Fire Technology

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 353–373 | Cite as

Engineering Variables to Replace the Concept of ‘Noncombustibility’

Article

Abstract

The concept of noncombustibility evolved in the early days of building codes, before quantitative methods of measuring and assessing components of fire hazard were available. ‘Noncombustible’ lacks a technical definition of general scope, but in the US codes, which are the primary focus of this study, it is defined as a material which meets the criteria of the ASTM E136 test. The hazard variables underlying the noncombustibility concept are examined in this study. In view of today’s state of the art, it is shown that noncombustibility requirements, in most cases, constitute a misapplication of fire safety principles and that their use should be discontinued, in preference of using variables that express quantitative fire safety principles. Heat release rate (HRR) is the primary variable which correctly establishes the relevant hazard. In recent years, some regulations have been promulgated which use bench-scale HRR test results directly for this purpose. The ultimate hazard to be addressed, however, is the full-scale HRR behavior. When the hazard involves fires which may spread over surface linings, however, the full-scale HRR is not simply directly scaled to the bench-scale HRR. To quantify this hazard properly, additional properties of the material which govern the flame spread behavior need to be considered. A simple, easy-to-use method for this purpose are described, which is based solely on data obtainable from the Cone Calorimeter (ASTM E1354; ISO 5660) test. Validation of the concept against room-scale data is provided and is shown to be successful.

Keywords

ASTM E136 test Building codes Cone calorimeter Flame spread Heat release rate ISO 9705 test Noncombustibility Surface linings 

List of Symbols

A

ceiling area (m2)

B

nondimensional flame spread parameter (–)

\( \dot{q}^{\prime\prime}_{avg} \)

Cone Calorimeter average HRR, test-average (kW m−2)

\( \dot{q}^{\prime\prime}_{bs} \)

Cone Calorimeter average HRR, 60-s (kW m−2)

T

flashover time (s)

tb

burnout time (s)

tig

ignition time (s)

vfo

flashover speed (m s−1)

Notes

Acknowledgments

The contributions of Marc L. Janssens to this study are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Claret AM, Andrade AT (2007) Fire load survey of historic buildings: a case study. J Fire Prot Eng 17:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Narayanan P (1995) Fire severities for structural fire engineering design (Study Report No. 67), BRANZ, PoriruaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bird EL, Docking SJ (1949) Fire in buildings. Adam & Charles Black, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Babrauskas V (1976) Fire endurance in buildings (Ph.D. dissertation). University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Building Code Recommended by the National Board of Fire Underwriters. James Kempster Printing Co., New York (1905)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The National Building Code (1976) Recommended by the American Insurance Association. American Insurance Association, Engineering and Safety Service, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Building Code Recommended by the National Board of Fire Underwriters, New York (1915) An ordinance providing for fire limits, and regulations governing the construction, alteration, equipment, repair or removal of buildings or structures. National Board of Fire Underwriters, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lyons PR (1976) Fire in America, NFPA, BostonGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Powers WR (1970) One New York Plaza Fire, New York, August 5, 1970, The New York Board of Fire Underwriters, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sachs EO (1898) The Paris Charity Bazaar Fire (Publications of The British Fire Prevention Committee, No. 3), The British Fire Prevention Committee, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Standard test method for surface burning characteristics of building materials (ASTM E84). ASTM, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Steiner AJ (1943) Method of fire–hazard classification of building materials. ASTM Bull 19–22Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Steiner AJ (1944) Fire hazard classification of building materials (Bull. of Research No. 32), Underwriters’ Laboratories, Inc., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cocoanut Grove Night Club Fire, Boston, November 28, 1942, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy (1943)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Steiner AJ (1964) Historical background of the Fire Protection Department, Underwriters’ Laboratories, Inc., pp 15–40. In: Brandon M, eds., The Departments of Underwriters’ Laboratories, Inc., Underwriters’ Laboratories, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Babrauskas V (2003) Ignition handbook. Fire Science Publishers/Society of Fire Protection Engineers, IssaquahGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fire resistance, incombustibility, and noninflammability of building materials and structures (BS 476). British Standards Institution, London (1932)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Setchin NP, Ingberg SH (1945) Test criterion for an incombustible material, Proc ASTM 45:866–877Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shorter GW, Sumi K (1952) ASTM combustibility tests (Research Report 6). Division of Building, Research, National Research Council Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sumi K (1955) Comparison of combustibility test procedures (DBR Report No. 43), Division of Building, Research, National Research Council Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Setchkin NP (1952) Combustibility tests of 47 ASTM material samples (NBS 1454), U. S. National Bureau Standards, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    ASTM (1957) Proposed method of test for defining noncombustibility of building materials. ASTM Bull 33–34Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Noncombustibility of elementary materials (ASTM E136-65), ASTM, Philadelphia (1965). In the 1979 edition, this standard was renamed as: behavior of materials in a vertical tube furnace at 750°C.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fire tests—building materials—non-combustibility test (ISO 1182), ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Herpol GA (1972) Noncombustibility—its definition, measurement, and applications. In: Ignition, heat release, and noncombustibility of materials (ASTM STP 502), pp 99–111. ASTM, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gross D, Lindauer RA, Willard R (1973) Evaluation of two test methods for noncombustibility: ASTM E136 and ISO R1182 (Report of Test No. FR 3846), U. S. National Bureau Standards, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Standard test method for behavior of materials in a vertical tube furnace at 750°C (ASTM E136-2012). ASTM Intarnational, West Conshohocken (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    International Building Code. International Code Council, Inc., Country Club Hills (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Uniform Building Code, 1970 edition, International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier CA (1970).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hall JR, Jr. (2011) Fatal effects of fire, NFPA, QuincyGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Christian WJ (1974) The effect of structural characteristics on dwelling fire fatalities. Fire J 68(1)22Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vogel BM (1977) A study of fire spread in multi-family residences: the causes, the remedies. Build Stand 46(2)56–59, 80Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vogel BM (1977) A study of fire spread in multi-family residences: the causes—the remedies (NBSIR 76–1194), U.S. National Bureau Standards, GaithersburgCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Chamberlain D, King E (1987) Heat release rates of construction assemblies by the substitution method (Technical Report No. 9). American Forest & Paper Associationn, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tran H, White R (1990) Heat release rate from wood wall assemblies using oxygen consumption method. In: Fire and polymers: hazards identification and prevention (ACS symposium series 425). American Chemical Society, Washington, pp 411–428Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thompson NJ, Cousins EW (1959) The FM construction materials calorimeter, NFPA Q 52:186–192Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Babrauskas V, Grayson SJ (1992) Heat release in fires. E&FN Spon, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sharry JL, Walker E (1974) Military personnel records center fire, Overland, Missouri. Fire J 68:3:5–9, 65–70Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ingberg SH (1928) Tests of the severity of building fires. Q NFPA 22(3)43–61Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    International Standard—fire tests—full scale room test for surface products. ISO 970. ISO, Geneva (1993)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Standard test method for room fire test of wall and ceiling materials and assemblies (ASTM E2257). ASTM Interantional, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Standard methods of fire tests for evaluating contribution of wall and ceiling interior finish to room fire growth (NFPA 286), National Fire Protection Assocaiation, QuincyGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Standard test method for evaluating room fire growth contribution of textile wall covering (UBC Standard 8-2), Uniform Building Code, Vol. 3, International conference of Building Officials, Whittier (1997)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    International Standard—fire tests—reaction to fire—part 1: rate of heat release from building products (Cone Calorimeter method). ISO 5660-1:2015(E). ISO, Geneva (2015)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Standard test method for heat and visible smoke release rates for materials and products using an oxygen consumption calorimeter (E1354). ASTM International, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hakkarainen T, Hayashi Y (2001) Comparison of Japanese and European Fire Classification Systems for Surface Linings. Fire Sci Technol (Jpn) 21(1)19–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fire Tests—Reduced-scale model box test (ISO TS 17431), ISO, Geneva (2006)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hermesky M, Murrell J (2009) Cone calorimeter—a cautionary tale. J ASTM Intl. 6:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Babrauskas V, Peacock RD (1992) Heat release rate: the single most important variable in fire hazard. Fire Saf J 18:255–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Standard test method for the determination of combustibility parameters of building materials using an oxygen consumption calorimeter (cone calorimeter), CAN/ULC-S135-04, Underwriters’ Laboratories of Canada, Toronto (2004)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Richardson L. R, Brooks ME (1991) Combustibility of building materials. Fire Saf J 15:131–136Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Richardson LR (1994) Determining degrees of combustibility of building materials: National Building Code of Canada. Fire Mater 18:99–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Carpenter K, Janssens M (2005) Using heat release rate to assess combustibility of building products in the cone calorimeter. Fire Technol 41:79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    National Building Code of Canada (2010) Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes. National Research Council Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Dowling VP, Blackmore JM (1998) Fire performance of wall and ceiling linings (Final Report Project 2, Stage A). Fire Code Reform Centre, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    NCC 2015—National Building Code of Australia (2015) Australian Building Codes Board, Canberra, ACTGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wade C (1995) Fire performance of external wall claddings under a performance-based building code. Fire Mater 19:127–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Cowles GS, Soja E (1999) Flame spread classification method for exterior wall claddings. In: Interflam’99. Interscience Communications Ltd., London, pp 1021–1031Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Approved Document for New Zealand Building Code (2006) Fire safety. Clauses C1, C2, C3, C4. Building Industry Authority/Standards New Zealand, Wellington (2001). Reissued as: Compliance Document for New Zealand Building Code. Clauses C1, C2, C3, C4. Fire Safety. Dept. of Building and Housing, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Alpert RL, Khan MM (2003) A new test method for rating materials as noncombustible. In: Fire safety science—proceedings of 7th international symposium, International Association for Fire Safety Science, pp 791–802Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ahonen A, Weckman H, Yli-Penttilä M (1985) Application of oxygen-consumption calorimetry to non-combustibility testing. Fire Mater 9:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Babrauskas V (1984) Bench-scale methods for prediction of full-scale fire behavior of furnishings and wall linings (SFPE Technical Report 84-10). Society of Fire Protection Engineers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Drysdale DD (2011) An introduction to fire dynamics, 3rd edn. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Baroudi D, Kokkala M (1992) Analysis of upward flame spread, Project 5 of the EUREFIC Fire Research Programme (VTT Publications 89). VTT, Technical Research Centre of Finland, EspooGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Cleary TG, Quintiere JG (1991) Framework for utilizing fire property tests. In: Proceedings of 3rd international symposiums on fire safety science, International Association for Fire Safety Science, pp 647–656. Elsevier Applied Science, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sundström B (1986) Full scale fire testing of surface materials (SP-RAPP 1986:45), BoråsGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Söderbom J (1991) EUREFIC—large scale tests according to ISO DIS 9705. Project 4 of the EUREFIC Fire Research Programme (SP Report 1991:27), BoråsGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Thureson P (1996) fire tests of linings according to room/corner test, ISO 9705 (Client report 95R22049), BoråsGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tsantaridis L, Östman B (1989) Smoke, gas and heat release data for building products in the cone calorimeter (Rapport I 8903013), Trätek, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Thureson P (1991) EUREFIC—cone calorimeter test results. Project 4 of the EUREFIC Fire Research Programme (SP Report 1991:24), BoråsGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Dillon SE, Kim WH, Quintiere JG (1998) Determination of properties and the prediction of the energy release rate of materials in the ISO 9705 room-corner test. Appendices. (NIST-GCR-98-754), Nat. Inst. Stand. & Technol., GaithersburgGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Tsantaridis L, Östman B (1999) Cone calorimeter data and comparisons for the SBI RR products (Report I 9812090), TrätekGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Babrauskas V, White JA. Jr., Urbas J (1997) Testing for surface spread of flame: new tests to come into use. Build Stand 66(2):13–18Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Babrauskas V, Lucas D, Eisenberg D, Singla V, Dedeo M, Blum A (2012) Flame retardants in building insulation: a case for re-evaluating building codes. Build Res Inf 40:738–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Standard Methods of Fire Tests for Flame Propagation of Textiles and Films (NFPA 701), National Fire Protection Association, QuincyGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Babrauskas V, Gray BF, Janssens ML (2007) Prudent practices for the design and installation of heat-producing devices near wood materials. Fire Mater 31:125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Babrauskas V (2016) Explosions of ammonium nitrate fertilizer in storage or transportation are preventable accidents. J Hazard Mater 304:134–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Torsuev NS (1936) Explosive fertilizer containing ammonium nitrate. J Chem Indus [Russian] 13:102–104Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Babrauskas V (2016) UN Test O.1 errors in quantifying the behavior of solid oxidizers. J Loss Prevent Process Indus 39:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Su JZ, Lougheed GD (2014) Report to research consortium for wood and wood-hybrid mid-rise buildings (Report A1-004377.1), National Research Council of CanadaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fire Science and Technology Inc.San DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations