A policy management game for mass casualty incidents: an experimental study

Abstract

The number of complex and unique mass casualty incidents has increased due to natural and technological disasters as well as man-made disasters such as political instabilities, economic recession, and terrorism. Thus, health care policy-makers such as the Austrian Samaritan Organization have been continuously improving the training of emergency staff to enable them to quickly evacuate an emergency site, to minimize the number of fatalities at the incident site, and to decrease the patients’ waiting time for treatment. We developed a policy management game to provide a training tool for emergency staff to support such policy-makers. In addition, with this game students can be educated on scheduling and planning techniques such as simulation, queuing theory, and resource allocation. To investigate the potential of our policy management game, we conducted an experimental study with 96 participants including students, practitioners from health care services, and researchers. They acted as incident commanders to decide on sending medical staff to triage, to different treatment rooms for care and to on-site transportation, as well as to transportation to hospitals during three game runs. The participants rated the general structure and organization of the experiment as high. The performance was also improved by many participants during the experiment. We found differences in performance among the different participant groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Batty M (2008) The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science 319:769–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker O, Feit T, Hofer V, Leopold-Wildburger U, Selten R (2007) Educational effects in an experiment with the management game SINTO-Market. Cent Eur J Oper Res Econ 15(4):301–308

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Benesch T (2008) Der Schlüssel zur Statistik: datenbeurteilung mithilfe von SPSS. Facultas Verlag

  4. Blötz U (2005) Planspiele in der beruflichen Bildung. W. Bertelsmann Verlag, Bielefeld

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brailsford S, Kozan E, Rauner MS (2012) Health care management. Flex Serv Manuf J 24(4):375–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brandl B, Leopold-Wildburger U, Mietek A, Pickl S (2010) How do commission rates influence a firm’s success? Statistical analysis of a corporate strategy simulation experiment. CEJOR 18(4):553–566

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Brandt H (2008) Planung und entwicklung von psychologischen tests und fragebogen. Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Springer, Berlin, pp 27–72

    Google Scholar 

  8. Camerer CF (2007) Neuroeconomics: using neuroscience to make economic predictions. Econ J 117(519):C26–C42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carriere JSA, Cheyne JA, Smilek D (2008) Everyday attention lapses and memory failures: the affective consequences of mindlessness. Conscious Cogn 17(3):835–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters - CRED (2013) EM-DAT: the international disaster database. Retrieved October 21, 2013, from http://www.emdat.be/

  11. Dieleman H, Huisingh D (2006) Games by which to learn and teach about sustainable development: exploring the relevance of games and experiential learning for sustainability. J Clean Prod 14(9):837–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dill WR, Doppelt N (1963) The acquisition of experience in a complex management game. Manage Sci 10(1):30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Drucker PF (2006) Classic drucker: essential wisdom of peter drucker from the pages of harvard business review. Harvard Business Press, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fischer KW (2009) Mind, brain, and education: building a scientific groundwork for learning and teaching. Mind Brain Educ 3(1):3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Garris R, Ahlers R, Driskell J (2002) Games, motivation, and learning: a research and practice model. Simul Gaming 33(4):441–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Geier B (2006) Evaluation eines netzbasierten unternehmensplanspiels—Eine problemorientierte lernumgebung für die kaufmännische Aus- und Weiterbildung. Doktorarbeit, LMU, München

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hans E, Nieberg T (2007) Operating room manager game. Inf Trans Educ 8(1):25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansak P, Petutschnigg B, Böbel M, Hündorf H-P, Lipp R, Veith J (2003) LPN-San österreich—lehrbuch für rettungssanitäter, betriebssanitäter und bundesheersanitäter. Stumpf and Kossendey, Edewecht

    Google Scholar 

  19. Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G (2003) The health utilities index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes 1:54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Koehler G, Foley D, Jones M (1992) A computer simulation of a California casualty collection point used to respond to a major earthquake. Prehosp Disaster Med 7(4):339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kolb D (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kotz D (2013) Injury toll from Marathon bombs reduced to 264. The Boston Globe, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kraus M, Rauner MS, Schwarz S (2010) Hospital management games: a taxonomy and extensive review. CEJOR 18(4):567–591

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Lane J, Slavin S, Ziv A (2001) Simulation in medical education: a review. Simul Gaming 32(3):297–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lown BA (2013) Reflections on compassion in the midst of violence. J Gen Intern Med 28(12):1554–1555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Marot J (2013) Zugunglück in Spanien: Lokführer viel zu schnell unterwegs. Der Standard

  27. Marx F, Binsfeld M, Franke T (2013) Medizinischer Einsatz bei der Loveparade 2010 in Duisburg. Der Anaesthesist 62(12):1010–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ozcan YA (2008) Health care benchmarking and performance evaluation, an assessment using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Springer, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Ozcan YA (2009) Quantitative methods in health care management: techniques and applications. Jossey-Bass/Wiley, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  30. Österreichisches Rotes Kreuz (2007) Vorschriften. Retrieved November 26, 2013, from http://vorschriften.roteskreuz.at

  31. Paseka A (2008) Wie Kinder zu Mädchen und Buben werden. Einige Erkenntnisse aus der Sozialisations-und Geschlechterforschung. In Geschlecht lernen. Innsbruck: Studienverlag, pp 15–31

  32. Peric N, Herdlicka T (2012) Das SanHiSt-Planspiel für den Aufbau einer Sanitätshilfsstelle bei Großschadenseinsätzen—Eine experimentelle Analyse des simulationsbasierten Managementplanspiels zur Unterstützung des effektiven und effizienten Einsatzes von Rettungsdiensten. Vienna: Master Thesis, University of Vienna

  33. Pfaff MS, Drury JL, Klein GL, More LD, Moon SP, Liu Y (2010) Weighing decisions: aiding emergency response decision making via option awareness. Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE Technologies for Homeland Security Conference, Waltham, MA, pp 251–257

  34. Pfaff MS, Klein GL, Drury JL, Moon SP, Liu Y, Entezari SO (2013) Supporting complex decision making through option awareness. J Cogn Eng Decis Mak 7(2):155–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Pidd M (2004) Computer simulation in management science. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pidgeon N, O’Leary M (2000) An-made disasters: why technology and organizations (sometimes) fail. Saf Sci 34(1):15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pinedo M (2008) Scheduling: theory, algorithms, and systems. Springer, Newton

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rabin R, de Charro F (2001) EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol group. Annu Med 33(5):337–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rapoport A, Dale PS (1966) The “end” and “start” effects in iterated prisoner’s dilemma. J Confl Resolut 10(3):363–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rauner MS, Kraus M, Schwarz S (2008) Competition under different reimbursement systems: the concept of an internet-based hospital management game. Eur J Oper Res 185(3):948–963

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Rauner MS, Schaffhauser-Linzatti M, Niessner H (2012) Resource planning for ambulance services in mass casualty incidents: a DES-based policy model. Health Care Manag Sci 15(3):254–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Rempe A, Klösters K (2006) Das Planspiel als Entscheidungstraining. W. Kohlhammer-Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  43. Rinaldi SM, Peerenboom JP, Kelly TK (2001) Identifying, understanding, and analyzing critical infrastructure interdependencies. Control Syst IEEE 21(6):11–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Schulmeister R (1996) Grundlagen hypermedialer Lernsysteme. Theorie - Didaktik - Design. Addison-Wesley, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sefrin P (2005) Die Rolle des Behandlungsplatzes bei Massenanfall von Verletzten. Der Notarzt 21(06):189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Smith SW, Portelli I, Narzisi G, Nelson LS, Menges F, Rekow ED, Mincer JS, Mishra B, Goldfrank LR (2009) A novel approach to multihazard modeling and simulation. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 3(2):75–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Solecki W, Seto KC, Marcotullio PJ (2013) It’s time for an urbanization science. Environ: Sci Policy Sustain Dev 55(1):12–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Solga H, Pfahl L (2009) Doing Gender Im Technisch-Naturwissen-Schaftlichen Bereich. Förderung des Nachwuchses In Technik und Naturwissenschaft. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 155–218

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. Streufert S, Satish U, Barach P (2001) Improving medical care: the use of simulation technology. Simul Gaming 32(2):164–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Vissers J, Beech R (eds) (2005) Health operations management: patient flow logistics in health care (routledge health management). Routledge Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  51. XJ Technologies Company (2007) AnyLogic 6—user’s guide

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marion S. Rauner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rauner, M.S., Niessner, H., Leopold-Wildburger, U. et al. A policy management game for mass casualty incidents: an experimental study. Flex Serv Manuf J 28, 336–365 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-014-9205-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Policy simulator
  • Management game
  • Health care
  • Mass casuality incidents
  • Experimental study