Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perimeter Column Boundary Conditions in Structural Fire Modelling

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the impact of perimeter column boundary conditions in the modelling of multi-storey structures when subject to fire. An idealised model of a building section is created with a range of column boundary conditions; the sensitivity of results are then analysed. It is found that considering only a limited number of floors results in an overestimation of the moment in the perimeter column by up to 50% under standard heating, but has relatively little impact on beam displacements—less than 5% after standard heating. It is found that the proximity of the boundary conditions has less impact on the results as column stiffness reduces, or if moment connections are provided. A range of possible simplified boundary conditions are considered and it is concluded that the cruder restrained simplifications are likely to lead to an overestimation of column moment sometimes in excess of 50%, but have relatively little impact on floor deflection. Of the idealised boundary conditions analysed, it was found that representing 3 floors and 4 heights of column gives the most significant improvement in accuracy in comparison to a single storey model. Models with pinned boundary conditions ±1-floor (relative to the fire floor) and fixed boundary conditions at ±1.5 or ±2-floors (relative to the fire floor) gave a more accurate result than simply fixing at ±1-floor. It was found that when connections between the beam and the column are pinned, the model with boundary conditions pinned at ±1-floor and fixed at ±2-floors gives a more accurate result than the model with fixed conditions at ±1.5-floors. The results of the study are presented to allow modellers to make an informed judgement about the level of complexity with which to represent a structure above and below the fire-heated floor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McAllister TP, Gross JL, Sadek F, Krikpatrick S, MacNeill RA, Zarghamee M, Erbay OO, Sarawit AT (2013) Structural response of World Trade Center buildings 1, 2 and 7 to impact and fire damage. Fire Technol 49(3):709–739. doi:10.1007/s10694-012-0289-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Usmani A, Röben C, Al-Remal A (2009) A very simple method for assessing tall building safety in major fires. Int J Steel Struct 9(1):17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lange D, Röben C, Usmani A (2012) Tall building collapse mechanisms initiated by fire: mechanisms and design methodology. Eng Struct 36:90–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang YC, Lennon T, Moore DB (1995) The behaviour of steel frames subject to fire. J Constr Steel Res 35(3):291–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang YC (1997) The effects of frame continuity on the behaviour of steel columns under fire conditions and fire resistant design proposals. J Constr Steel Res 41(1):93–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bailey CG, Burgess IW, Plank RJ (1996) Computer simulation of a full-scale structural fire test. Struct Eng 74(6):93–100

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bailey CG, Moore DB, Lennon T(1999) The structural behaviour of steel columns during a compartment fire in a multi-storey braced steel-frame. J Constr Steel Res 52(2):137–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Elghazouli AY, Izzuddin BA (2001) Analytical assessment of the structural performance of composite floors subject to compartment fires. Fire Saf J 36(8):769–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gillie M (2000) The behaviour of steel-framed composite structures in fire. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  10. Foster S, Chladná M, Hsieh C, Burgess I, Plank R (2007) Thermal and structural behaviour of a full-scale composite building subject to a severe compartment fire. Fire Saf J 42(3):183–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lamont S, Usmani AS, Gillie M (2004) Behaviour of a small composite steel frame structure in a ‘Long-Cool’ and a ‘Short-Hot’ fire. Fire Saf J 39:327–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lamont S, Lane B, Flint G, Usmani A (2006) Behavior of structures in fire and real design—a case study. J Fire Prot Eng 16(1):5–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. G. Flint (2005) Fire induced collapse of tall buildings. The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bailey CG, Burgess IW, Plank RJ (1996) Analyses of the effects of cooling and fire spread on steel-framed buildings. Fire Saf J 26:273–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Röben C, Gillie M, Torero J, Roben C (2010) Structural behaviour during a vertically travelling fire. J Constr Steel Res 66(2):191–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Heise A, Flint G, Lane B (2007) Effect of fire on tall buildings: case study. In: Proceedings of 3rd international conference on steel and composite structures

  17. Block FM, Yu C, Butterworth NA (2010) The practical application of structural fire engineering on a retail development in the UK. J Struct Fire Eng 1(4):205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jowsey A, Lim L, Lane B (2009) Structural fire analysis for perimeter braced framed structure. Applications of Structural Fire Engineering, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kotsovinos P, Law A, Deeny S, Butterworth NA (2014) Structural fire response of tall buidlings with inclined and bi-linear perimeter columns. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on structures in fire, pp 1031–1038

  20. Garlock MM, Quiel SE (2007) The behavior of steel perimeter columns in a high-rise building under fire. AISC Eng J 44(4):359–372

    Google Scholar 

  21. Quiel SE, Garlock MEMM (2008) A closed-form analysis of perimeter member behaviour in a steel building frame subject to fire. Eng Struct 30(11):3276–3284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. COST TU0904 (2012) Integrated fire engineering and response: case studies. In: F Wald, I Burgess, G Rein, L Kwasniewski, P Vila Real, K Horova (eds) CTU Publishing Production, Czech Technical University, Prague

  23. Wang YC, Lennon T, Moore DB (1995) The behaviour of steel frames subject to fire. J. Constr. Steel Res 35(3):291–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. EN1993-1-1 (2010) Eurocode 3: design of steel structures—Part 1-1: general rules and rules for buildings

  25. EN1994-1-1 (2008) Eurocode 4: design of composite steel and structures—Part 1-1: general—structural fire design

  26. EN1990 (2004) Eurocode 0: basis of structural design

  27. EN1991-1-1 (2009) Eurocode 1: actions on structures—Part 1-1: general actions—densities, self-weight and imposed loads

  28. EN1993-1-2 (2005) Eurocode 3: design of steel structures—Part 1-2: general rules—structural fire design

  29. FIB Model Code for Concrete Structures (2013) Special Activity Group 5: New Model Code, Ernst & Sohn, Berlin

  30. Huang Z, Burgess IW, Plank RJ (1999) The influence of shear connectors on the behaviour of composite steel-framed buildings in fire. J Constr Steel Res 51(3):219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. LS-DYNA (2012) Keyword user’s manual, vol I (version 971 R6.1.0). Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gillie M (2009) Analysis of heated structures: nature and modelling benchmarks. Fire Saf J 44(5):673–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. ISO 834-1 (1999) Fire-resistance tests—elements of building construction—Part 1 general requirements. International Organization for Standardization, London

    Google Scholar 

  34. Flint G, Lamont S, Lane B, Sarrazin H, Lim L, Rini D, Roben C (2013) Recent lessons learned in structural fire engineering for composite steel structures. Fire Technol 49(3):767–792. doi:10.1007/s10694-012-0291-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Angus Law

Authors
  1. Angus Law
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angus Law.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Law, A. Perimeter Column Boundary Conditions in Structural Fire Modelling. Fire Technol 52, 1845–1861 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-015-0530-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-015-0530-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation