Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sustainable reverse logistics network design for household plastic waste

  • Published:
Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plastic recycling is a legal requirement and can yield environmental benefits. In the Netherlands, there is a complex network of various collection methods, separation centers, sorting centers and reprocessors. The first step of the recycling system, separating plastics from other waste, can occur within households (source-separation) or in separation centers (post-separation), making a difference in collection channel choice and technology requirements. The purpose of this paper is to provide decision support on choosing the most suitable combination of separation methods in the Netherlands. Decision support is given through optimized reverse logistics network design which makes the overall recycling system more efficient and sustainable, while taking into account the interests of various stakeholders (municipalities, households, etc.). A mixed integer linear programming (MILP) model, which minimizes both transportation cost and environmental impact, is used in this network design. The research follows the approach of scenario study; the baseline scenario is the current situation and other scenarios are designed with various strategic alternatives. Modeling is conducted by using a graphical optimization tool IBM LogicNet Plus 7.1. Comparing these scenarios, the results show that the current network settings of the baseline situation is efficient in logistics terms but has a potential to adapt to strategic changes, depending on the assumptions regarding availability of the required processing facilities to treat plastic waste. In some of the tested scenarios, a separate collection channel for Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) bottles is cost efficient and saves carbon emission. Although the figures differ depending on the separation method choices of municipalities, our modeling result of all the tested scenarios shows a saving of more than 25 % carbon emission compared to the current network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Separated collected waste at households (e.g. paper, glass, organic waste) not included.

References

  • Ambrose CA, Hooper R, Potter AK, Singh MM (2002) Diversion from landfill: quality products from valuable plastics. Resour Conserv Recycl 36(4):309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arena U, Mastellone ML, Perugini F (2003) Life cycle assessment of a plastic packaging recycling system. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8(2):92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arntzen BC, Brown GG, Harrison TP, Trafton LL (1995) Global supply chain management at digital equipment corporation. Interfaces 25(1):69–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astrup T, Fruergaard T, Ghristensen TH (2009) Recycling of plastic:accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution. Waste Manag Res 27:763–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bautista J, Pereira J (2006) Modeling the problem of locating collection areas for urban waste management. an application to the metropolitan area of Barcelona. Omega 34(6):617–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buclet N (2002) Municipal waste managenent in Europe: European policy between harmonisation and subsidiarity. Kluwer, Dordrecht

  • Cachon G (2009) Carbon footprint and the management of supply chains. The INFORMS annual meeting, San Diego CA

  • Chaabane A, Ramudhin A, Paquet M (2012) Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme. Int J Prod Econ 135:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chilton T, Burnley S, Nesaratnam S (2010) A life cycle assessment of the closed-loop recycling and thermal recovery of post-consumer PET. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(12):1241–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cramer J (2007) Framework agreement between the ministry of environment, the packaging industry and VNG on the approach to the packaging and litter records for the years 2008 /2012

  • Defra (2011) 2011 guidelines to Defra/DECC’s GHG conversion factors for company reporting: methodology paper for emisssion factors. Technical report, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK

  • Ellerman AD, Convery FJ, de Perthuis C (2010) Pricing carbon: the European union emissions trading scheme. Cambridge Univeristy Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • EU (2002) Directive 2008/98/EC of the european parliament and of the council of 19 november 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives

  • Fleischmann M, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, Dekker R, van der Laan E, van Nunen JAEE, Van Wassenhove LN (1997) Quantitative models for reverse logistics: a review. Eur J Oper Res 103(1):1–17

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann M, Beullens P, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, van Wassenhove LN (2001) The impact of product recovery on logistics network design. Prod Oper Manag 10(2):156–173 ISSN 1937–5956

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann M, Bloemhof-Ruward JM, Beullens P, Dekker R (2004) Reverse logistics: quantitative models for closed-loop supply chains. Springer, Berlin

  • Geoffrion AM, Graves GW (1974) Multicommodity distribution system design by Benders decomposition. Manag Sci 20(5):822–844 ISSN 00251909

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez-Torre PL, Adenso-Diaz B (2006) Reverse logistics practices in the glass sector in Spain and Belgium. Int Bus Rev 15(5):527–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heng N, Ungul LU, Mehrdadi N (2008) Recycling and reuse of household plastics. Int J Environ Res 2(1):27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahre M (1995) Household waste collection as a reverse channel: a theoretical perspective. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 25(2):39–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapetanopoulou P, Tagaras G (2010) An empirical investigation of value-added product recovery activities in SMEs using multiple case studies of OEMs and independent remanufacturers. Flexible Ser Manuf J 21(3-4):92–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krikke H, Pappis CP, Tsoulfas GT, Bloemhof J (2002) Extended design principles for closed loop supply chains: optimizing economic, logistic and environmental performance. In: Klose A, Speranza MG, Van Wassenhove LN (eds) Quantitative approaches to distribution logistics and supply chain management, lecture notes 519 in economics and mathematical systems

  • Melo MT, Nickel S, Saldanhada Gama F (2006) Dynamic multi-commodity capacitated facility location: a mathematical modeling framework for strategic supply chain planning. Comput Oper Res 33(1):181–208

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mugnier E, Mairet A, Boucher J (2010) Product carbon footprinting: a study on methodologies and initiatives. Technical report, European Commission DG Environment

  • Simo PASI (2007) Average loads, distances and empty running in road transport-2005. Technical report, EU

  • Pati RK, Vrat P, Kumar P (2008) A goal programming model for paper recycling system. Omega 36(3):405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poelman B (2009) 441 gemeenten in 2009. http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/dossiers/nederland-regionaal/publicaties/artikelen/archief/2009/2009-2666-wm.htm, 2009. CBS.

  • PracticalAction. Recycling plastics. Technical report, The Schumacher Center for Technology & Development, 2010

  • Pro-Europe (2009) Packaging waste legislation in denmark. http://pro-e.org/Denmark

  • QuariguasiFrota Neto J, Bloemhof-Ruwaard JM, van Nunen JAEE, van Heck E (2006) Designing and evaluating sustainable logistics network. Int J Prod Econ 111:195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoma F, Zhang Z, Luo Y, Noche B (2010) Environmental and economical optimization for municipal solid waste collection problems, a modeling and algorithmic approach case study. In: WSEAS international conference on mathematical methods, computational techniques and intellegent systems, Sousse, Tunisia. WSEAS Press

  • Rubio S, Chamorro A, Miranda FJ (2008) Characteristics of the research on reverse logistics (1995–2005). Int J Prod Res 46(4):1099–1120

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava SK (2007) Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. Int J Manag Rev 9(1):53–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb KN, Gupta SM (1997) Disassembly of multiple product structures. Comput Ind Eng 32(4):949–961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong C (2010) A study of plastic recycling supply chain. Technical report. University of Hull Business School and Logistics Institute,

  • WRAP (2007) Realising the value of recovered plastics. Technical report, Waste and Resource Action Program, UK

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is financially supported by TI Food & Nutrition (Top Institute Food and Nutrition, the Netherlands). Data collection is in cooperation with Nedvang (Dutch packaging waste recycling association) and KCN (an expertise center in Wageningen University of plastic recycling). We would like to thank them for all the support they give and also the great help in collecting data for this research. We also thank the anonymous reviewers and Prof. Chee Wong for their valuable comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoyun Bing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bing, X., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J.M. & van der Vorst, J.G.A.J. Sustainable reverse logistics network design for household plastic waste. Flex Serv Manuf J 26, 119–142 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-012-9149-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-012-9149-0

Keywords

Navigation