ONTOLOGICAL REDUCTION: A COMMENT ON LOMBARDI AND LABARCA
- 90 Downloads
In a recent article in this journal (Foundations of Chemistry, 7 (2005), 125–148) Lombardi and Labarca call into question a thesis of ontological reduction to which several writers on reduction subscribe despite rejecting a thesis of epistemological reduction. Lombardi and Labarca advocate instead a pluralistic ontology inspired by Putnam’s internal realism. I suggest that it is not necessary to go so far, and that a more critical view of the ontological reduction espoused by the authors they criticise circumvents the need to resort to their radical alternative.
KeywordsBroad Consensus Chemical Description Ontological Dependence Internal Realism Minnesota Study
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Duhem Pierre. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theories, trans. by Philip Wiener, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1954Google Scholar
- P.K. Feyerabend. Explanation, Reduction, and Empiricism. In H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 3, 28–97, 1962Google Scholar
- G. Maxwell. The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities. In H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (Eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol 3. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 12–13, 1962Google Scholar
- Russell, Bertrand. “On Denoting”, Mind. 14, 479–493. Reprinted in Logic and Knowledge, R.C. Marsh (Ed.), London: George, Allen and Unwin, 1956, pp. 41–56, 1905Google Scholar
- E. Sober. The Nature of Selection: Evolutionary Theory in Philosophical Focus. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press, 1985Google Scholar