Journal of Financial Services Research

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 51–76 | Cite as

Money Funds or Markets? Valuing Intermediary Services

Original Article

Abstract

Recent market developments, such as on-line trading of Treasury securities and the reduction of the minimum Treasury bill denomination to $1,000, facilitate creation of a viable alternative to U.S. Treasury money funds for investors. Comparison of a direct investment in Treasury bills to U.S. Treasury money funds shows that money fund intermediary services such as check writing, telephone exchange privileges, payroll and automatic transfers, retirement plans, and minimum initial and subsequent purchases are worth an estimated 43 basis points per year, and investors pay an additional 11 basis points for active portfolio management. An analysis of fund net cash flows shows evidence consistent with arbitrage activity between money funds and the direct investment in Treasury bills, especially for investors with few ties to the money fund manager.

Key words

Money market mutual funds intermediary services liquidity services direct investment in Treasury bills 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Campbell, T., and W. Kracaw. “Information Production, Market Signaling, and the Theory of Financial Intermediation.” Journal of Finance 35 (September 1980), 863–882.Google Scholar
  2. Capon, N., G. Fitzsimons, and R. Prince. “An Individual Level Analysis of the Mutual Fund Investment Decision.” Journal of Financial Services Research 10 (March 1996), 59–82.Google Scholar
  3. Christoffersen, S. “Why Do Money Fund Managers Voluntarily Waive Their Fees?” Journal of Finance 56 (June 2001), 1117–1140.Google Scholar
  4. Christoffersen, S., and D. Musto. “Demand Curves and the Pricing of Money Management.” Review of Financial Studies 15 (2002) 1499–1524.Google Scholar
  5. DeGennaro R., and D. Domian. “Market Efficiency and Money Market Fund Portfolio Managers: Beliefs Versus Reality.” Financial Review 31 (May, 1996), 453–474.Google Scholar
  6. Domian, D., and W. Reichenstein. “Performance and Persistence in Money Market Fund Returns.” Financial Services Review 6, no. 3 (1998), 169–183.Google Scholar
  7. Diamond, D. “Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring.” Review of Economic Studies 51 (1984), 393–414.Google Scholar
  8. Diamond, D., and P. Dybvig. “Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity.” Journal of Political Economy 109 (1983), 287–327.Google Scholar
  9. Domian, D. “Money Market Mutual Fund Maturity and Interest Rates.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 24 (November 1992), 519–527.Google Scholar
  10. Farinella, J., and T. Koch. “Seasonal Patterns in Money Market Mutual Funds.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 14 (May 2000), 261–276.Google Scholar
  11. Farrar, D., and R. Davis. “The Optimal Time to Impose Normal Operating Expenses on Newly Organized Money Market Mutual Funds: When Should You Cut the Tree?” Financial Analysts Journal (Sept./Oct. 1991), 80–84.Google Scholar
  12. Ferri, M., and H. Oberhelman. “A Study of the Management of Money Market Mutual Funds: 1975–1980.” Financial Management 10 (Autumn 1981), 24–29.Google Scholar
  13. Frye, M. “The Performance of Bank-Managed Mutual Funds.” Journal of Financial Research 24 (Fall 2001) 419–442.Google Scholar
  14. Gorton, G., and G. Pennacchi. “Financial Intermediaries and Liquidity Creation.” Journal of Finance 45 (March 1990), 49–71.Google Scholar
  15. Investment Company Institute, Mutual Fund Factbook, 2003, available online at http://ici.org.
  16. Kashyap, A., R. Raghuram, and J. Stein. “Banks as Liquidity Providers: An Explanation for the Coexistence of Lending and Deposit-Taking.” Journal of Finance 57 (February 2002), 33–73.Google Scholar
  17. Koppenhaver, G. D. “Circle Unbroken: Bank-Affiliated Money Market Mutual Funds.” Global Financial Crises: Implications for Banking and Regulation, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on Bank Structure and Competition, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, May 1999, 430–447.Google Scholar
  18. LaPlante, M. “Influences and Trends in Mutual Fund Expense Ratios.” Journal of Financial Research 24 (Spring 2001), 45–63.Google Scholar
  19. Lyon, A. “Money Market Funds and Shareholder Dilution.” Journal of Finance 39 (September 1984) 1011–1020.Google Scholar
  20. Myers, S., and R. Rajan. “The Paradox of Liquidity.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (1998), 733–771.Google Scholar
  21. Whiting, C. “Persistence in Regulatory Innovation: MMMFs and Financial Intermediaries.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 23 (1994) 321–342.Google Scholar
  22. Williamson, O. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: The Free Press, 1975.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of FinanceIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations