Skip to main content

Design of an ASTM E119 Fire Environment in a Large Compartment

Fire Technology volume 56, pages 1155–1177 (2020)Cite this article

Abstract

Structural fire protection design in the United States is based on prescriptive fire-resistance ratings of individual load-bearing elements which are derived from standard fire testing, e.g. ASTM E119. In standard fire testing, a custom-built gas furnace is traditionally used to heat a test specimen by following the gas temperature-time curve prescribed in the ASTM E119 standard. The span length of the test specimen seldom exceeds 6 m due to the size limitations of available furnaces. Further, the test specimen does not incorporate realistic structural continuity. This paper presents a basis for designing an ASTM E119 fire environment in a large compartment of about 10 m wide, 7 m deep and 3.8 m high constructed in the National Fire Research Laboratory of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Using the designed fire parameters which include heat release rate curve and opening condition (size and configuration), a full-scale experiment was carried out on December 20, 2018. The measured average upper layer gas temperature curve was consistent with the E119 fire curve. The maximum difference between the measured curve and the E119 fire curve towards the end of the test was about 70\(^\circ \hbox {C}\) (7%). The study indicates that by proper design and control, the time-temperature curve for the standard fire testing may be approximated in a real compartment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17

Notes

  1. Note that the first known publication of the standard fire curve is NFPA Quarterly, Vol. 9 (1916), pp. 253–260.

References

  1. Babrauskas V, Williamson RB (1978) The historical basis of fire resistance testing: part I. Fire Technology, 14:184–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Babrauskas V, Williamson RB (1978) The historical basis of fire resistance testing: part II. Fire Technology, 14:304–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ingberg S (1928) Tests on the severity of building fires. NFPA Q, 22:43–61

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lide DR (2001) A century of excellence in measurements, standards and technology. NIST Special Publication 958, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899

  5. Law M (1971) A relationship between fire grading and building design and contents. Fire Research Notes 877, Fire research Station, UK

  6. Pettersson O, Magnusson SE, Thor J (1976) Fire engineering design of steel structures. Publication No. 50, Swedish Institute of Steel Construction, Stockholm, Sweden

  7. Harmathy TZ, Mehaffey JR (1987) The normalized heat load concept and its use. Fire Safety Journal, 12:75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bisby L, Gales J, Maluk C (2013) A contemporary review of large-scale non-standard structural fire testing. Fire Sci Rev, 2:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Steel Construction Industry Forum (1991) Structural fire engineering: investigation of Broadgate phase 8 fire. Technical Report P113, The Steel Construction Institute, UK

  10. Kirby BR (2000) The behaviour of a multi-story steel framed building subjected to fire attack, experimental data. Technical report, British Steel

  11. Lamont S (2001) The behaviour of multi-storey composite steel framed structures in response to compartment fires. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh

  12. Bailey CG (2001) Membrane action of unrestrained lightly reinforced concrete slabs at large displacements. Engineering Structures, 23:470–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu TCH, Fahad MK, Davies JM (2002) Experimental investigation of behaviour of axially restrained steel beams in fire. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 58:1211–1230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Usmani AS, Rotter JM, Lamont S, Sanad AM, Gillie M (2001) Fundamental principles of structural behaviour under thermal effects. Fire Saf J 36:721–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Promethee Furnace at CERIB. http://www.labo-promethee.eu/cutting-edge-equipment/promethee-furnace/. Accessed 15 Oct 2019

  16. Vulcain fire test facility at CSTB. http://www.cstb.fr/en/test-facilities/fire-testing/. Accessed 15 Oct 2019

  17. Lie TT, Kodor VKR (1996) Fire resistance of steel columns filled with bar-reinforced concrete . J Struct Eng ASCE 122(1), 30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Franssen JM, Schleich JB, Cajot LG, Azpiazu W (1996) A simple model for the fire resistance of axially loaded members: comparison with experimental results . Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 37:175–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Simms WI, O’Connor DJ, Ali F, Randall M (1996) An experimental investigation on the structural performance of steel columns subjected to elevated temperatures. J Appl Fire Sci, 5:269–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Han LH, Zhao XL, Yang YF, Feng JB (2003) Experimental study and calculation of fire resistance of concrete-filled hollow steel columns. J Struct Eng ASCE 129(3), 346–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Feng M, Wang YC, Davies JM (2003) Structural behaviour of cold-formed thin-walled short steel channel columns at elevated temperatures. Part 1: experiments. J Constr Steel Res 41: 543–570

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yu HX, Burgess IW, Plank RJ (2009) Experimental investigation of the behaviour of fin plate connections in fire. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65:723–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Li GQ, Guo SX (2008) Experiment on restrained steel beams subjected to heating and cooling. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 64:268–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vassart O, Bailey CG, Nadjai A, Simms WI, Zhao B, Gernay T, Franssen JM (2012) Large-scale fire test of unprotected cellular beam acting in membrane action. Struct Build, 165:327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hasemi Y, Yokobayashi Y, Wakamatsu T, Ptchelintsev A (2010) Modeling of heating mechanism and thermal response of structural components exposed to localized fires: A new application of diffusion flame modeling to fire safety engineering. NIST internal report 6030, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, Maryland

  26. Choe L, Agarwal A, Varma AH (2016) Steel columns subjected to thermal gradients from fire loading: experimental evaluation. J Struct Eng ASCE, 142, 04016037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. NIST NCSTAR 1A (2008) Federal building and fire safety investigation of the world trade center disaster: final report on the collapse of world trade center building 7. Technical report, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland

  28. Engelhardt M, Meacham B, Kodur V, Kirk A, Park H, van Straalen I, Maljaars J, van Weeren K, de Feijter R, Both K (2013) Observations from the fire and collapse of the Faculty of Architecture Building, Delft University of Technology. In: Structure Congress, pp 1138–1149

  29. Gales J (2013) Unbonded post-tensioned concrete structures in fire. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Edinburgh

  30. Zhang C, Gross JL, McAllister TP, Li GQ (2015) Behavior of unrestrained and restrained bare steel columns subjected to localized fire. J Struct Eng-ASCE, 141(10), 04014239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang C, Gross JL, McAllister T (2013) Lateral torsional buckling of steel w-beams to localized fires. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 88:330–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Agarwal A, Choe L, Varma AH (2014) Fire design of steel columns: effects of thermal gradients. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 93:107–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rackauskaite E, Kotsovinos P, Jeffers A, Rein G (2019) Computational analysis of thermal and structural failure criteria of a multi-storey steel frame exposed to fire. Engineering Structures, 180:524–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jiang J, Zhang C (2018) Simulating the response of a 10-story steel-framed building under spreading multi-compartment fires. Int J High-Rise Build, 7:389–396

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yang J, Bundy M, Gross J, Hamins A, Sadek F, Raghunathan A (2015) International R&D roadmap for fire resistance of structures summary of NIST/CIB workshop. Special Publication (NIST SP) 1188, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

  36. Maluk C (2014) Development and application of a novel test method for studying the fire behaviour of CFRP prestressted concrete structural elements. PhD Thesis, The University of Edinburgh

  37. Mostafaei H (2013) Hybrid fire testing for assessing performance of structures in fire: methodology. Fire Safety Journal, 58:170–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang C, Choe L, Gross J, Ramesh S, Bundy M (2017) Engineering approach for designing a thermal test of real-scale steel beam exposed to localized fire. Fire Technol 53(4), 1535–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bundy M, Hamins A, Gross J, Grosshandler W, Choe L (2016) Structural fire experimental capabilities at the nist national fire research laboratory. Fire Technology, 52:959–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang C, Li W, Sun JH, Gross J, Engelhardt M: China-US workshop on building fire safety: building on a century of fire resistance rating. unpublished

  41. ASTM Workshop on Advancements in Evaluating the Fire Resistance of Structures. https://www.astm.org/SYMPOSIA/filtrexx40.cgi?+-P+MAINCOMM+E05+-P+EVENT_ID+3501+-P+MEETING_ID+125416+sympotherinfo.frm. Accessed 15 Oct 2019. The abstracts for the workshop proceeding will be published

  42. Almand KH, Phan LT, McAllister TP, Starnes MA, Gross JL (2004) NIST-SFPE Workshop for Development of a National R&D Roadmap for Structural Fire Safety Design and Retrofit of Structures: Proceedings. NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR) 7133, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

  43. Almand KH (2012) Structural fire resistance experimental research: priority needs of U.S. industry. Grant/Contract Reports (NISTGCR) 12-958, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

  44. Choe L, Ramesh S, Seif M, Hoehler M, Grosshandler W, Gross J, Bundy M (2018) Fire performance of long-span composite beams with gravity connections. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on structures in fire

  45. ASTM E119-18c (2018) Standard test methods for fire tests of building construction and materials. ASTM International, Standard

  46. BSI (2002) Eurocode 1: Actions on structures—Part 1–2: General rules: actions on structures exposed to fire. British Standard

  47. Zhang C, Usmani A (2015) Heat transfer principles in thermal calculation of structures in fire. Fire Safety Journal, 78:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Hamins A, Maranghides A, McGrattan KB, Ohlemiller T, Anleitner R (2005) Federal building and fire safety investigation of the world trade center disaster: experiments and modeling of multiple workstations burning in a compartment. NIST NCSTAR 1-5E, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland

  49. Results and observations from full-scale fire test at BRE Cardington, 16 Jan 2003. Client Report 215–741, British Steel

  50. Vassart O, Zhao B, Cajot LG, Robert F, Meyer U, Frangi A (2014) Eurocodes: background and applications structural fire design. JRC Scientific and Policy Reports EUR 36698 EN, European Union

  51. Kawagoe K (1958) Fire behaviour in rooms. Report 27, Building Research Institute, Japan

  52. Peacock RD, Reneke PA, Forney GP (September 2017) CFAST: consolidated model of fire growth and smoke transport (version 7). Volume 2: users’ guide. NIST Technical Note 1889v2, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland

  53. McGrattan K, Hostikka S, McDermott R, Floyd J, Weinschenk C, Overholt K (2013) Fire dynamics simulator, user’s guide. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA, and VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland, sixth edition

  54. Zhang C, Li GQ (2013) Modified one zone model for fire resistance design of steel structures. Adv Steel Constr, 9:282–97

    Google Scholar 

  55. ISO 834-11:2014 (2014) Fire resistance tests—elements of building construction—part 11: specific requirements for the assessment of fire protection to structural steel elements. Standard, International Organization for Standardization

  56. Drysdale D (1999) An introduction to fire dynamics, 2nd ed. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wickstrom U (1994) The plate thermometer: a simple instrument for reaching harmonized fire resistance tests. Fire Technology, 30:195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sultan MA (2006) Fire resistance furnace temperature measurements: plate thermometers vs shielded thermocouples. Fire Technology, 42:253–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhang C, Li GQ, Wang RL (2013) Using adiabatic surface temperature for thermal calculation of steel members exposed to localized fires. Int J Steel Struct, 13:547–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. NIST E119 Compartment Experiment validation case. https://github.com/firemodels/fds/tree/master/Validation/NIST_E119_Compartment. Accessed 15 Oct 2019

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the NFRL staff including Ramesh Selvarajah, Brian Story, Laurean DeLauter, Anthony Chakalis, Philip Deardorff, Marco Fernandez and Artur Chernovsky for their significant contributions to design, construction and execution of this test program. Valuable suggestions and review comments from Dr. Anthony Hamins, Dr. Matthew Bundy, Dr. Matthew Hoehler, Mr. Nelson Bryner, and Dr. Hai S. Lew of NIST are acknowledged.

Disclaimer

Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fire Research Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, USA

    Chao Zhang, William Grosshandler, Ana Sauca & Lisa Choe

Authors
  1. Chao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William Grosshandler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ana Sauca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lisa Choe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Zhang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, C., Grosshandler, W., Sauca, A. et al. Design of an ASTM E119 Fire Environment in a Large Compartment. Fire Technol 56, 1155–1177 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00924-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00924-7

Keywords

  • Full-scale experiment
  • ASTM E119 fire
  • Large compartment
  • Test fire
  • Design approach