Intestinal absorption of amino acids in the Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis): in vitro lysine–arginine interaction using the everted intestine system
The interaction between lysine (Lys) and arginine (Arg) in the proximal intestinal region of Pacific bluefin tuna (Thunnus orientalis) was evaluated using the everted intestine method. This in vitro intestinal system has been shown to be an effective tool for studying the nutrient absorption without the need to handle the tuna fish in marine cages as needed for digestibility and amino acid (AA) absorption. We used a factorial design with two sets of variables: low and high Lys concentration (10 and 75 mM) and four different Arg concentrations (3, 10, 20, and 30 mM). Both amino acids were dissolved in marine Ringer solution with a basal amino acidic composition consisting of a tryptone solution (9 mg mL−1). No interaction was observed between the absorption of Lys and Arg during the first 10 min of the experiment when low concentration of Lys and Arg was used in the hydrolyzate solution. However, there seemed to be a positive effect on Lys absorption when both amino acids were at high concentrations (30 and 75 mM, respectively). This type of studies will led us to test different formulations and/or additives to better understand the efficiency of AA supplementation as an alternative to in situ studies that are difficult to follow to design with the Pacific Bluefin Tuna.
KeywordsAmino acid absorption Bluefin tuna Everted intestine In vitro methods Lysine–arginine Interaction
This work was supported by project numbers SAGARPA/CONACyT 109150; CB-2009-01 and UABC 403/1/C/19/15. We thank Pacífico Aquaculture SA de CV for their kind donation of fish. Emmanuel Martínez-Montaño and Emyr Peña thank CONACyT for their graduate studies fellowships. We thank Nancy Boston for her English editorial work.
- Aguado F, Martínez FJ, García-García B (2004) In vivo total nitrogen and total phosphorus digestibility in Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus thynnus Linnaeus, 1758) under industrially intensive fattening conditions in Southeast Spain Mediterranean coastal waters. Aquac Nutr 10:413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bai SC, Gatlin DM III (1994) Effect of l-lysine supplementation of diet with different protein levels and sources of channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus (Rafinesque). Aquac Fish Manage 25:465–474Google Scholar
- Buddington RK, Chen JW, Diamond JM (1987) Genetic and phenotypic adaptation of intestinal nutrient transport to diet in fish. J Physiol 392:261–281Google Scholar
- Guillaume J, Kaushik S, Bergot P, Métailler R (2001) Nutrition and feeding of fish and crustaceans. Springer Praxis Books, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- Hardy RW, Barrows FT (2002) Diet formulation and manufacture. In: Halver JE, Hardy RW (eds) Fish nutrition, 3rd edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 505–600Google Scholar
- Maenz DD, Chenu C, Breton S, Berteloot A (1992) pH-dependent heterogeneity of acidic amino acid transport in rabbit jejunal brush border membrane vesicles. J Biol Chem 257(3):1510–1516Google Scholar
- National Research Council (2011) Nutritional requirements of fish and shrimps. The National Academic Press, Washington, DC, p 376Google Scholar
- Ottolenghi F (2008) Capture-based aquaculture of bluefin tuna. In: Lovatelli A, Holthus PF (eds) Capture-based aquaculture: global overview. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 508, Rome, pp 169–182Google Scholar
- Palavesam A, Beena S, Immanuel G (2008) Effect of l-lysine supplementation with different protein levels in diets on growth, body composition and protein metabolism in pearl spot Etroplus suratensis (Bloch). Turkish J Fish Aquat Sci 8:133–139Google Scholar
- Tseng Y, Hwang P (2008) Some insights into energy metabolism for osmoregulation in fish. Comp Biochem Physiol C 148:419–429Google Scholar
- Zertuche-González JA, Sosa-Nishizaki O, Vaca-Rodríguez JG, del Moral-Simanek R, Yarish C, Costa-Pierce BA (2008) Marine science assessment of capture-based tuna (Thunnus orientalis) Aquaculture in the Ensenada Region of Northern Baja California, México. Final report to the David & Lucile Packard Foundation, Los Altos, CAGoogle Scholar