Abstract
The two important but often conflicting metrics for any primary care practice are: (1) Timely Access and (2) Patient-physician Continuity. Timely access focuses on the ability of a patient to get access to a physician (or provider, in general) as soon as possible. Patient–physician continuity refers to building a strong or permanent relationship between a patient and a specific physician by maximizing patient visits to that physician. In the past decade, a new paradigm called advanced access or open access has been adopted by practices nationwide to encourage physicians to “do today’s work today.” However, most clinics still reserve pre-scheduled slots for long lead-time appointments due to patient preference and clinical necessities. Therefore, an important problem for clinics is how to optimally manage and allocate limited physician capacities as much as possible to meet the two types of demand—pre-scheduled (non-urgent) and open access (urgent, as perceived by the patient)—while simultaneously maximizing timely access and patient–physician continuity. In this study we adapt ideas of manufacturing process flexibility to capacity management in a primary care practice. Flexibility refers to the ability of a primary care physician to see patients of other physicians. We develop generalizable analytical algorithms for capacity allocation for an individual physician and a two physician practice. For multi-physician practices, we use a two-stage stochastic integer programming approach to investigate the value of flexibility. We find that flexibility has the greatest benefit when system workload is balanced, when the physicians have unequal workloads, and when the number of physicians in the practice increases. We also find that partial flexibility, which restricts the number of physicians a patient sees and thereby promotes continuity, simultaneously succeeds in providing high levels of timely access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atlas S, Grant R, Ferris T, Chang Y, Barry M (2009) Patient–Physician connectedness and quality of primary care. Ann Intern Med 150(5):325–326
Bennett K, Baxley E (2009) The effect of a carve out advanced access scheduling system on no show rates. Fam Med 41(1):51–56
Birge J, Loveaux F (1997) Introduction to stochastic programming. Springer, New York, NY
Chua GBA, Chou MC, Teo C-P (2008) On range and response: dimensions of process flexibility. Working paper, NSU
Edington M (eds) (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. The Institute of Medicine Report. Technical report, National Academy Press, Washington DC
Gill JM, Mainous A (1999) The role of provider continuity in preventing hospitalizations. Arch Fam Med 7:352–357
Gill JM, Mainous A, Nsereko M (2000) The effect of continuity of care on emergency department use. Arch Fam Med 9:333–338
Graves SC, Tomlin BT (2003) Process flexibility in supply chains. Manage Sci 49(7):907–919
Green LV, Savin S (2008) Reducing delays for medical appointments: a queueing approach. Oper Res 56(6):1526–1538
Green LV, Savin S, Murray M (2007) Providing timely access to care: what is the right patient panel size? Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 33:211–218
Gupta D, Wang L (2008) Revenue management for a primary-care clinic in the presence of patient choice. Oper Res 56(3):576–592
Gupta D, Potthoff S, Blowers D, Corlett J (2006) Performance metrics for advanced access. J Healthc Manag 51(4):246–259
Hippchen J (2009) Flexbility in primary care, Masters Thesis (Advisors: Hari Balasubramanian and Ana Muriel). Accessible at: http://people.umass.edu/hbalasub/FlexibilityThesis.pdf
Hopp W, Tekin E, Van Oyen MP (2004) Benefits of skill chaining in serial production lines with cross-trained workers. Manage Sci 50(1):83–98
Jordan WC, Graves SC (1995) Principles and benefits of manufacturing process flexibility. Manage Sci 41(4):577–594
Kopach R, DeLaurentis P, Lawley M, Muthuraman K, Ozsen L, Rardin R, Wan H, Intrevado P, Qu X, Willis D (2007) Effects of clinical characteristics on successful open access scheduling. Health Care Manage Sci 10:111–124
Liu N, Ziya S, Kulkarni V (2010) Dynamic scheduling of outpatient appointments under patient no-shows and cancellations. Manuf Serv Oper Manage 12.2:347–365
Muriel A, Somasundaram A, Zhang Y (2006a) Impact of partial manufacturing flexibility on production variability. Manuf Serv Oper Manage 8(2):192–205
Muriel A, Zhang Y, Biller S (2006b) Impact of price postponement on capacity and flexibility investment decisions. Prod Oper Manage 15(2):198–214
Murray M, Berwick DM (2003) Advanced access: reducing waiting and delays in primary care. J Am Med Assoc 289(8):1035–1040
Murray M, Bodenheimer T, Rittenhouse D, Grumbach K (2003) Improving timely access to primary care: case studies of the advanced access model. J Am Med Assoc 289(3):1042–1046
O’Malley A, Cunningham P (2009) Patient experiences with coordination of care: the benefit of continuity and primary care physician as referral source. J Gen Intern Med 24(2):170–177.
Qu X, Rardin R, Williams JAS, Willis D (2007) Matching daily healthcare provider capacity to demand in advanced access scheduling systems. Eur J Oper Res 183(2):812–826
Robinson L, Chen R (2010) A comparison of traditional and open access policies for appointment scheduling. Manuf Serv Oper Manage 122:330–347
Rust G, Ye J, Baltrus P, Daniels E, Adesunloye B, Fryer GE (2008) Practical barriers to timely primary care access. Arch Intern Med 268(15):1705–1710
Solak S, Clarke J-P, Johnson E, Barnes E (2010) Optimization of R&D portfolios under endogenous uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 207(1):420–433
Acknowledgments
This work was funded in part by the grant CMMI 1031550 from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. We would also like to acknowledge two anonymous referees whose valuable comments helped improve the paper. Finally, our sincere thanks to Xiaoling Gao, doctoral student at the University of Massachusetts, who helped with editing of the results.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balasubramanian, H., Muriel, A. & Wang, L. The impact of provider flexibility and capacity allocation on the performance of primary care practices. Flex Serv Manuf J 24, 422–447 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-011-9112-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-011-9112-5