Skip to main content
Log in

Obstructions and Early Suppression Fast Response Sprinklers

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Early Suppression Fast Response (ESFR) sprinklers were developed to meet the demands of high challenge storage fires and are commonly used for warehouse fire protection. Obstructions created by ceiling structural members, lighting, or piping, can hinder ESFR sprinkler performance. Unfortunately, ESFR sprinkler obstruction sensitivity was largely unknown. Acknowledging the importance of this issue, in 2014 a multi-year testing program was initiated. The fourth and final phase of the project was completed in September of 2019. In total, 65 Actual Delivered Density tests and nine full-scale fire tests were completed using K240 and K200 (K17 and K14) ESFR sprinklers. The results of the testing showed that the obstruction created by an open web steel truss 0.56 m to 0.91 m (22 in. to 36 in.) in depth, located a minimum of 150 mm (6 in.) horizontally from an ESFR sprinkler, will not significantly decrease sprinkler performance. The obstruction created by a bridging member or other obstruction 38 mm × 38 mm (1.5 in × 1.5 in.) in size or less, located a minimum of 0.30 m (12 in.) directly below an ESFR sprinkler, will not significantly decrease sprinkler performance. This also applies to a bridging member attached to open web steel truss. The obstruction created by a flat or round obstruction less than or equal to 0.30 m (12 in.) in width, located a minimum of 0.15 m (6 in.) horizontally from an ESFR sprinkler, will not significantly decrease sprinkler performance. The findings of this project were used as the basis for revisions to the 2022 edition of NFPA 13.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Drysdale D (2011) An Introduction to fire dynamics. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Kung H (1994) Experimental study of actual delivered density for rack storage fires. Fire Saf Sci 1994

  3. Kung H (2011) SFPE fire protection engineering. quarter 1, 2011

  4. (2019) National Fire Protection Association, NFPA 13, Sections 14.2.11.2, and 14.2.11.3

  5. Kung H (2002) Effect of ceiling obstructions upon the performance of ESFR pendent sprinklers in 12 M high buildings. In: International symposium on safety science and technology

  6. (2019) National Fire Protection Association, NFPA 13 Sections 14.2.11.2 and 14.2.11.3

  7. Croce PA, Hill JP, Xin Y (2005) Investigation of the causative mechanism of sprinkler skipping. J Fire Prot Eng 15:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dundas CP, P.H (2005) The scaling of sprinkler discharge: prediction of droplet size sprinkler optimization No. 10 FMRC Technical Report, Serial No. 18792, RC73-T-40," FMRC, June 1974

  9. (2013) National Fire Protection Association, NFPA 13, Table 17.3.3.1

  10. (2013) Underwriters Laboratories, UL 1767 Early Suppression Fast Sprinklers, Northbrook

  11. Kung H (2005) Actual delivered density fire test apparatus for sprinklers protecting high commodity storage. In: Fire safety science eighth international symposium

  12. Mammoser JKH (2007) The evaluation of early suppression fast response sprinkler performance obstructed by bar joist and bridging members in 40 foot high building. Swiss Re Gaps and Pfizer, Inc.; Underwriters Laboratories, Northbrook

  13. (2016) National Fire Protection Association, Automatic Sprinkler Systems Handbook, National Fire Protection Association, 2016, p. Section 21.1.8 text and commentary

  14. (2013) Underwriters Laboratories, UL 1767A Early Suppression Fast Response Sprinklers K-Factor Greater than 14.0, Northbrook, 2013

  15. FM Global (2013) Approval Standard for ESFR Sprinklers Class Series 2008

  16. Yao C (1988) The development of the ESFR sprinkler system. Fire Saf J 14:66–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work was completed for the Fire Protection Research Foundation (Report FPRF 2020-10). The Property Insurance Research Group (PIRG) was the primary sponsor.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Garner A. Palenske.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Availability of Data and Material

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palenske, G.A., Ornelas, G.N. Obstructions and Early Suppression Fast Response Sprinklers. Fire Technol 59, 3157–3184 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-021-01205-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-021-01205-y

Keywords

Navigation