Advertisement

Fire Technology

, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 1535–1543 | Cite as

Travelling Fires and the St. Lawrence Burns Project

  • John Gales
Article

Abstract

This paper represents a timely communication that critically evaluates an example of previously inaccessible and aged grey literature that can now be found in the National Research Council of Canada’s open access online repository. This grey literature, in the form of a series of reports detailing two large scale compartment fire tests from 1958, is critically evaluated. While potential credence to the contemporary research theme of travelling fires framework and methodology is given herein, this evaluation supports further and continued investigation into large compartment fire behaviour to help progress the development and the improvement of fire methodologies for the design of buildings. A case is made that aged grey literature, particularly when previously inaccessible, merits second consideration as information can be of contemporary use for fire science researchers and practitioners.

Keywords

Travelling fires Building fire safety Open access Grey literature Design fire 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to acknowledge the financial support of Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the technical conversations with Agustin H Majdalani, Luke Bisby and Audrey Roy-Poirier.

References

  1. 1.
    Henderson I (2013) Open-access and institutional repositories in fire literature. Fire Technology 49:151–161. doi: 10.1007/s10694-010-0198-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shorter GW, McGuire JH, Hutcheon NB, Legget RF (1960) The St. Lawrence Burns. NFPA Q 53:300–316.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hunt SP, Cutonilli J (2010) Evaluation of enclosure temperature empirical models. Society of Fire Protection Engineers Technical Report. p 70.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shorter GW (1961) The St. Lawrence Burns. In: International symposium on the use of models in fire research, pp 289–295.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shorter GW (1959) The St. Lawrence Burns General Report. National Research Council Canada, Research Report, DBR-IR-150. doi: 10.4224/20337893.
  6. 6.
    Shorter GW, McGuire JH (1959) The St. Lawrence Burns Summary Report. National Research Council Canada, Research Report, DBR-IR-158. doi: 10.4224/20338053.
  7. 7.
    Williams-Leir G (1959) St. Lawrence Burns Temperature Measurements. National Research Council Canada, Research Report, DBR-IR-152. doi: 10.4224/20386650.
  8. 8.
    MacGuire JH (1959) St. Lawrence Burns Resistance Thermometer Measurements National Research Council Canada, Research Report, DBR-IR-155. doi: 10.4224/20338117.
  9. 9.
    Bisby L, Gales J, Maluk C (2013) A contemporary review of large-scale non-standard structural fire testing. Fire Sci Rev 2(1):27. doi: 10.1186/2193-0414-2-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stern-Gottfried J, Rein G (2012) Travelling fires for structural design—Part I: literature review. Fire Saf J 54:74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stern-Gottfried J, and Rein G (2012) Travelling fires for structural design—Part II: design methodology. Fire Saf J 54:96–112. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.06.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    CEN (2002) BS EN 1991-1-2:2002—Eurocode 1: actions on structures—part 1–2: general actions—actions on structures exposed to fire. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, p 62.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    CEN (2004) BS EN 1992-1-2:2004—Eurocode 2: design of concrete structures—part 1.2: general rules—structural fire design. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, p 100.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Post N (2013) 9/11 Blazes Debunk code assumptions about fire behaviour in open-plan offices, Engineering News Record. Issue: July 29/Aug 5, 2013. http://enr.construction.com/buildings/design/2013/0729-911-blazes-debunk-code-assumptions-about-fire-behavior-in-open-plan-offices.asp.
  15. 15.
    Stern-Gottfried J, Rein G, Bisby L, Torero JL. (2010) Experimental review of the homogeneous temperature assumption in post-flashover compartment fires. Fire Saf J 45:249–261. doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2010.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kirby B, Wainman D, Tomlinson L, Kay T, Peacock B (1994) Natural fires in large scale compartments, British Steel, p 92.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lennon T (2003) The natural fire safety concept—full scale tests at Cardington. Fire Saf J 38:623–643. doi: 10.1016/S0379-7112(03)00028-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pitts W, Butler K, Junker V (2005) Federal building and fire safety investigation of the world trade center disaster: visual evidence, damage estimates, and timeline analysis, NIST NCSTAR 1–5a.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    McAllister P. (2013) Sensitivity of composite floor system response at elevated temperatures to structural features. Eng Struct. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.026.
  20. 20.
    Zannoni M (2008) Brand bij bouwkunde, COT instituut voor veiling heids-en crisis management.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Law M (1967) Analysis of some results if experimental fires. Proceedings of the Symposium at the Fire Research Station in Borehamwood, Herts on January 24th: Behaviour of Structural Steel in Fire. pp 31–43.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations