Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative Study on Thermal Runaway Characteristics of Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery Modules Under Different Overcharge Conditions

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to study the thermal runaway characteristics of the lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery used in energy storage station, here we set up a real energy storage prefabrication cabin environment, where thermal runaway process of the LFP battery module was tested and explored under two different overcharge conditions (direct overcharge to thermal runaway and overcharge to safety vent open-standing–recharge to thermal runaway). In this experiment, surveillance cameras, infrared imagers, temperature detectors, and gas detectors were used to guarantee all-around online observation. The experimental results show that under the conditions of these experiments, stop the overcharging process in time after the first battery safety vent is opened can effectively suppress the further development of thermal runaway, and maintain a safe state within 2 h. It also indicates that the thermal runaway process of LFP battery module changes with heat accumulation which needs reaction time, if the heat accumulation could be stopped in time, the occurrence of thermal runaway accidents would be avoided. This provides effective theoretical guidance for safety warning and fire protection of electrochemical energy storage stations with LFP battery system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gangui Y, Dongyuan L, Junhui L, Gang M (2018) A cost accounting method of the Li-ion battery energy storage system for frequency regulation considering the effect of life degradation. Prot Contr Mod Power Syst 3(3):43–51

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tobishima S (2002) Reaction behavior of LiFePO4 as a cathode material for rechargeable lithium batteries. Solid State Ion 148(3–4):283–289

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bandhauer TM, Garimella S, Fuller TF (2011) A critical review of thermal issues in lithium-ion batteries. J Electrochem Soc 158(3):R1–R25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Q, Mao B, Stoliarov SI, Sun J (2019) A review of lithium ion battery failure mechanisms and fire prevention strategies. Prog Energy Combust Sci 73:95–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Larsson F, Mellander B-E (2014) Abuse by external heating, overcharge and short circuiting of commercial lithium-ion battery cells. J Electrochem Soc 161(10):A1611–A1617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Feng X, Sun J, Ouyang M et al (2015) Characterization of penetration induced thermal runaway propagation process within a large format lithium ion battery module. J Power Source 275:261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang Q, Zhao X, Ye J, Sun Q, Ping P, Sun J (2016) Thermal response of lithium-ion battery during charging and discharging under adiabatic conditions. J Thermal Anal Calorim 124(1):417–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang Q, Sun J, Yao X et al (2005) Thermal stability of LiPF6/EC + DEC electrolyte with charged electrodes for lithium ion batteries. Thermochim Acta 437(1–2):12–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Golubkov AW, Scheikl S, Planteu R et al (2015) Thermal runaway of commercial 18650 Li-ion batteries with LFP and NCA cathodes—impact of state of charge and overcharge. RSC Adv 5(70):57171–57186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang P (2018) Study on the fire hazard and thermal runaway critical conditions of lithium ion batteries. University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ouyang D, Liu J, Chen M et al (2018) An experimental study on the thermal failure propagation in lithium-ion battery pack. J Electrochem Soc 165(10):A2184–A2193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fu Y, Lu S, Li K et al (2015) An experimental study on burning behaviors of 18650 lithium ion batteries using a cone calorimeter. J Power Sources 273:216–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ouyang D, Chen M, Liu J et al (2018) Investigation of a commercial lithium-ion battery under overcharge/over-discharge failure conditions. RSC Adv 8:33414–33424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Niculuţǎ M-C, Veje C (2012) Analysis of the thermal behavior of a LiFePO4 battery cell. J Phys Conf Ser 395(1):2013

    Google Scholar 

  15. Qi C, Zhu Y, Gao F et al (2018) Mathematical model for thermal behavior of lithium ion battery pack under overcharge. Int J Heat Mass Transf 124:552–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Larsson F, Anderson J, Andersson P et al (2016) Thermal modelling of cell-to-cell fire propagation and cascading thermal runaway failure effects for lithium-ion battery cells and modules using fire walls. J Electrochem Soc 163(14):A2854–A2865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Song WQ, Hua SJ, Ning CS et al (2005) Research progress in thermal safety of Li-ion batteries. Battery Bimon 35:240–241

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen Y (2019) Reaction diffusion study on the inhibition of dendritic cells in lithium batteries. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of process engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  19. Junhui L, Fengjie G, Gangui Y, Tianyang Z, Jianlin L (2018) Modeling and SOC estimation of lithium iron phosphate battery considering capacity loss. Prot Contr Mod Power Syst 3(3):61–69

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang Q, Huang P, Ping P et al (2017) Combustion behavior of lithium iron phosphate battery induced by external heat radiation. J Loss Prev Process Ind 49:961–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang Q, Ping P, Zhao X et al (2012) Thermal runaway caused fire and explosion of lithium ion battery. J Power Sources 208:210–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lu L, Han X, Li J et al (2013) A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles. J Power Sources 226:272–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuan QF, Zhao F, Wang W, Zhao Y, Liang Z, Yan D (2015) Overcharge failure investigation of lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim Acta 178:682–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen M, De Zhou C, Wang J et al (2016) Experimental study on the combustion characteristics of primary lithium batteries fire. Fire Technol 52(2):365–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research presented in this paper is supported by State Grid Jiangsu Electric Power Co., LTD. (J2019004) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 51807180).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Jin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, L., Wei, C., Guo, D. et al. Comparative Study on Thermal Runaway Characteristics of Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery Modules Under Different Overcharge Conditions. Fire Technol 56, 1555–1574 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00942-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00942-5

Keywords

Navigation