Skip to main content
Log in

Hybrid Ensemble Based Machine Learning for Smart Building Fire Detection Using Multi Modal Sensor Data

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fire disasters are one the most challenging accidents that can take place in any urban buildings like houses, offices, hospitals, colleges and industries. These accidents which the world faces now, have never been more frequent and fatal, leading to innumerable loses, damage of expensive equipment and unparalleled human lives. The concrete landscapes are threatened by fire disasters, which have prolifically outnumbered in the last decade, both in intensity and frequency. Thus, to minimize the impact of fire disasters, adoption of well planned, intelligent and robust fire detection technology harnessing the niches of machine learning is necessary for early warning and coordinated prevention and response approach. In this research a novel hybrid ensemble technology based machine algorithm using maximum averaging voting classifier has been designed for fire detection in buildings. The proposed model uses feature engineering pre-processing techniques followed by a synergistic integration of four classifiers namely, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), Decision tree and Naive Bayes classifier to yield better prediction and improved robustness. A database from NIST has been chosen to validate the research under different fire scenarios. Results indicate an improved classification accuracy of the proposed ensemble technique as compared to reported literatures. After validating the algorithm, the firmware has been implemented on a laboratory developed prototype of smart multi sensor, embedded fire detection node. The designed smart hardware is successfully able to transmit the sensed data wirelessly onto the cloud platform for further data analytics in real time with high precision and reduced root mean square error (MAE).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bu F, Gharajeh MS (2019) Intelligent and vision-based fire detection systems: a survey. Image Vis Comput 91:103803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu H, Wu D, Zhao J (2019) An intelligent fire detection approach through cameras based on computer vision methods. Process Saf Environ Prot 127:245–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meacham BJ (1994) The use of artificial intelligence techniques for signal discrimination in fire detection systems. J Fire Prot Eng 6:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ko B, Cheong K, Nam J (2009) Fire detection based on vision sensor and support vector machines. Fire Safety J 44:322–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Olivas JA (2003) Forest fire prediction and management using soft computing Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), pp. 338–344

  6. Mahdipour E, Dadkhah C (2010) Automatic fire detection based on soft computing techniques: review from 2000 to Artif. Intell Rev 42(4):895–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anezakis VD, Demertzis K, Iliadis L, Spartalis S (2016) A hybrid soft computing approach producing robust forest fire risk indices. In: IFIP International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications and Innovations, Springer International Publishing, pp. 191–203.

  8. Aertsen W, Kint V, Van J, Orshoven K., Ozkan, Muys B (2009) Performance of modelling techniques for the prediction of forest site index: a case study for pine and cedar in the Taurus mountains. Turkey XIII World Forestry Congress, pp. 18–23

  9. Angelis AD, Ricotta C, Conedera M, Pezzatti GB (2015) Modelling the meteorological forest fire niche in heterogeneous pyrologic conditions. PLoS ONE 10(2):0116875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oliveira S, Oehler F, San-Miguel-Ayanz J, Camia A, Pereira JM (2012) Modeling spatial patterns of fire occurrence in Mediterranean Europe using Multiple Regression and Random Forest Ecol. Manage 275:117–212

    Google Scholar 

  11. West AM, Kumar S, Jarnevich CS (2016) Regional modeling of large wildfires under current and potential future climates in Colorado and Wyoming USA. Clim Change 134(4):565–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bedia J, Herrera S, Camia A, Moreno JM, Gutiérrez JM (2014) Forest fire danger projections in the Mediterranean using ENSEMBLES regional climate change scenarios. Clim Change 122(1–2):185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Amatulli G, Camia A, San-Miguel-Ayanz J (2013) Estimating future burned areas under changing climate in the EU-Mediterranean countries Sci. Total Environ 450:209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Satir O, Berberoglu S, Donmez C (2015) Mapping regional forest fire probability using artificial neural network model in a mediterranean forest ecosystem. Geomatics Nat Hazards Risk. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2015.1084541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Özbayoğlu AM, Bozer R (2012) Estimation of the burned area in forest fires using computational intelligence techniques. Proc Comput Sci 12:282–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yuan C, Zhang Y, Liu Z (2015) A survey on technologies for automatic forest fire monitoring detection and fighting using unmanned aerial vehicles and remote sensing techniques. Can J Forest Res 45(7):783–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Denham M, Cortés AT , Margalef E (2008) Applying a dynamic data driven genetic algorithm to improve forest fire spread prediction International Conference on Computational Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 36–45

  18. Bui DT, Bui QT, Nguyen QP, Pradhan B, Nampak H, Trinh PT (2017) A hybrid artificial intelligence approach using GIS-based neural-fuzzy inference system and particle swarm optimization for forest fire susceptibility modeling at a tropical area. Agric For Meteorol 233:32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Artés T, Cencerrado A, Cortés A, Margalef T (2016) Time aware genetic algorithm for forest fire propagation prediction: exploiting multi-core platforms. Concurrency Computat: Pract Exper. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.3837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hong H, Naghibi SA, Dashtpagerdi MM, Pourghasemi HR, Chen W (2017) A comparative assessment between linear and quadratic discriminant analyses (LDA-QDA) with frequency ratio and weights-of-evidence models for forest fire susceptibility mapping in China. Arab J Geosci 10:167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bisquert M, Caselles E, Sánchez JM, Caselles V (2012) Application of artificial neural networks and logistic regression to the prediction of forest fire danger in Galicia using MODIS data. Int J Wildland Fire 21:1025–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Goldarag YJ, Mohammadzadeh A, Ardakani AS (2016) Fire risk assessment using neural network and logistic regression. J Indian Soc Rem Sens. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-016-0557-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maeda EE, Formaggio AR, Shimabukuro YE, Arcoverde GFB, Hansen MC (2009) Predicting forest fire in the Brazilian Amazon using MODIS imagery and artificial neural networks. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 11:265–272

    Google Scholar 

  24. Safi Y, Bouroumi A (2013) Prediction of forest fires using artificial neural networksAppl. Math Sci 7:271–286

    Google Scholar 

  25. Basheer I, Hajmeer AM (2000) Artificial neural networks: fundamentals computing design and application. J Microbiol Methods 43:3–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sakr GE, Elhajj IH, Mitri G (2011) Efficient forest fire occurrence prediction for developing countries using two weather parametersEng. Appl Artif Intell 24:888–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xie DW, Shi SL (2014) Prediction for burned area of forest fires based on SVM model. Appl Mech Mater 513:4084–4089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ko BC, Cheong KH, Nam JY (2009) Fire detection based on vision sensor and support vector machines. Fire Saf J 44:322–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao J, Zhang Z, Han S, Qu C, Yuan Z, Zhang D (2011) SVM based forest fire detection using static and dynamic features. Computer Sci Inform Syst 8:821–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wen T, Zhang B, University LT (2014) Prediction model for open-pit coal mine slope stability based on random forest. Sci Technol Rev 32:105–109

    Google Scholar 

  31. Haifley T (2002) Linear logistic regression: an introduction. IEEE International Integrated Reliability Workshop Final Report, pp. 184-187 https://doi.org/10.1109/IRWS.2002.1194264

  32. Rao P, Manikandan J (2016) Design and evaluation of logistic regression model for pattern recognition systems. IEEE Annual India Conference (INDICON), pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/INDICON.2016.7839010

  33. Swain PH, Hauska H (1977) The decision tree classifier: design and potential. IEEE Trans Geosci Electron 15:142–147. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGE.1977.6498972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Navada A, Ansari AN, Patil S, Sonkamble BA (2011) Overview of use of decision tree algorithms in machine learning. IEEE Control and System Graduate Research Colloquium, Shah Alam. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSGRC.2011.5991826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao H, Yin S, Ru Z (2012) Relevance vector machine applied to slope stability analysis. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 36:643–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang Y, Jianping L, Yang Y (2015) The research of the fast SVM classifier method. 12th International Computer Conference on Wavelet Active Media Technology and Information Processing (ICCWAMTIP), Chengdu, pp. 121–124. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCWAMTIP.2015.7493959.

  37. Mousa A, Ghasemian B, Shirzadi A, Shahabi H et al (2019) A novel hybrid approach of Bayesian Logistic Regression and its ensembles for landslide susceptibility assessment. Geocarto Int 34:1427–1457. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2018.1499820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chok YH, Jaksa MB, Kaggwa WS, Griffiths DV, Fenton GA (2016) Neural network prediction of the reliability of heterogeneous cohesive slopes. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 40:1556–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ren J, Lee SD, Chen X, Kao B, Cheng R, Cheung D (2009) Naive Bayes Classification of Uncertain Data. Ninth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Miami, FL, pp. 944–949, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2009.90

  40. Dietterich TG (1997) Machine-learning research. AI Mag 18:97

    Google Scholar 

  41. Cho SB, Ryu J (2002) Classifying gene expression data of cancer using classifier ensemble with mutually exclusive features. Proc IEEE 90:1744–1753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Qi C, Tang X (2018) A hybrid ensemble method for improved prediction of slope stability. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 42:1823–1839. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dogan A, Birant D (2019) A Weighted Majority Voting Ensemble Approach for Classification. 4th International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (UBMK), Samsun, Turkey, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/UBMK.2019.8907028

  44. Jiakun Z, Ju J, Si C, Ruifeng Z, Bilin Y, Qingfang L (2020) A weighted hybrid ensemble method for classifying imbalanced data” Knowledge-Based Systems. ISSN 203:106087

    Google Scholar 

  45. He H, Garcia EA (2009) Learning from imbalanced data. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 21:1263–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Oscar C, Przemysław K, Bogdan T (2011) Special issue on hybrid and ensemble methods in machine learning. New Gener Comput. 29:241–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00354-011-0300-3

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang N, Zhao S, Cui S, Fan W (2021) A hybrid ensemble learning method for the identification of gang-related arson cases. Knowl-Based Syst 218:0950–7051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.106875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Gandhi Pandey M (2015) Hybrid Ensemble of classifiers using voting. International Conference on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT), pp. 399-404, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICGCIoT.2015.7380496

  49. Liu H, Gegov A, Cocea M (2015) Hybrid ensemble learning approach for generation of classification rules. International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics (ICMLC) . pp. 377–382

  50. Hsu K (2012) Hybrid ensembles of decision trees and artificial neural networks. IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Cybernetics (CyberneticsCom) 25-29, https://doi.org/10.1109/CyberneticsCom.2012.6381610

  51. Yang S, Chen L, Yan T, Zhao Y, Fan Y (2017) An ensemble classification algorithm for convolutional neural network based on AdaBoost. IEEE/ACIS 16th International Conference on Computer and Information Science (ICIS). pp. 401–406

  52. Lu H, Gao H, Ye M, Wang X (2019) A Hybrid ensemble algorithm combining adaboost and genetic algorithm for cancer classification with gene expression data. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinf 01:1–1

    Google Scholar 

  53. Saqlain M, Jargalsaikhan B, Lee JY (2019) A voting ensemble classifier for wafer map defect patterns identification in semiconductor manufacturing. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 32:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSM.2019.2904306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Vahini Ezhilraman S, Srinivasan S et al (2019) Breast cancer detection using gradient boost ensemble decision tree classifier. Int J Eng Adv Technol 9:2249–8958

    Google Scholar 

  55. Renjie X, Haifeng L, Kangjie L, Lin C, Liu Y (2021) A forest fire detection system based on ensemble learning. Forests 12(2):217. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12020217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sujatha G, Usha Rani K (2020) A Comprehensive Hybrid Ensemble Method with Feature Selection Techniques. Advances in Computational and Bio-Engineering. CBE 2019. Learning and Analytics in Intelligent Systems, vol.15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46939-9_8

  57. Zhao J, Jin J, Chen S, Zhang R, Yu B, Liu Q (2020) A w eighted hybrid ensemble method for classifying imbalanced data, Knowledge-Based Systems, 203. ISSN 106087:0950–7051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2020.106087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wang Y, Pan Z, Zheng J, Qian L, Li M (2019) A Hybrid ensemble method for pulsar candidate classification. Instrum Methods Astrophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-019-3602-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Verma B, Hassan SZ (2011) Hybrid ensemble approach for classification. Appl Intell 34:258–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-009-0194-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Chaudhary A, Kolhe S, Kamal R (2016) A hybrid ensemble for classification in multiclass datasets: an application to oilseed disease dataset. Comput Electron Agric 124:65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.03.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kardani N, Zhou A, Nazem M, Shen SL (2021) Improved prediction of slope stability using a hybrid stacking ensemble method based on finite element analysis and field data. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 13(1):188–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.05.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Rosadi D, Andriyani W (2021) Prediction of forest fire using ensemble method. J Phys: Conf Ser 1918:042043

    Google Scholar 

  63. Xie Y, Peng M (2018) Forest fire forecasting using ensemble learning approaches. Neural Comput Appl 31:4541–4550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Stracher GB et al (2019) Gases generated during the low-temperature oxidation and pyrolysis of coal and the effects on methane-air flammable limits. In: Stracher GB (ed) Coal and peat fires: a global perspective. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 157–171

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  65. Nikunj C et al (2004) Ensemble Data Mining Methods NASA Ames Research Centre, USA

  66. Kohavi R ( 2001) A study of cross‐validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In International Joint Conference on ArtificialIntelligence, pp. 1137‐1143

  67. Jiao Z, Zhang Y, Xin J et al (2019) A deep learning based forest fire detection approach using uav and yolov3. In 2019 1st International Conference on Industrial Artificial Intelligence (IAI), Shenyang, China, 2019, pp. 1–5

  68. Lin Z, Chen F, Li B et al (2019) A contextual and multitemporal active-fire detection algorithm based on FengYun-2G SVISSR data. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 57(11):8840–8852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Jang E, Kang Y, Im J, Lee DW, Yoon J, Kim SK (2019) Detection and monitoring of forest fires using Himawari-8 geostationary satellite data in South Korea. Remote Sensing 11(3):271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Shi F, Qian H, Chen W, Huang M, Wan Z (2020) A fire monitoring and alarm system based on YOLOv3 with OHEM. In: Proceedings of the 2020 39th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), Shenyang, China, 27–29 July 2020, pp. 7322–7327

  71. Kim B, Lee J (2019) A video-based fire detection using deep learning models. Appl Sci 9:2862

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saikat Kumar Shome.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jana, S., Shome, S.K. Hybrid Ensemble Based Machine Learning for Smart Building Fire Detection Using Multi Modal Sensor Data. Fire Technol 59, 473–496 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-022-01347-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-022-01347-7

Keywords

Navigation