Skip to main content
Log in

The Reduced Cross Section Method Applied to Glulam Timber Exposed to Non-standard Fire Curves

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Timber is an desired material for structural applications due to its green credentials and attractive external appearance. Fire safety design of timber structures is largely limited to considering the exposure of elements to the standard fire, to which timber demonstrates exceptional resilience. This paper reports on a series of tests which were carried out with the intention of exploring the impact of non-standard fires on timber elements. Because of the natural variation in timber elements, the tests and the resulting analysis of the test results were conceived and designed in such a way that as much information about the statistical distribution of the response of the elements as possible could be obtained. The resulting testing programme comprised four furnace fire tests, each of eight loaded timber beams, with three different temperature time curves: two standard fire tests, one long-cool parametric fire and one short-hot parametric fire. The reduced cross section method for structural calculations is extended in this paper to parametric fire exposures, and the results of the tests are compared with this method. It is shown that the thickness of the zero-strength layer is dependent on the temperature time curve to which the timber is exposed in the furnace and that the 7 mm zero-strength layer prescribed in EN 1995-1-2 may be un-conservative for members in bending. For the cases studied, the zero-strength layer thickness in bending is shown to be around about 15 mm under standard fire exposure and 16 mm under exposure to a long cool parametric fire. Conversely, the zero-strength layer is only 8 mm deep under exposure to a short hot parametric fire. This has implications for the design of timber elements not only for parametric fire exposure in enclosures, but also perhaps for the use of timber elements in large open structures such as halls or arenas where more localised fire exposure or travelling fire exposure may be expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Odeen K (1970) Standard fire endurance tests—discussion, criticism, and alternatives. In: Symposium on fire test performance, vol 464. ASTM Special Technical Publication, Denver, CO, pp 30–56.

  2. Harmathy TZ, Lie TT (1970) Fire test standard in the light of fire research. In: Symposium on fire test performance, vol 464. ASTM Special Technical Publication, Denver, CO, pp 85–97.

  3. Cameron N (2003) The behaviour and design of composite floor systems in fire. The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  4. EN 1991-1-2 (2002) Eurocode 1: actions on structures—part 1-2: actions on structures exposed to fire. CEN, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

  5. König J (2006) Effective thermal actions and thermal properties of timber members in natural fires. Fire Mater 30(1):51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu L, Isgor OB, Hadjisophocleous G (2010) A computer model for light-frame wood floor assemblies under fire attack. In: 11th World Conference on Timber Engineering, 2010.

  7. Hopkin D, Lennon T, El-Rimawi J, Silberschmidt V (2010) Failure mechanisms of structural insulated panel (SIP) systems under natural fire conditions. In 6th International Conference Structures in Fire (SiF’10), 2010.

  8. Frangi A, Bochicchio G, Ceccotti A, Lauriola MP (2008) Natural full-scale fire test on a 3 storey XLam timber building. In: Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE), 2008.

  9. Lennon T, Hopkin D, El-Rimawi J, Silberschmidt V (2010) Large scale natural fire tests on protected engineered timber floor systems. Fire Saf J 45(3): 168–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Friquin KL (2011) Material properties and external factors influencing the charring rate of solid wood and glue-laminated timber. Fire Mater 35: 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. EN 1995-1-2 (2004) Eurocode 5: design of timber structures—part 1-2: general—structural fire design. CEN, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

  12. Schaffer EL (1984) Structural fire design: wood, Research Paper, FPL 450, United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Products Laboratory.

  13. König J (2004) Notional versus one-dimensional charring rates of timber. In: World Conference on Timber Engineering, 2004, pp 483–486.

  14. Pettersson O, Ödeen K (1978) Brandteknisk dimensionering Principer, underlag, exempel. LiberFörlag, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Magnusson SE, Thelandersson S (1970) Temperature-time curves of complete process of fire development. Lund Institute of Technology, Lund.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schaffer EL, Marx CM, Bender DA, Woeste FE FPL 467 strength validation and fire endurance of glued-laminated timber beams.

  17. Bender DA, Woeste FE, Schaffer EL, Marx CM (1985) FPL 460 reliability formulation for the strength and fire endurance of beams.

  18. Schmid J, König J, Just A (2012) The reduced cross-section method for the design of timber structures exposed to fire—background, limitations and new developments. Struct Eng Int 22(4): 514–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmid J, Klippel M, Just A, Frange A (2014) Review and analysis of fire resistance tests of timber members in bending, tension and compression with respect to the reduced cross-section method. Fire Saf J 68:81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmid J, König J, Köhler J (2010) Fire-exposed cross-laminated timber—modelling and tests. In: World Conference on Timber Engineering, 2010.

  21. Schmid J, Just A, Klippel M, Fragiacomo M (2014) The reduced cross-section method for the evaluation of the fire resistance of timber members: discussion and determination of the zero-strength layer. Fire Technol. doi:10.1007/s10694-014-0421-6.

  22. Klippel M, Schmid J, Frangi A (2012) The reduced cross-section method for timber members subjected to compression, tension and bending in fire. In: International council for research and innovation in building construction, working commission W18—timber structures, 2012.

  23. EN 384 (2010) Structural timber—determination of characteristic values of. CEN, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

  24. EN 1363-1 (2012) Fire resistance tests—part 1: general requirements, no. 122457. CEN, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

  25. ISO 834-1 (1999) Fire-resistance tests—elements of building construction—part 1: general requirements. CEN, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.

  26. Frangi A, Fontana M (2003) Charring rates and temperature profiles of wood sections. Fire Mater 27:91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Swedish Fire Research Board (Brandforsk) for their financial support of this project, as well as to the Svensk Limträ (Swedish glulam) association for supplying the test specimens.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Lange.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lange, D., Boström, L., Schmid, J. et al. The Reduced Cross Section Method Applied to Glulam Timber Exposed to Non-standard Fire Curves. Fire Technol 51, 1311–1340 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-015-0485-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-015-0485-y

Keywords

Navigation