referee is thanked for helpful comments which led to a significant improvement of the manuscript. In this study, the series of new consistent Pourbaix (Eh–pH) diagrams in The Aqueous Chemistry of the Elements by Schweizer and Pesterfield (2010) was a useful source of comparative information. For details on specific compounds, Patnaik’s Handbook of Inorganic Chemicals (2003) and Greenwood and Earnshaw’s Chemistry of the Elements (1997) were helpful.
- Greenwood, N.N., Earnshaw, A.: Chemistry of the Elements, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (1997)Google Scholar
- Laing, M.: The periodic table—again. Educ. Chem. 26, 177–178 (1989b)Google Scholar
- Mingos, D.M.P.: Essential trends in inorganic chemistry. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)Google Scholar
- Patnaik, P.: Handbook of Inorganic Chemicals. McGraw-Hill, New York (2003)Google Scholar
- Rayner-Canham, G.: Isodiagonality in the periodic table. Found. Chem. 13, 121–129 (2011)Google Scholar
- Scerri, E.: The Periodic Table: Its Story and Its Significance. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006)Google Scholar
- Schweizer, G.K., Pesterfield, L.L.: Aqueous Chemistry of the Elements. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar