Skip to main content

A Closed-Form Solution of the Smoke Filling Time and Descent History in Enclosure Growing Fires with Floor Leaks

Abstract

For the smoke filling time or smoke descent history in enclosure fires with floor leaks, the existing close-formed solutions are all based on the hypothesis that the expansion term is negligible. However, when the smoke interface is near to the floor level, the expansion term is more important than the plume entrainment term and the existing solutions give unrealistic predictions. For those scenarios where the expansion term cannot be neglected, there is not yet a closed-form solution for the smoke filling time or the smoke descent history. Based on asymptotic analysis, a closed-form solution is derived in this work when the smoke fills the room fully, namely, when the smoke interface reaches the floor level. In addition, a closed-form solution is derived for the smoke filling history, which describes when the smoke interface reaches any given height. In the two solutions, both the expansion term and the plume entrainment term are considered. By comparing with the results from the numerical solution for a wide range of scenarios, it is shown that the relative error of the suggested solution for smoke descent history is in the range from − 2.8% to 1.7%. To be conservative, we can reduce 1.7% from the prediction value of the suggested solution, which causes no more than 4.5% underestimation of the smoke filling time for any given height. An illustrative example is presented to demonstrate the calculation procedure and practical usefulness of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Abbreviations

A f :

Floor area covered by the growing fire, m2

c p :

Specific heat of air at constant pressure, kJ/(kg K)

D :

Diameter of the fire source, m

E :

Relative error

g :

Acceleration due to gravity, m/s2

H :

Height of enclosure from floor to ceiling, m

\(\dot{m}_{{\text{e}}}\) :

Expansion term, kg/s

\(\dot{m}_{{\text{p}}}\) :

Plume term, kg/s

p :

Positive number introduced in Equation (29), being set as 1.63 by regression

q :

Positive number introduced in Equation (37), being set as 3.4 by regression

\(\dot{q}^{\prime\prime}\) :

Heat release rate per unit area (HRRPUA) of floor covered by fire, kW/m2

\(\dot{Q}\) :

Heat release rate, kW

r :

Positive number introduced in Equation (35), being set as 0.368 by regression

S :

Enclosure cross-sectional area (supposed to be constant), m2

T a :

Ambient temperature, K

t :

Time, s

t c :

Characteristic time defined in Equation (13), s

X :

Non-dimensional variable defined in Equation (4)

X 0 :

Value of X when the smoke interface reaches the floor level

X 0L :

Asymptotic value of X0 as Λ approaches to 0

X 0s :

Asymptotic value of X0 as Λ approaches to infinity

y :

Non-dimensional smoke-interface height defined in Equation (10)

y s :

Non-dimensional smoke-interface height predicted by the SFPE solution [8, 12]

Y :

Non-dimensional variable defined in Equation (3)

z :

Smoke-interface height, m

α :

Fire growth factor, kW/s2

λ c :

Fraction of heat release rate lost to enclosure boundaries

λ r :

Fraction of heat release rate lost due to radiation from fire plume

Λ :

Non-dimensional variable defined in Equation (5)

ρ a :

Density of ambient air, kg/m3

σ :

Non-dimensional heat release rate at the characteristic time, defined in Equation (12)

τ :

Non-dimensional time defined in Equation (11)

τ 0 :

Value of τ when smoke interface reaches the floor level

τ 0L :

Asymptotic value of τ0 as σ approaches to 0

τ 0s :

Asymptotic value of τ0 as σ approaches to infinity

τ n :

Value of τ calculated by numerical solution

τ p :

Asymptotic limiting solution of τ while the expansion term is neglected

References

  1. Zukoski EE (1978) Development of a stratified ceiling layer in the early stages of a closed-room fire. Fire Mater 2:54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Practical Fire Safety Guidance for Existing Premises with Sleeping Accommodation. Scottish Government. 2018

  3. Cheung SCP, Lo SM, Yeoh GH, Yuen RKK (2006) The influence of gaps of fire-resisting doors on the smoke spread in a building fire. Fire Saf J 41:539–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper LY (1982) A mathematical model for estimating available safe egress time in fires. Fire Mater 6:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper LY (1983) The development of hazardous conditions in enclosures with growing fires. Combust Sci Technol 33:279–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chow WK, Li YZ, Cui E, Huo R (2001) Natural smoke filling in atrium with liquid pool fires up to 1.6 MW. Build Environ 36:121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goo J (2012) Development of the size distribution of smoke particles in a compartment fire. Fire Saf J 47:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mowrer FW (2016) Enclosure smoke filling and fire-generated environmental conditions. SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 5th edn. Springer, New York, pp 1066–1101

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhou Y, Meng Q (2021) Validity of methods for analytically solving the governing equation of smoke filling in enclosures with floor leaks and growing fires. Fire Technol 57:1927–1950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Delichatsios M (2003) Closed-form approximate solutions for smoke filling in enclosures including the volume expansion term. Fire Saf J 38:71–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Delichatsios M (2004) Tenability conditions and filling times for fires in large spaces. Fire Saf J 39:643–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou ZY, Zhou Y (2022) A correction of the SFPE solution for smoke filling in enclosures with floor leaks and growing fires. Fire Technol 58:29–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Karlsson B, Quintiere JG (2022) Enclosure fire dynamics, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Heskestad G (1988) Fire plume air entrainment according to two competing assumptions. Symp (Int) Combust 21:111–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Michael Delichatsios acknowledges the partial support of Leverhulme Emeritus Scholarship EM-2020-033.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yan Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Numerical Solutions of Equations (6) and (8)

Appendix A: Numerical Solutions of Equations (6) and (8)

See Figure 

Figure 5
figure 5

Numerical solutions of Equations (6) and (8) corresponding to different values of the scenario parameter terms, Λ and σ, respectively, where σ is related to Λ by Equation (16)

5.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Y., Delichatsios, M., Deligiannis, M. et al. A Closed-Form Solution of the Smoke Filling Time and Descent History in Enclosure Growing Fires with Floor Leaks. Fire Technol 59, 271–287 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01372-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01372-0

Keywords

  • Enclosure
  • Smoke filling time
  • Floor leak
  • Growing fire
  • Closed-form solution
  • Asymptotic analysis