Advertisement

Foundations of Chemistry

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 167–176 | Cite as

Theories of the chemical bond and its true nature

  • G. K. VemulapalliEmail author
Article

Abstract

Two different models for chemical bond were developed almost simultaneously after the Schrödinger formulation of quantum theory. These are known as the valence bond (VB) and molecular orbital (MO) theories. Initially chemists preferred the VB theory and ignored the MO theory. Now the VB theory is almost dropped out of currency. The context of discovery and Linus Pauling’s overpowering influence gave the VB theory its initial advantage. The current universal acceptance of the MO theory is due to its ability to provide direct interpretation of many different types of experiments now being pursued. In current research both localized bonds and delocalized charge distributions play important roles and the MO theory has been successful in giving a good account of both.

Keywords

Chemical bond Linus Pauling R. S. Mulliken Valence bond theory Molecular orbital theory 

Notes

Acknowledgment

I am indebted to Carolyn Vemulapalli for editorial assistance and helpful suggestions and to Dr. J. Murdoch for very useful discussions. I thank the two reviewers for carefully reading and suggesting improvements and also for pointing out the ambiguities in the text sent for review.

References

  1. Berson, J.A.: Chemical Creativity. Wiley, Weinheim (1999)Google Scholar
  2. Brush, S.: Dynamics of theory change in chemistry. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 30, 263–302 (1999). doi: 10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00028-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler, L.: Robert S. Mulliken and the politics of science. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 25, 25–45 (1994)Google Scholar
  4. Coulson, C.A., McWeeny, R.: Coulson’s Valence, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York (1979)Google Scholar
  5. Gavroglu, K., Simões, A.: The Germans, the Americans and the beginning of quantum chemistry: the confluence of diverging traditions. Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. 25, 47–110 (1994)Google Scholar
  6. Hettema, H.: Quantum Chemistry. World Scientific, Singapore (2000)Google Scholar
  7. Lennard-Jones, J.E.: The electronic structure of some diatomic molecules. Trans. Faraday Soc. 25, 668–686 (1929)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mulliken, R.S.: The assignment of quantum numbers for electrons in molecules. Phys. Rev. 32, 186–222 (1928)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mulliken, R.S.: Life of a Scientist, p. 213. Springer, Berlin (1989)Google Scholar
  10. Park, B.S.: In the “context of pedagogy”: teaching strategy and theory change in quantum chemistry. In: Kaiser, D. (ed.) Pedagogy and the Practice of Science, pp. 287–319. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  11. Pauling, L.: The Nature of the Chemical Bond. Cornell University Press, Ithaca (1960)Google Scholar
  12. Pauling, L., Wilson, E.B.: Introduction of Quantum Mechanics. Dover Publications, New York (1963)Google Scholar
  13. Platt, J.R.: Nobel laureate in chemistry: Robert S. Mulliken. Science 154, 747 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Simões, A., Gavroglu, K.: Quantum chemistry qua applied mathematics. The contribution of Charles Alfred Coulson (1910–1974). Hist. Stud. Phys. Biol. 29, 363–406 (1999)Google Scholar
  15. Slater, J.C.: Quantum Theory of Molecules and Solids, vol. 1. McGraw-Hill, New York (1963)Google Scholar
  16. Vemulapalli, G.K.: Property reduction in chemistry: some lessons. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 988, 90–99 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Woolley, R.G.: The molecular structure conundrum. J. Chem. Educ. 62, 1082 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryThe University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations