Advertisement

Foundations of Chemistry

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 73–80 | Cite as

ONTOLOGICAL REDUCTION: A COMMENT ON LOMBARDI AND LABARCA

  • Paul NeedhamEmail author
Article

Abstract

In a recent article in this journal (Foundations of Chemistry, 7 (2005), 125–148) Lombardi and Labarca call into question a thesis of ontological reduction to which several writers on reduction subscribe despite rejecting a thesis of epistemological reduction. Lombardi and Labarca advocate instead a pluralistic ontology inspired by Putnam’s internal realism. I suggest that it is not necessary to go so far, and that a more critical view of the ontological reduction espoused by the authors they criticise circumvents the need to resort to their radical alternative.

Keywords

Broad Consensus Chemical Description Ontological Dependence Internal Realism Minnesota Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. H. Chang. Preservative Realism and Its Discontents: Revisiting Caloric. Philosophy of Science 70: 902–912, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Duhem Pierre. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theories, trans. by Philip Wiener, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1954Google Scholar
  3. P.K. Feyerabend. Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism. In H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 3, 28–97, 1962Google Scholar
  4. H. Kincaid. Molecular Biology and the Unity of Science. Philosophy of Science 57: 575–593, 1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. H.M. Lacey. The Philosophical Intelligibility of Absolute Space: A Study of Newtonian Argument. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 21: 317–342, 1970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. O. Lombardi and L. Martín. The Ontological Autonomy of the Chemical World. Foundations of Chemistry 7: 125–148, 2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. G. Maxwell. The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities. In H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol 3. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 12–13, 1962Google Scholar
  8. Russell, Bertrand. “On Denoting”, Mind. 14, 479–493. Reprinted in Logic and Knowledge, R.C. Marsh (Ed.), London: George, Allen and Unwin, 1956, pp. 41–56, 1905Google Scholar
  9. E. Sober. The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press, 1985Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of StockholmStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations