Advertisement

Foundations of Chemistry

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 225–228 | Cite as

Internal realism and the problem of ontological autonomy: a critical note on Lombardi and Labarca

  • Alexandru ManafuEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses the proposal made by Lombardi and Labarca (Found Chem 7:125–148, 2005) that internal realism can secure the ontological autonomy of chemistry. I argue that internal realism is not, by itself, sufficient to accomplish this task. The fact that conceptual schemes may differ with respect to their theoretical virtues, and the possibility that the relations between them may be reductive undermine the premise that each conceptual scheme has an equal right to define its own ontology, which is a key premise in Lombardi and Labarca’s proposal.

Keywords

Autonomy of chemistry Internal realism Conceptual schemes Reduction of chemistry to physics Ontological rights 

References

  1. Batterman, R.: Intertheory relations in physics. In: Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/physics-interrelate/ (2008)
  2. Kemeny, J.G., Oppenheim, P.: On reduction. Philos. Stud. 7, 6–18 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kim, J.: Physicalism, or something near enough. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2005)Google Scholar
  4. Lombardi, O., Labarca, M.: The ontological autonomy of the chemical world. Found. Chem. 7, 125–148 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lombardi, O., Labarca, M.: The ontological autonomy of the chemical world: response to Needham. Found. Chem. 8, 81–92 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nagel, E.: The structure of science: problems in the logic of scientific explanation. Harcourt, Brace & World (1961)Google Scholar
  7. Needham, P.: Ontological reduction: a comment on Lombardi and Labarca. Found. Chem. 8, 73–80 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Nickles, T.: Two concepts of intertheoretic reduction. J. Philos. 70, 181–201 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Putnam, H.: Reason, truth and history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Putnam, H., Oppenheim, P.: The unity of science as a working hypothesis. Minn. Stud. Philos. Sci. 2, 3–36 (1958)Google Scholar
  11. Vihalemm, R.: The autonomy of chemistry: old and new problems. Found. Chem. 13, 97–107 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Western OntarioLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations