Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Feed types affect the growth, nutrient utilization, digestive capabilities, and endocrine functions of Megalobrama amblycephala: a comparative study between pelleted and extruded feed

  • Published:
Fish Physiology and Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, both pelleted feed (PF) and extruded feed (EF) have been widely adopted in the aquaculture industry. However, limited information is available comparing their utilization efficiencies and meanwhile interpreting the underlying mechanisms. This study aimed to compare the utilization efficiencies of both PF and EF by blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) based on growth performance, digestive capacities, and endocrine functions. Two feeds with identical formulas were prepared and named PF and EF. Fish were randomly distributed into two groups, including one that fed the PF continuously, and one that offered the EF continuously. The whole feeding trail lasted 8 weeks. The results showed that the protein efficiency (PER), retention of nitrogen and energy (NRE and ERE), viscera index (VSI), apparent digestibility of dry matter, protein, carbohydrate, and gross energy, whole-body crude protein and energy contents, intestinal enzymatic activities of protease, amylase, and Na+,K+-ATPase, intestinal villi length, crypt depth, muscular layer thickness, and the transcriptions of leptin (LEP) and cholecystokinin (CCK) of the EF group were all significantly higher than those of the PF group, while the opposite was true for feed intake and feed conversion ratio. These findings suggested that compared with PF, EF could improve the feed utilization and nutrient retention of blunt snout bream by enhancing the intestinal digestive and absorptive functions but reduce the feed intake through the stimulation of both LEP and CCK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used to support the study’s conclusions are contained in the publication; further details can be requested from the first author.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA (CARS-45–14), the Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX (21) 0641), and the National Technology System for Jiangsu Agricultural Industry Technology System (JATS (2021) 368).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Xiang-fei Li, Chao-fan He, and Wen-bin Liu conceived and designed the experiment. Lin Zhang, Miao Sun, Ya-ping Ge, Wei-liang Chen, and Guang-zhen Jiang conducted the experiments, analyzed the data, and provided materials and analysis tools. Chao-fan He and Xiang-fei Li organized the paper. The final version of the manuscript was reviewed and approved by all the authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Bin Liu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All animal treatments were authorized by the Animal Care and Use Committee Nanjing Agricultural University (Nanjing, China), ethics number: SYXK (Su) 2011 0036.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors provided consent for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, CF., Li, XF., Jiang, GZ. et al. Feed types affect the growth, nutrient utilization, digestive capabilities, and endocrine functions of Megalobrama amblycephala: a comparative study between pelleted and extruded feed. Fish Physiol Biochem 48, 1025–1038 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-022-01085-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10695-022-01085-1

Keywords

Navigation