Skip to main content
Log in

Thermal and Mechanical Computational Study of Load-Bearing Cold-Formed Steel Drywall Systems Exposed to Fire

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The structural fire behavior of typical load-bearing drywall systems, consisting of light cold-formed steel (CFS) studs, sheathed with single or double layers of gypsum plasterboards and air cavity or mineral wool insulation, is investigated. For that purpose, an efficient numerical modeling approach with satisfying accuracy is developed and validated against experimental and numerical results available in the literature. Heat transfer and structural analyses of the investigated drywall assemblies are carried out, employing the computational tools ANSYS CFX and ADINA, respectively. Transient heat transfer analyses provide the spatial and temporal temperature variation over the drywall assembly, which is assumed to be exposed to the standard ISO 834 fire curve from one side. Thermal simulation results are then introduced in the subsequent structural analyses, where the load-bearing capacity of the CFS studs under fire conditions is estimated, by means of Geometry and Material Nonlinear Analyses accounting for Imperfections (GMNIA). The load-bearing capacity assuming uniform cross-sectional temperature distributions is also evaluated and compared to the respective predictions under non-uniform temperature profiles. Results obtained by varying the imposed load or the applied temperature (fire duration), are compared to predictions of existing and literature-proposed fire design guidelines. EN 1993-1-2 provisions lead to average underestimation of the load-bearing capacity by approximately 20%, while the literature-proposed methods are found to underestimate the load-bearing capacity by 5% to 15%. The limitation of using a critical temperature of 350°C for the structural fire design of thin-walled sections is found to be rather conservative, since the investigated CFS studs are able to exhibit satisfying fire performance also under higher temperature conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alfawakhiri F, Sultan MA, MacKinnon DH (1999) Fire resistance of loadbearing steel-stud walls protected with gypsum board: a review. Fire Technol 35:309–335. doi:10.1023/A:1015401029995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen W, Ye J, Bai Y, Zhao XL (2012) Full-scale fire experiments on load-bearing cold-formed steel walls lined with different panels. J Constr Steel Res 79:242–254. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.07.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gunalan S, Kolarkar P, Mahendran M (2013) Experimental study of load bearing cold-formed steel wall systems under fire conditions. Thin-Walled Struct 64:72–92. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2013.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kolarkar P, Mahendran M (2012) Experimental studies of non-load bearing steel wall systems under fire conditions. Thin-Walled Struct 65:72–92. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2013.01.005

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feng M, Wang YC (2005) An experimental study of loaded full-scale cold-formed thin-walled steel structural panels under fire conditions. Fire Saf J 40:43–63. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2004.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kolaitis DI, Founti MA (2013) Development of a solid reaction kinetics gypsum dehydration model appropriate for CFD simulation of gypsum plasterboard wall assemblies exposed to fire. Fire Saf J 58:151–159. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2013.01.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sultan MA, Kodur VR (2000) Light-weight frame wall assemblies: parameters for consideration in fire resistance performance-based design. Fire Technol 36:75–88. doi:10.1023/A:1015446207222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Keerthan P, Mahedran M (2012) Thermal performance of composite panels under fire conditions using numerical studies: plasterboards, rockwool, glass, fibre and cellulose insulations. Fire Technol 49:329–356. doi:10.1007/s10694-012-0269-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gunalan S, Bandula Heva Y, Mahendran M (2014) Flexural–torsional buckling behaviour and design of cold-formed steel compression members at elevated temperatures. Eng Struct 79:149–68. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.07.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ranawaka T, Mahendran M (2009) Distortional buckling tests of cold-formed steel compression members at elevated temperatures. J Constr Steel Res 65(2):249–259. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gunalan S, Bandula Heva Y, Mahendran M (2015) Local buckling studies of cold-formed steel compression members at elevated temperatures. J Constr Steel Res 108:31–45. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.01.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Standards Australia (2005) AS/NZS 4600 Cold-formed steel structures. Sydney

  13. European Committee of Standardization (2002) EN 1993-1-2 Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1–2: General rules-structural fire design, Brussels, Belgium

  14. European Committee of Standardization (2006) EN 1993-1-3 Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1.3: General rules-Supplementary rules for cold-formed members and sheeting, Brussels

  15. European Committee of Standardization (2004) EN 1993-1-5 Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1.5: General rules-Plated structural elements, Brussels

  16. British Standards Institution (1998) British Standard 5950: Structural use of steelwork in buildings, Part 5: Code of practice for design of cold-formed thin gauge sections. London

  17. American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) (2007) Specifications for the cold-formed steel structural members, Cold-formed Steel Design Manual. Washington

  18. Landesmann Α, Camotim D (2015) DSM to predict distortional failures in cold-formed steel columns exposed to fire: Effect of the constitutive law temperature-dependence. Comput Struct 147:47–67. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2014.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shahbazian A, Wang YC (2014) A fire resistance design method for thin-walled steel studs in wall panel constructions exposed to parametric fires. Thin-Walled Struct 77:67–76. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2013.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheng S, Li LY, Kim B (2015) Buckling analysis of partially protected cold-formed steel channel-section columns at elevated temperatures. Fire Saf J 72:7–15. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2015.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dimopoulos CA, Gantes CJ (2012) Comparison of alternative algorithms for buckling analysis of slender steel structures. Struct Eng Mech 44:219–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Feng M, Wang YC (2005) An analysis of the structural behaviour of axially loaded full-scale cold-formed thin-walled steel structural panels tested under fire conditions. Thin-Walled Struct 43:291–332. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2004.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. ANSYS 15.0 (2013) User’s Guide ANSYS Inc. Canonsburg

  24. ADINA System 8.5 (2008) Release Notes ADINA R&D Inc. Watertown

  25. International Standards Organization (1999) ISO 834-1 Fire-resistance tests—elements of building construction—Part 1: General requirements

  26. Cooke GME (1987) Thermal bowing and how it affects the design of fire separating construction. Fire Research Station, Borehamwood

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gantes CJ, Fragkopoulos ΚΑ (2010) Strategy for numerical verification of steel structures at the ultimate limit state. Struct Infrastruct Eng 6(1–2):225–255. doi:10.1080/15732470802664449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gunalan S, Kolarkar PN, Mahendran M (2013) Finite element modelling of load bearing cold-formed steel wall systems under fire conditions. Eng Struct 56:1007–1027. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.06.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gunalan S (2011) Structural behaviour and design of cold-formed steel wall systems under fire conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Australia

  30. Benichou N, Sultan MA, MacCallum C, Hum J (2001) Thermal properties of wood, gypsum and insulation at elevated temperatures. National Research Council, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  31. DiNenno PJ (2002) SFPE Handbook of fire protection engineering, 3rd edn. National Fire Protection Association, MA, USA

  32. International Standards Organization (1996) ISO 6946 Building components and building elements—Thermal resistance and thermal transmittance—Calculation method, Switzerland

  33. Ghazi Wakili K, Hugi E, Wullschleger L, Frank T (2007) Gypsum board in fire-modeling and experimental validation. J. Fire Sci 25:267–282. doi:10.1177/0734904107072883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Asimakopoulou EK, Kolaitis DI, Founti MA (2015) Fire safety aspects of PCM-enhanced gypsum plasterboards: An experimental and numerical investigation. Fire Saf J 72:50–58. doi:10.1016/j.firesaf.2015.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) (2008) Strength of Cold-Formed Steel Jamb stud-to-track connections, Research report RP08-1. Washington DC, USA

  36. Zhao B, Kruppa J, Renaud C, O’Connor M, Mecozzi E, Apiazu W, Demarco T, Karlstrom P, Jumppanen U, Kaitila O, Oksanen T, Salmi P (2005) Calculation rules of lightweight steel sections in fire situations. Technical Steel Research, EU

  37. Kankanamge ND, Mahendran M (2011) Mechanical properties of cold-formed steels at elevated temperatures. Thin-Walled Struct 49:26–44. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2010.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Anderberg Y (1986) Modelling steel behaviour. In: International conference on design of structures against fire. Birmingham, UK

  39. Schafer BW, Peköz T (1998) Computational modelling of cold-formed steel: characterizing geometric imperfections and residual stresses. J Constr Steel Res 47:193–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. ABAQUS user’s manual (2009) Inc. (HKS), USA

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been financially supported by the “Fire-FACTS” project in the frame of the ARISTEIA action (operational programme “Education and Lifelong Learning”) that is co-financed by Greece and the E.U. and by the E.C. in the frame of FP7 Project “ELISSA: Energy Efficient Lightweight-Sustainable-Safe-Steel Construction” (EeB.NMP.2013-1, Grant No. 609086).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dionysios I. Kolaitis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thanasoulas, I.D., Vardakoulias, I.K., Kolaitis, D.I. et al. Thermal and Mechanical Computational Study of Load-Bearing Cold-Formed Steel Drywall Systems Exposed to Fire. Fire Technol 52, 2071–2092 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-016-0604-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-016-0604-4

Keywords

Navigation