The Use of Positive Pressure Ventilation Fans During Firefighting Operations in Underground Stations: An Experimental Study

Abstract

Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) fans are widely used by the fire service during firefighting operations in buildings. Fans are positioned to create a flow through the enclosure. This flow can remove the smoke after the fire or affect the direction of the smoke to support firefighting operations. In subway stations, it is less common to use PPV fans. Here, 106 full-scale tests with up to four fans have been performed in a training building that represents a subway station. The fans were used as extraction fans. The generated flow through the subway station has been measured. The critical velocity for a hypothetical tunnel (W × H: 3.17 × 4.15 m) attached to the subway station has been calculated as 2.37 m/s. Reaching the critical velocity has been used as criterion for ‘success’. All combinations with four fans exceed this velocity, supporting the idea that the fans could be used to facilitate a firefighting operation. The location of the fans was varied. Combinations with three fans on the platform and one at the top of the staircase performed better than combinations with two fans on the platform, one on the landing and one at the top of the staircase. There is an optimum value for the distance between the fans on the platform and the first step of the staircase. This value depends on the angle of inclination of the fans. The fans were not capable of creating a flow that exceeded the critical velocity in the station itself (L × W × H: 60 × 7.15 × 4.53 m). However, a velocity of 2.40 m/s corresponds to a flow rate that will limit the backlayering distance in the station to 15 m. This was only achieved by tests with four fans (three on the platform and one at the top of the staircase).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13

Abbreviations

\( c_{p} \) :

Specific heat of air (kJ/kg K)

ɛ :

Reduction in critical velocity due to an obstruction

F :

Flow rate (m3/s)

g :

Gravitational acceleration (m/s2)

H :

Tunnel height

\( \bar{H} \) :

Hydraulic tunnel height

\( L_{b} \) :

Backlayering distance (m)

\( \rho_{0} \) :

Ambient density (kg/m3)

Q :

Heat release rate (kW)

\( Q^{*} \) :

Dimensionless heat release rate

\( T_{0} \) :

Ambient temperature (K)

\( V_{cr} \) :

Critical velocity (m/s)

\( V_{ctr} \) :

Critical velocity in the obstructed tunnel (m/s)

\( V_{cr}^{*} \) :

Dimensionless critical velocity

\( V^{*} \) :

Dimensionless ventilation velocity

References

  1. 1.

    Svensson S (2000) Fire ventilation. Swedish Rescue Services Agency, Karlstad

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ziesler PS, Gunnerson FS, Williams SK (1994) Advances in positive pressure ventilation: live fire tests and laboratory simulation. Fire Technol 30:269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Vaari J, Hietaniemi J (2000) Smoke ventilation in operational fire fighting. Part 2: multi-story buildings. VTT Publications 419, Technical Research Centre of Finland

  4. 4.

    Svensson S (2001) Experimental study of fire ventilation during fire fighting operations. Fire Technol 37:69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Le Corré F (2001) Ventilation dans les incendies appliqué au métro Parisien, ENSAM, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lougheed GD, McBride PJ, Carpenter DW (2002) Positive pressure ventilation for high-rise buildings. National Research Council Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Ezekoye OA, Hal CH, Nicks R (2003) Positive pressure ventilation attack for heat transport in a house fire. In: The 6th ASME-JSME thermal engineering joint conference, 16–20 March

  8. 8.

    Ezekoye OA et al. (2005) Effects of PPV attack on thermal conditions in a compartment downstream of a fire. Fire Technol 41:193–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kerber S, Walton W (2005) Effect of positive pressure ventilation on a room fire, NISTIR 7213. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Ezekoye OA, Svensson S, Nicks R (2007) Investigating positive pressure ventilation. In: Proceedings of 11th international fire science & engineering conference (Interflam’07), Interscience communications, London, 3–5 September

  11. 11.

    Lambert K, Merci B (2014) Experimental study on the use of positive pressure ventilation for fire service interventions in buildings with staircases. Fire Technol 50:1517–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    McCaffrey BJ, Heskestad G (1976) A robust bidirectional low-velocity probe for flame and fire application. Combust Flame 26(1):125–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Leader Group, www.leader-group.eu, Octeville-sur-mer, France

  14. 14.

    Oka Y, Atkinson G (1995) Control of smoke flow in tunnel fires. Fire Saf J 25:305–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wu Y, Bakar M (2000) Control of smoke flow in tunnel fires using longitudinal ventilation systems—a study of the critical velocity. Fire Saf J 35:363–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Fathi T (2010) New perspectives on the critical velocity for smoke control. In: Proceedings: 4th international symposium on tunnel safety and security, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

  17. 17.

    Li Y (2010) Study of critical velocity and backlayering length in longitudinally ventilated tunnel fires. Fire Saf J 45:361–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    NBN S21-208-2 (2010) Fire protection in buildings—design and calculation of smoke and heat extraction installations—part 2: covered car park buildings

  19. 19.

    NFPA 130 (2010) Standard for fixed guideway transit and passenger rail systems

  20. 20.

    Bartlett N (2012) Optimization of smoke control systems in underground subway stations. IMFSE dissertation, Ghent University

  21. 21.

    Lambert K (2014) Positive pressure ventilation in underground systems—an experimental and modelling study. IMFSE dissertation, School of Engineering, The University of Edinburgh

  22. 22.

    Willi J, Madrzykowski D, Weinschenk C (2016) NIST technical note 1938: impact of hose streams on air flows inside a structure

  23. 23.

    Bryant RA (2009) A comparison of gas velocity measurements in a full-scale enclosure fire. Fire Saf J 44:793–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is a summary of the thesis of Karel Lambert [21], performed in the context of the International Master of science in Fire Safety Engineering (IMFSE) at the universities of Ghent, Lund and Edinburgh. The first author strongly acknowledges the financial support from EACEA during his studies in IMFSE, the material support of the Brussels fire department, the Frankfurt Fire Department and Ghent University. The authors also acknowledge Associate Professor Stefan Svensson (Lund University) for their valuable comments during the research. Finally, the authors thank Nathalie Van Moorter for the illustrations in this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Lambert.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lambert, K., Welch, S. & Merci, B. The Use of Positive Pressure Ventilation Fans During Firefighting Operations in Underground Stations: An Experimental Study. Fire Technol 54, 625–647 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0700-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Positive pressure ventilation
  • PPV
  • Fire service intervention
  • Full-scale experiments
  • Subway stations