Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of Initial Distribution Ratio and Illumination on Merging Behaviors During High-Rise Stair Descent Process

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Evacuation in high-rise buildings has attracted a lot of researchers to study human performance during evacuation process especially since the “911” disaster. However, there is little research studying the effect of initial distribution ratios among the different floors and the impact of sub-optimal illumination on merging behaviors between different pedestrian flows. In this paper, some experiments are presented in a real staircase to analyze the human behavior at the merging area. Through extracting movement characteristics from recorded video, the data about human movement performance is obtained and studied. It is found that when inflows from upstairs are opposite to inflows from stairs at the merging area, the geometrical structure seems to be biased in favor of occupants from floors and merging behaviors negatively affect the walking speed of pedestrians from upper floors. Then it is found there are three phases (free movement, extended zipper effect and following movement) during merging process. Furthermore, there is a relationship between the time pedestrians enter mid-landing and overall speed: speeds of pedestrians decrease and stabilize as the arrival time to the merging area grows. The merging behaviors are influenced by illumination and initial distribution ratios: in the experimental conditions, initial occupants from floors are more than that from upstairs, contributing high density at the merging area regardless of illumination. The results help to better understand the overall movement during stair evacuations and provide valuable data to validate and improve evacuation models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Averill JD, Song W (2007) Accounting for emergency response in building evacuation: modeling differential egress capacity solutions. US Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building and Fire Research Laboratory

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Ding N, Chen T, Zhang H, Luh PB (2015) Stair evacuation simulation based on cellular automata model considering social forces. In: Traffic and granular flow’13. Springer, pp 145–153

  3. Choi J-H, Hwang H-S, Hong W-H (2011) Predicting the probability of evacuation congestion occurrence relating to elapsed time and vertical section in a high-rise building. In: Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics. Springer, pp 37–46

  4. Chen J-J, Wang X-G, Fang Z (2016) Collaborative evacuation strategy of ultra-tall towers among stairs and elevators. Proc Eng 135:169–173

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xu X, Song W (2009) Staircase evacuation modeling and its comparison with an egress drill. Build Environ 44:1039–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Proulx G, Fahy RF (2004) Account analysis of WTC survivors. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on human behaviour in fire. Belfast, UK, pp 203–214

  7. Ding N, Chen T, Zhang H (2017) Experimental study of elevator loading and unloading time during evacuation in high-rise buildings. Fire Technol 53:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi JH, Galea ER, Hong WH, Individual stair ascent and descent walk speeds measured in a Korean high-rise building. Fire Technol 50:267–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. The Building Regulations 2000: Approved Document B Fire Safety 2006 Edition, British Standards Institution

  10. Institution BS (2004) Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures: part 1–1: general rules and rules for buildings. British Standards Institution

  11. Boyce KE, Purser DA, Shields TJ (2012) Experimental studies to investigate merging behaviour in a staircase. Fire Mater 36:383–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ronchi E, Nilsson D (2014) Assessment of total evacuation systems for tall buildings. Springer

  13. N. F. P. Association (2011) NFPA 101 life safety code. National Fire Protection Association

  14. Code for Fire Protection Design of Tall Buildings [S], 2005

  15. Ronchi E, Nilsson D (2013) Fire evacuation in high-rise buildings: a review of human behaviour and modelling research. Fire Sci Rev 2:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Takeichi N, Yoshida Y, Sano T, Kimura T, Watanabe H, Ohmiya Y (2005) Characteristics of merging occupants in a staircase. Fire Saf Sci 8:591–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kratchman JA (2007) An investigation on the effects of firefighter counterflow and human behavior in a six-story building evacuation. University of Maryland, College Park

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shiwakoti N, Gong Y, Shi X, Ye Z (2015) Examining influence of merging architectural features on pedestrian crowd movement. Saf Sci 75:15–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reneke PA, Peacock RD, Hoskins BL (2013) Combined stairwell and elevator use during building evacuation. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology

  20. Peacock RD, Hoskins BL, Kuligowski ED (2012) Overall and local movement speeds during fire drill evacuations in buildings up to 31 stories. Saf Sci 50:1655–1664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma J, Song W, Tian W, Lo SM, Liao G (2012) Experimental study on an ultra high-rise building evacuation in China. Saf Sci 50:1665–1674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zeng Y, Song W, Jin S, Ye R, Liu X (2017) Experimental study on walking preference during high-rise stair evacuation under different ground illuminations. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 479:26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sano T, Yajima M, Kadokura H, Sekizawa A (2016) Human behavior in a staircase during a total evacuation drill in a high-rise building. Fire Mater 41:375–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ding Y, Weng F (2016) A comparative study of evacuation strategies for high-rise building via combination of stair and elevator based on computer simulation. Int J Emerg Manag 12:41–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huo F, Song W, Lv W, Liew K (2014) Analyzing pedestrian merging flow on a floor–stair interface using an extended lattice gas model. Simulation 90:501–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Galea ER, Sharp G, Lawrence PJ (2008) Investigating the representation of merging behavior at the floor-stair interface in computer simulations of multi-floor building evacuations. J Fire Prot Eng 18:291–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ding Y, Yang L, Rao P (2013) Investigating the merging behavior at the floor-stair interface of high-rise building based on computer simulations. Proc Eng 62:463–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hakonen H, Siikonen M-L (2014) Simulation models of merging priorities in staircases. In: Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2012. Springer, pp 925–933

  29. Hokugo A, Kubo K, Murozaki Y (1985) An experimental study on confluence of two foot traffic flows in staircase. J Archit Plan Environ Eng 358:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fang Z-M, Song W-G, Li Z-J, Tian W, Lv W, Ma J, Xiao X (2012) Experimental study on evacuation process in a stairwell of a high-rise building. Build Environ 47:316–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Huo F, Song W, Chen L, Liu C, Liew KM (2016) Experimental study on characteristics of pedestrian evacuation on stairs in a high-rise building. Saf Sci 86:165–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Melly M (2010) Experimental studies on the effects of merging and deference behaviour on stair-floor landings

  33. Jeon GY, Kim JY, Hong WH, Augenbroe G (2011) Evacuation performance of individuals in different visibility conditions. Build Environ 46:1094–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nagai R, Nagatani T, Isobe M, Adachi T (2004) Effect of exit configuration on evacuation of a room without visibility. Phys A Stat Mech Appl 343:712–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Guo R-Y, Huang H-J, Wong S (2012) Route choice in pedestrian evacuation under conditions of good and zero visibility: experimental and simulation results. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 46:669–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jeon G-Y, Kim J-Y, Hong W-H, Augenbroe G (2011) Evacuation performance of individuals in different visibility conditions. Build Environ 46:1094–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Proulx G, Tiller D, Kyle B, Works P, Creak J, Jalite P (1999) Assessment of photoluminescent material during office occupant evacuation. Institute for Research in Construction

  38. Cao S, Song W, Lv W, Fang Z (2015) A multi-grid model for pedestrian evacuation in a room without visibility. Phys A: Stat Mech Appl 436:45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Nelson H, Mowrer F (2002) Emergency movement, the SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, ed. DiNenno P., Walton DW National Fire Protection Association

  40. Tajima Y, Nagatani T (2001) Scaling behavior of crowd flow outside a hall. In: Phys A-Stat Mech Appl 292:545–554

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Hall ET (1966) The hidden dimension

  42. von Sivers I, Köster G (2015) Dynamic stride length adaptation according to utility and personal space. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 74:104–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang L, Rao P, Zhu K, Liu S, Zhan X (2012) Observation study of pedestrian flow on staircases with different dimensions under normal and emergency conditions. Safety Sci 50:1173–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Campbell C (2012) Occupant merging behavior during egress from high rise buildings. University of Maryland, College Park

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by Key Research and Development Program (2016YFC0802508), the State Key Laboratory of Fire Science in University of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. HZ2018-KF12), Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20133402110009) and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WK2320000035). In addition, the authors want to thank Luca Crociani and Andrea Gorrini for useful discussions and valuable suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, 230027, People’s Republic of China

    Yiping Zeng, Weiguo Song & Shuchao Cao

  2. Wuhan University of Technology, Number 205, Luoshi Road, Hongshan District, Wuhan, 430070, People’s Republic of China

    Feizhou Huo

  3. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Engineering Structure Safety, Shanghai Research Institute of Building Science, Shanghai, 200032, People’s Republic of China

    Zhiming Fang

  4. Complex Systems and Artifical Intelligence Research Center, University of Milano-Bicocca, Viale Sarca 336-Ed. U14, 20126, Milan, Italy

    Yiping Zeng & Giuseppe Vizzari

Authors
  1. Yiping Zeng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Weiguo Song
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Feizhou Huo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhiming Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shuchao Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Giuseppe Vizzari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiguo Song.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeng, Y., Song, W., Huo, F. et al. Effects of Initial Distribution Ratio and Illumination on Merging Behaviors During High-Rise Stair Descent Process. Fire Technol 54, 1095–1112 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0721-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0721-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation