Skip to main content

From mass customization to mass personalization: a strategic transformation


Business and operations strategists have long sought to formulate strategies that would serve profitably for a market of one. Two decades after its conception, there is growing evidence that mass customization strategy is transforming into a mass personalization strategy, making the market of one a reality, at least in select industries. The degree of transformation of a company depends on the extent to which its product is soft, i.e., can be produced electronically. Thus, at the lower end of the personalization spectrum are manufacturing companies engaged in producing hard, configurable products, while on the high end of the spectrum are service companies whose product can be totally configured and delivered electronically. The underlying factors that are enabling this transformation, in our view, are: (1) development of information technologies such as peer to peer (P2P), business to consumer (B2C), and Web 2.0, (2) near-universal availability of the Internet, (3) customer willingness and preparedness to be integrated into the process of product co-design and co-creation, (4) modern manufacturing systems, such as flexible manufacturing and, of course, (5) mass customization tools such as modularity and delayed differentiation, which help reduce manufacturing cost and cycle times and (6) deployment of customer-satisfaction-specific software called customer relationship management (CRM) to engender customer retention. Due to the importance and strategic success of affordable personalization, this issue is dedicated to that theme. The articles included in this issue would, I believe, serve as significant decision support mechanisms for companies pursuing a mass customization and personalization strategy. In addition to providing a brief perspective on articles included in this issue, we also summarize the state of the art of mass customization research.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  • Alptekinoglu A (2004) Mass customization vs. mass production: variety and price competition. Manuf Serv Oper Manage 6(1):98–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan PV, Jacob VS (1996) Genetic algorithms for product design. Manage Sci 42(8):1105–1117

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • (2007) “Breaking the Mold,” Business Week, April 21

  • Chen S, Tseng MM (2007) Aligning demand and supply flexibilities in custom Product co-design. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 19(4)

  • Davis SM (1987) Future perfect. Adison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppen G (1979) Effects of centralization on expected costs in a multi-location newsboy problem. Manage Sci 25(5):498–501

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdows K, DeMeyer A (1990) Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: in search of a new theory. J Oper Manage 9(2):168–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg A, Tang CS (1997) On postponement strategies for product families with multiple points of differentiation. IIE Trans 29(8):641–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao RJ, Xu Q, Du J, Zhang Y, Helander M, Khalid HM, Helo P, Ni C (2007) An analytical approach to affective design with ambient intelligence for mass customization and personalization. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 19(4)

  • Kotler P (1967) Marketing management analysis, planning and control. Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P (1989) From mass marketing to mass customization. Planning Rev 17(5):10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A (1995) Risk-pooling along a fixed delivery route using a dynamic inventory allocation policy. Manage Sci 41(2):344–360

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A (2004) Mass Customization: Metrics and Modularity. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 16(4):287–312

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Gattoufi S, Reisman A (2007) Taxonomic and Content Analyses of Research Strategies and Application Intensity of Mass Customization Publications (1987–2006). Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 19(4c)

  • Kumar A, Stecke KE (2007) Measuring the effectiveness of a mass customization and personalization strategy: a market and organizational-capability based index. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst (19)4b

  • Kumar A, Piller F, Williams HJ (2006) Mass Customization: shattering strategic myths, assumptions. Grand Rapids Business J 24

  • Lee H, Tang C (1997) Modeling the costs and benefits of delayed product differentiation. Manage Sci 43(1):40–53

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Leyuan S, Ólafsson S, Qun C (2001) An optimization framework for product design. Manage Sci 47(12):1681–1692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy JE (1960) Basic marketing: a managerial approach, Irwin. Homewood, IL

  • O’Reilly T (2005) What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Tim O’Reilly Newsletter, September 30.

  • Piller FT (2007) Observations on the present and future of mass customization. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 19(4)

  • Piller FT, Kumar A (2006) For each, their own. Indus Eng 38(9):40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine BJ (1992) Mass customization: the new frontier in business competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine BJ (1993) Mass customizing products and services. Planning Rev 22(4):6–14

    Google Scholar 

  • II Pine BJ, Gilmore J (1999) The experience economy: work is theatre & every business a stage. HBS Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • II Pine BJ, Gilmore J (2007) Authenticity what consumers really want. HBS Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine BJ, Bart V, Boynton AC (1993) Making mass customization work. Harvard Business Rev 71(5):108–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz LB (1989) Model for assessing the value of warehouse risk-pooling over outside supplier leadtime. Manage Sci 35(8):828–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner W (1974) The focused factory. Harvard Business Review, May–June, pp 113–121

  • Smith WR (1956) Product differentiation and marketing segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. Assoc J Market, vol 21, pp. 3–8

  • Tayur S, Ganeshan R, Magazine M (1999) Quantitative models for supply chain management. Kluwer International Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, MA

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Toffler A (1970) Future shock. Bodley Head Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler A (1984) The third wave. Bantam Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson J (2007) Mass customization and build to order practices: an engineering perspective. Cincom Systems Report

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ashok Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, A. From mass customization to mass personalization: a strategic transformation. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 19, 533–547 (2007).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Mass customization
  • Personalization
  • Meta research
  • Modularity
  • Delayed differentiation