Advertisement

Journal of Financial Services Research

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 1–35 | Cite as

Deposit Rate Advantages at the Largest Banks

  • Stefan JacewitzEmail author
  • Jonathan Pogach
Article

Abstract

We estimate differences in funding costs between the largest banks and the rest of the industry in the United States. Using a novel data set on deposit rates offered at the branch level, we document significant pricing advantages at the largest banks on comparable deposit products and deposit risk premiums. Between 2007 and 2008, the risk premium paid by the largest banks was 35 bps lower than the risk premium at other banks. This difference vanishes following a regulatory change in the deposit limit. These findings are consistent with a significant too-big-to-fail subsidy captured by the largest banks through lower risk premiums on uninsured deposits.

Keywords

Too big to fail Risk premium Deposits Interest rates 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Carlos Arteta, William F. Bassett, Steve Burton, Charles Calomiris, V. V. Chari, Bob DeYoung, Alireza Ebrahim, Ron Feldman, Levent Güntay, Robert Hauswald, Paul Kupiec, Randy Kroszner, Myron Kwast, Edith Liu, Oscar Mitnik, Don Morgan, George Pennacchi, Carlos Ramírez, Silvia Ramírez, Haluk Unal, Skander Van den Heuvel, and Smith Williams, participants in seminars at the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, the University of Maryland, the Financial Management Association’s 2012 annual meeting, the 2013 Banking Research Conference, the Research Task Force of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and China Banking Regulatory Commission, the International Atlantic Economic Society annual conference, and the Center for Financial Research at the FDIC, as well as an anonymous referee for their valuable comments and suggestions. Any remaining errors are the sole responsibility of the authors.

References

  1. Acharya VV, Mora N (2015) A crisis of banks as liquidity providers. J Financ 70(1):1–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acharya VV, Anginer D, Warburton AJ (2013) The end of market discipline? Investor expectations of implicit state guarantees SSRN eLibrary. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1573171
  3. Anderson RG, Rasche RH (2001) Retail sweep programs and bank reserves: 1994–1999. Fed Reserve Bank St Louis Rev 83:51–72Google Scholar
  4. Baker D, McArthur T (2009) The value of the “too big to fail” big bank subsidy. CEPR Reports and Issue Briefs. http://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:epo:papers:2009-36
  5. Ben-David I, Palvia A, Spatt C (2011) Bank de-leveraging and the limits to market discipline. Available at SSRN 2021505Google Scholar
  6. Bernanke BS (2009) The supervisory capital assessment program. Jekyll Island, Georgia. Federal reserve bank of Atlanta 2009 financial markets conferenceGoogle Scholar
  7. Brewer E III, Jagtiani J (2013) How much did banks pay to become too-big-to-fail and to become systemically important?. J Financ Serv Res 43(1):1–35. doi: 10.1007/s10693-011-0119-6. ISSN 0920-8550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cole RA, White LJ (2012) Déjà vu all over again: the causes of U.S. commercial bank failures this time around. J Financ Serv Res 42:5–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demirgüç-Kunt A, Huizinga H (2010) Bank activity and funding strategies: the impact on risk and returns. J Financ Econ 98(3):626–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gandhi P, Lustig H (2015) Size anomalies in U.S. bank stock returns. J Financ 70(2):733–768. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12235. ISSN 1540-6261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Heitfield E, Sabarwal T (2004) What drives default and prepayment on subprime auto loans?. J Real Estate Financ Econ 29(4):457–477. doi: 10.1023/B:REAL.0000044023.02636.e6. ISSN 0895-5638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herring RJ (2002) International financial conglomerates: implications for bank insolvency regimes. In: Policy challenges for the financial sector in the context of globalization, proceedings of the second annual policy seminar for deputy central bank governorsGoogle Scholar
  13. Hovakimian A, Kane EJ, Laeven L (2015) Tracking variation in systemic risk at us banks during 1974-2013. Available at SSRN 2031798Google Scholar
  14. Imai M (2006) Market discipline and deposit insurance reform in Japan. J Bank Financ 30(12):3433–3452. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.01.009. ISSN 0378-4266. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037842660600135X
  15. Kane EJ (2009) Extracting nontransparent safety net subsidies by strategically expanding and contracting a financial institution’s accounting balance sheet. J Financ Serv Res 36 (2–3):161–168. doi: 10.1007/s10693-009-0071-x. ISSN 0920-8550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kennickell AB, Kwast ML, Starr-McCluer M (1996) Households’ deposit insurance coverage: evidence and analysis of potential reforms. J Money Credit Bank 28(3):311–322. ISSN 00222879. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2077977
  17. Krishnakumar J, Variables Time Invariant, Models Panel Data (2006) A generalised Frisch-Waugh theorem and its implications. Contributions to economic analysis. North-Holland, Elsevier Science, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  18. Kroszner R (2016) A review of bank funding cost differentials. J Financ Serv Res 49(2):151–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li Z, Qu S, Zhang J (2011) Quantifying the value of implicit government guarantees for large financial institutions. Modeling Methodology, Moody’s AnalyticsGoogle Scholar
  20. Noss J, Sowerbutts R (2012) The implicit subsidy of banks. SSRN eLibraryGoogle Scholar
  21. Oaxaca RL, Geisler I (2003) Fixed effects models with time invariant variables: a theoretical note. Econ Lett 80(3):373–377. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1765(03)00121-6. ISSN 0165-1765. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165176503001216
  22. O’Hara M, Shaw W (1990) Deposit insurance and wealth effects: the value of being “too big to fail”. J Financ 45 (5):1587–1600. ISSN 00221082. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2328751
  23. Park K, Pennacchi G (2009) Harming depositors and helping borrowers: the disparate impact of bank consolidation. Rev Financ Stud 22(1):1–40. ISSN 08939454. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40056904
  24. Penas MF, Ünal H (2004) Gains in bank mergers: evidence from the bond markets. J Financ Econ 74(1):149–179. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.05.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Polachek SW, Kim M-K (1994) Panel estimates of the gender earnings gap: individual-specific intercept and individual-specific slope models. J Econ 61 (1):23–42. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(94)90075-2. ISSN 0304-4076. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304407694900752
  26. Roy AD (1952) Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica 20(3):431–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Santos JACD (2014) Evidence from the bond market on banks “too-big-to-fail” subsidy. Economic Policy Review 20(2):29–39Google Scholar
  28. Schweikhard F, Tsesmelidakis Z (2012) The impact of government interventions on CDs and equity markets. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1573377
  29. Ueda K, Weder di Mauro B (2013) Quantifying structural subsidy values for systemically important financial institutions. J Bank Financ 37(10):3830–3842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. VanHoose DD, Humphrey DB (2001) Sweep accounts, reserve management, and interest rate volatility. J Econ Bus 53(4):387–404. doi: 10.1016/S0148-6195(01)00041-8. ISSN 0148-6195. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148619501000418

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationWashington, D.C.USA

Personalised recommendations