The World Trade Center 9/11 Disaster and Progressive Collapse of Tall Buildings
- 1.4k Downloads
The collapse of the World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001 posed questions on the stability of tall buildings in fire. Understanding the collapse of the WTC Towers offers the opportunity to learn useful engineering lessons in order to improve the design of future tall buildings against fire induced collapse. This paper extends previous research on the modelling of the collapse of the WTC Towers on September 11, 2001 using a newly developed “structures in fire” simulation capability in the open source software framework OpenSees. The simulations carried out are validated by comparisons with previous work and against the findings from the NIST investigation, albeit not in the forensic sense. The column “pull in” that triggers the instability of the structure and leads to collapse is explained. The collapse mechanisms of generic composite tall buildings are also examined. This is achieved through carrying out a detailed parametric study varying the relative stiffness of the column and the floors. The two main mechanisms identified in previous research (weak and strong floor) are reproduced and criteria are established on their occurrence. The analyses performed revealed that the collapse mechanism type depended on the bending stiffness ratio and the number of floors subjected to fire and that the most probable type of failure is the strong floor collapse. The knowledge of these mechanisms is of practical use if stakeholders wish to extend the tenability of a tall building structure in a major fire.
KeywordsStructures in fire Progressive collapse Tall building collapse mechanisms WTC collapses Nonlinear dynamic thermo-mechanical analysis of structural frames OpenSees
Authors are grateful to Professor Jose Torero for helpful comments and advice on the draft of this paper and also acknowledge the assistance provided by the OpenSees team at PEER, UC Berkeley.
- 1.Torero JL (2011) Challenging attitudes on codes and safety. CTBUH J 2011(3,Special edn):36–37Google Scholar
- 2.Lamster M (2011) Castles in the air. Sci Am (special issue) doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0911-76.
- 3.FEMA (2002) World Trade Center Building performance study: data collection, preliminary observations and recommendations. Technical Report 403. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- 4.Sunder SS, Gann RG, Grosshandler WL et al (2006) Federal building and fire safety investigation of the World Trade Center disaster: final report of the national construction safety team on the collapses of the World Trade Center towers. NIST, Gaithersburg 1Google Scholar
- 5.(2012) Summary of the structural design of the WTC buildings. Fire Technol (WTC special issue, in press).Google Scholar
- 6.(2012) Summary NIST findings on aircraft damage. Fire Technol (WTC special issue, in press).Google Scholar
- 7.Summary of NIST findings on fire dynamics in WTC 1&2 “Fire Technology 2012, WTC special issue (in press).Google Scholar
- 8.(2012) Summary of NIST findings on fire damage on WTC 1,2 &7″) plus. Fire Technol (WTC special issue, in press).Google Scholar
- 11.Kodur (2003) Role of fire resistance issues in the collapse of the Twin Towers. In: Proceedings of the CIB-CTBUH conference on tall buildings, 20–23 October, Kuala Lumpur, MalaysiaGoogle Scholar
- 23.(2011) Opensees Software, University of California, Berkeley, http://opensees.berkeley.edu/index.php.Accessed 11 September 2011.
- 24.McKenna FT (1997) Object-oriented finite element programming: frameworks for analysis. Algorithms and parallel computing. Dissertation, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- 25.Usmani A, Zhang J, Jiang J, Jiang Y, Kotsovinos P, May I, Zhang J (2010) Using OpenSees for structures in fire. In: Proceedings of international conference on structures in fire, 2–4 June, Michigan, USAGoogle Scholar
- 27.M de Souza R (2000) Force-based finite element for large displacement inelastic analysis of frames. Dissertation, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar