Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Constructivism’s New Clothes: The Trivial, the Contingent, and a Progressive Research Programme into the Learning of Science

  • Published:
Foundations of Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Constructivism has been a key referent for research into the learning of science for several decades. There is little doubt that the research into learners’ ideas in science stimulated by the constructivist movement has been voluminous, and a great deal is now known about the way various science topics may commonly be understood by learners of various ages. Despite this significant research effort, there have been serious criticisms of this area of work: in terms of its philosophical underpinning, the validity of its most popular constructs, the limited scope of its focus, and its practical value to science teaching. This paper frames this area of work as a Lakatosian Research Programme (RP), and explores the major criticisms of constructivism from that perspective. It is argued that much of the criticism may be considered as part of the legitimate academic debate expected within any active RP, i.e. arguments about the auxiliary theory making up the ‘protective belt’ of the programme. It is suggested that a shifting focus from constructivism to ‘contingency in learning’ will allow the RP to draw upon a more diverse range of perspectives, each consistent with the existing hard core of the programme, which will provide potentially fruitful directions for future work and ensure the continuity of a progressive RP into learning science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • I.O. Abimbola, The problem of terminology in the study of student conceptions in science. Science Education 72 (1988) 175-184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B Andersson, The experiential gestalt of causation: a common core to pupils’ preconceptions in science. European Journal of Science Education 8 (1986) 155-171

    Google Scholar 

  • C.R. Ault, J.D. Novak and D.B. Gowin, Constructing Vee Maps for Clinical Interviews on Molecule Concepts. Science Education 68 (1984) 441-462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Bachelard. The Philosophy of No: a philosophy of the scientific mind. New York: Orion Press (1968) (original French edition published in 1940).

  • V. Barker. Beyond appearances: students’ misconceptions about basic chemical ideas, A report prepared for the Royal Society of Chemistry, London: Education Division, Royal Society of Chemistry (2000). Available on LearnNet at www.chemsoc.org/LearnNet.

  • B. Bell, Interviewing: a technique for assessing science knowledge. In: M. Glynn Shawn and R Duit (eds.) Learning Science in the Schools: Research Reforming Practice. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1995) pp. 347-364

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Bell, A. Jones and M. Car, The development of the recent National new Zealand Science Curriculum. Studies in Science Education 26 (1995) 73-105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Michell Beld, Constructing a collaboration: a conversation with Egon G. Guba and Y.S. Lincoln. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 7 (1994) 99-115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Black. Introduction to P. Adey, with J. Bliss, J. Head and M. Shayer, (Eds.), Adolescent Development and School Science, pp. 1–4. Lewes (East Sussex): The Falmer Press, 1989.

  • P.J. Black, and A.M. Lucas (Eds.), Children’s Informal Ideas in Science. London: Routledge, 1993.

  • P. Carmichael, R. Driver, B. Holding, I. Phillips, D. Twigger, and M. Watts, Research on Students’ Conceptions in Science: A Bibliography, Children’s Learning in Science Research Group, Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds, 1990. (plus addenda, 1991, 1992).

  • M.T.H. Chi, Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: examples from learning and discovery in science. In: R.N. Giere (ed.) Cognitive Models in Science.. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (1992) pp. 129-186

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Claxton. Minitheories: a preliminary model for learning science, Chapter 3 of Paul J. Black and A.M. Lucas (Eds.), Children’s Informal Ideas in Science., pp. 45–61. London: Routledge, 1993.

  • A Cromer, Connected Knowledge: Science, Philosophy and Education. Oxford: Oxford University Press (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Driver, The Pupil as Scientist?. Milton Keynes: Open University Press (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Driver. Students’ Conceptions and the Learning of Science. International Journal of Science Education, 11: (special issue), 481–490, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Driver and J. Easley, Pupils and Paradigms: A Review of Literature Related to Concept Development in Adolescent Science Students. Studies in Science Education 5 (1978) 61-84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Driver and G. Erickson, Theories-in-Action: Some Theoretical and Empirical Issues in the Study of Students’ Conceptual Frameworks in Science. Studies in Science Education 10 (1983) 37-60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Children’s Ideas in Science. Milton Keynes: Open University Press (1985a).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Driver, E. Guesne, and A. Tiberghien. Some Features of Children’s Ideas and Their Implications for Teaching, in Driver, et al., 1985a, 193–201, 1985b.

  • R. Driver and V. Oldham, A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education 13 (1986) 105-122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Driver, A. Squires, P. Rushworth and V. Wood-Robinson, Making Sense of Secondary Science: research into children’s ideas. London: Routledge (1994a).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Driver, J. Leach, P. Scott and C. Wood-Robinson, Young people’s understanding of science concepts: implications of cross-age studies for curriculum planning. Studies in Science Education 24 (1994b) 75-100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Driver, H. Asoko, J. Leach, E. Mortimer and P. Scott, Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom.. Oxford: Paper Presented at the British Educational Research Association (1994c).

    Google Scholar 

  • Philosophy of Science, Cognitive Psychology, and Educational Theory and Practice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Edwards and N. Mercer, Common Knowledge: The Development of Understanding in the Classroom. London: Routledge (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Erickson Research programmes and the student science learning literature. In R. Millar, J. Leach, and J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving Science Education: the Contribution of Research, Buckingham UK: Open University Press, 2000.

  • The Content of Science: A Constructivist Approach to its Teaching and Learning. London: Falmer Press (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Fowler and D.W. Brooks, Connectivism. Journal of Chemical Education 68 (1991) 748-751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.J. Gergen, An Invitation to Social Construction. London: SAGE Publications (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.K. Gilbert, The development of educational research in the physical sciences in some European countries. In: H.-J. Schmidt (ed.) Problem Solving and Misconceptions in Chemistry and Physics. Dortmund, Germany: International Council of Associations for Science Education (1994) pp. 15-28

    Google Scholar 

  • J.K. Gilbert, R.J. Osborne and P.J. Fensham, Children’s Science and its Consequences for Teaching. Science Education 66 (1982) 623-633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.K. Gilbert and D.J. Swift, Towards a Lakatosian Analysis of the Piagetian and Alternative Conceptions Research Programs. Science Education 69 (1985) 681-696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.K. Gilbert and D.M. Watts, Concepts, misconceptions and alternative conceptions: changing perspectives in science education. Studies in Science Education 10 (1983) 61-98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. von Glasersfeld, Cognition, Construction of Knowledge, and Teaching. Synthese 80 (1989) 121-140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Glasersfeld von, Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In: Kenneth Tobin (ed.) The Practice of Constuctivism in Science Education.. Hillsdale New Jersey: Larwence Erlbaum Associates (1993) pp. 23-38

    Google Scholar 

  • R.G. Good, J.H. Wandersee and John St. Julien, Cautionary notes on the appeal of the new “ism” (constructivism) in science education. In: K. Tobin (ed.) The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education. Hillsdale New Jersey: Larwence Erlbaum Associates (1993) pp. 71-87

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Hammer Misconceptions or p-prims: how might alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions? Paper Presented at the Conference of the American Educational Research Association, April 1996.

  • W. Harlen, Effective Teaching of Science: A Review of Research. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • A.G. Harrison and D.F. Treagust, Learning About Atoms, Molecules, and Chemical Bonds: A Case Study of Multiple-Model Use in Grade 11 Chemistry. Science Education 84 (2000) 352-381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.G.A’B. Hewson, The role of intellectual environment in the origins of conceptions: an exploratory study. In: L.H.T. West and A. Leon Pines (eds.) Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change.. London: Academic Press Inc. (1985) pp. 153-161

    Google Scholar 

  • P.W. Hewson and M.G. Hennessey. Making status explicit: a case study of conceptual change. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg and H. Niedderer (eds) (1992) Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies, pp. 176–187, Kiel: I.P.N. (Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschraften), 1992.

  • C.J. Howe, Conceptual Structure in Childhood and Adolescence: The Case of Everyday Physics. London: Routledge (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • E.W. Jenkins, Research in Science Education: Time for a Health Check?. Studies in Science Education 35 (2000) 1-25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. Johnson, Progression in Children’s Understanding of a ‘Basic’ Particle Theory: A Longitudinal Study. International Journal of Science Education 20 (1998) 393-412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P.M. Johnson and R Gott, Constructivism and Evidence from Children’s Ideas. Science Education 80 (1996) 561-577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.H. Johnstone, Some Messages for Teachers and Examiners: An Information Processing Model, Research in Assessment VII: Assessment of Chemistry in Schools. London: Royal Society of Chemistry Education Division (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • A.H. Johnstone, Why is Science Difficult to Learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 7 (1991) 75-83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A.H. Johnstone, Teaching of Chemistry – Logical or Psychological?. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe 1 (2000) 9-15

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Kelly. A Theory of Personality: The Psychology of Personal Constructs, New York: W.W. Norton & Company (taken from The Psychology of Personal Constructs, first published 1955), 1963.

  • V. Kind and K.S. Taber, Teaching School Science. Falmer: Routledge (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Lakatos (1970) Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrove (Eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965, Volume 4, pp. 91–196. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.

  • I. Lakatos. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Philosophical Papers, Volume 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978.

  • I. Lakatos. (1978{1973}) Science and Pseudoscience, in Lakatos (1978), pp. 1–7.

  • I. Lakatos. (1978{1974}) Popper on Demacraction and Induction, in Lakatos (1978), pp. 139–167.

  • I. Lakatos and Zahar (1978{1976}) Why Did Copernicus’s Research Programme Supercede Ptolemy’s?, in Lakatos (1978), pp. 168–192.

  • J. Leach and P. Scott, Designing and Evaluating Science Teaching Sequences: An Approach Drawing Upon the Concept of Learning Demand and a Social Constructivist Perspective on Learning. Studies in Science Education 38 (2002) 115-142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.R. Matthews, Constructivism and Science Education: Some Epistemological Problems. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2 (1993) 359-370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.R. Matthews, Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Constructivism in Science Education: A Philosophical Examination. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Millar, Constructive Criticisms. International Journal of Science Education 11 (1989) 587-596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teaching Science for Understanding: A human constructivist view. San Diego California: Academic Press (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • E.F. Mortimer, Conceptual Change or Conceptual Profile Change?. Science and Education 4 (1995) 267-285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Ogborn, G. Kress, I. Martins and K. McGillicuddy, Explaining Science in the Classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Osborne and P. Freyberg, Learning in Science: The Implications of Children’s Science. Auckland: Heinemann (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Petri and H. Niedderer, A Learning Pathway in High-school Level Quantum Atomic Physics. International Journal of Science Education 20 (1998) 1075-1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Piaget. Psychology and Epistemology: Towards a Theory of Knowledge (translated from the French by P.A. Wells), Harmondsworth: Penguin (original French edition, 1970), 1972.

  • J. Piaget. The Child’s Conception of The World (tr. J & A Tomlinson), St. Albans, U.K.: Granada (first published in Great Britain by Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1929), 1973.

  • D.C. Phillips, Philosophy, Science and Social Enquiry: Contemporary Methodological Controversies in Social Science and Related Applied Fields of Research. Oxford: Pergamon Press (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • D.C. Phillips, Coming to Grips with Radical Social Constructivisms. Science & Education 6 (1997) 85-104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Pope and P. Denicolo, Intuitive Theories – A Researcher’s Dilemma: Some Practical Methodological Implications. British Educational Research Journal 12 (1986) 153-166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Pope and J. Gilbert, Personal Experience and the Construction of Knowledge in Science. Science Education 67 (1983) 193-203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Potter, Representing Reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: SAGE Publications (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • W-M. Roth. Artificial Neural Networks for Modeling Knowing and Learning in Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(1): 63–80, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • E.R. Scerri. Philosophical Confusion in Chemical Education Research. Journal of Chemical Education 80(20): 468–474, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • P.H. Scott. Pathways in learning science: a case study of the development of one student’s ideas relating to the structure of matter. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in Physics Learning: theoretical issues and empirical studies, pp. 203–224. Kiel: I.P.N. (Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschraften), 1992.

  • P. Scott, Teacher Talk and Meaning Making in Science Classrooms: A Review of Studies from a Vygotskian Perspective. Studies in Science Education 32 (1998) 45-80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Schwedes and D. Schmidt. Conceptual change: a case study and theoretical comments. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in Physics Learning: Theoretical Issues and Empirical Studies, pp. 188–292, Kiel: I.P.N. (Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschraften), 1992.

  • J. Solomon, Social Influences on the Construction of Pupils’ Understanding of Science. Studies in Science Education 14 (1987) 63-82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Solomon, Getting to Know about Energy – in School and Society. London: Falmer Press (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Solomon, Four frames for a field. In: P.J. Black and A.M. Lucas (eds.) Children’s Informal Ideas in Science. London: Routledge (1993a) pp. 1-19

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Solomon, The social construction of children’s scientific knowledge. In: P.J. Black and A.M. Lucas (eds.) Children’s Informal Ideas in Science. London: Routledge (1993b) pp. 85-101

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Solomon, The Rise and Fall of Constructivism. Studies in Science Education 23 (1994) 1-19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.A. Suchting, Constructivism Deconstructed. Science and Education 1 (1992) 223-254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.S. Taber, Development of Student Understanding: A Case Study of Stability and Lability in Cognitive Structure. Research in Science and Technological Education 13 (1995) 87-97

    Google Scholar 

  • K.S. Taber, An Alternative Conceptual Framework From Chemistry Education. International Journal of Science Education 20 (1998) 597-608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.S. Taber, Case Studies and Generalisability – Grounded Theory and Research in Science Education. International Journal of Science Education 22 (2000a) 469-487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.S. Taber, Multiple Frameworks?: Evidence of Manifold Conceptions in Individual Cognitive Structure. International Journal of Science Education 22 (2000b) 399-417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.S. Taber, Shifting Sands: A Case Study of Conceptual Development as Competition Between Alternative Conceptions. International Journal of Science Education 23 (2001a) 731-753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.S. Taber, Building the Structural Concepts of Chemistry: Some Considerations From Educational Research. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice in Europe 2 (2001b) 123-158

    Google Scholar 

  • K.S Taber, Chemical Misconceptions – Prevention, Diagnosis and Cure. London: Royal Society of Chemistry (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • K.S. Taber, The Atom in the Chemistry Curriculum: Fundamental Concept, Teaching Model or Epistemological Obstacle?. Foundations of Chemistry 5 (2003) 43-84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Tobin, Referents for Making Sense of Science Teaching. International Journal of Science Education 15 (1993a) 241-254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Practice of Constructivism in Science Education. Hillsdale New Jersey: Larwence Erlbaum Associates (1993b).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Tytler, Children’s Conceptions of Air Pressure: Exploring the Nature of Conceptual Change. International Journal of Science Education 20 (1998) 929-954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Watts, From Concept Maps to Curriculum Signposts. Physics Education 23 (1988) 74-79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Watts and J. Gilbert, Enigmas in School Science: Students’ Conceptions for Scientifically Associated Words. Research in Science and Technological Education 1 (1983) 161-171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.M. Watts and M.L. Pope. A Lakatosian View of the Young Personal Scientist, paper to the British Conference on Personal Construct Psychology, Manchester (UMIST), September 1982.

  • M. Watts and K.S. Taber. An Explanatory Gestalt of Essence: Students’ Conceptions of the ‘Natural’ in Physical Phenomena. International Journal of Science Education 18(8), 939–954, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Yager, Constructivism and the learning of science. In: M. Glynn Shawn and R Duit (eds.) (1995) Learning Science in the Schools: Research Reforming Practice. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1995) pp. 35-58

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, 184 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2PH, United Kingtem

    Keith S. Taber

Authors
  1. Keith S. Taber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith S. Taber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taber, K.S. Constructivism’s New Clothes: The Trivial, the Contingent, and a Progressive Research Programme into the Learning of Science. Found Chem 8, 189–219 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-005-4536-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10698-005-4536-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation