Feminist Literary Theory and the Law: Reading Cases with Naomi Schor

Abstract

This article brings together feminist literary theory and law by approaching a number of U.S. Federal cases on sex equality in light of the work of the renowned feminist literary critic Naomi Schor, and shows that literary theory constitutes an under-explored resource for feminist legal critique. Schor’s writings constitute a sustained rumination on the relationship between reading and feminism. Drawing on writings on language and the body by key French feminist theorists, Schor advances a method of interpretation which she terms, provocatively, ‘clitoral reading’, and which focuses on the place of details relating to women’s bodies and desires within literary and cultural discourses. In the course of her career, she analysed texts from domains as diverse as literature, philosophy, visual art, the history of fashion, and photography. I will demonstrate that her work can make a valuable contribution to legal studies by using it as an interpretative lens to re-examine U.S. Federal court judgments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

  1. 1.

    For further ‘Law and Literature’ studies in a feminist frame, see Heinzelman (2010), Kalsem (2012), Krueger (2010), Lacey (2008), and Ward (2012).

  2. 2.

    See her New York Times obituary by Martin (2001).

  3. 3.

    Back cover of Schor (2007).

  4. 4.

    Naomi Schor Papers, Brown University. https://library.brown.edu/collatoz/info.php?id=270.

  5. 5.

    444 F.3d 1104.

  6. 6.

    527 F.Supp. 229, 231 (S.D.N.Y.1981).

  7. 7.

    417 U.S. 484 (1974).

  8. 8.

    380 F.Supp. 808.

  9. 9.

    Jespersen at 1107.

  10. 10.

    Ibid at 1108.

  11. 11.

    Ibid at 1113 (my italics).

  12. 12.

    Ibid at 1112.

  13. 13.

    Ibid at 1117.

  14. 14.

    Ibid at 1118.

  15. 15.

    Ibid at 1116.

  16. 16.

    Ibid at 1118.

  17. 17.

    Rogers at 231.

  18. 18.

    Ibid at 232.

  19. 19.

    For example, Yoshino (2005, 1840) identifies Caldwell’s article as a moment in the rise of storytelling in law in the 1980s and 1990s.

  20. 20.

    Rentzer v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, 32 Cal. App. 3d 604 (Cal. Ct. App. 1973).

  21. 21.

    404 U.S. 71 (1971) and 411 U.S. 677 (1973) respectively.

  22. 22.

    Geduldig at 496–497 (my italics).

  23. 23.

    Ibid at p. 496.

  24. 24.

    Ibid.

  25. 25.

    Ibid at 501.

  26. 26.

    Ibid at 500.

  27. 27.

    Ibid at 501.

  28. 28.

    Rappaport at 808.

  29. 29.

    Ibid at 809.

  30. 30.

    For discussions of the relationship between clothing and law more generally, see Robson (2013) and Watt (2013).

  31. 31.

    Rappaport at 809.

  32. 32.

    Ibid at 810.

  33. 33.

    Ibid at 811.

  34. 34.

    Ibid at 809.

References

  1. Apter, Emily. 1992. Clitoral Hermeneutics. In Feminism and Psychoanalysis: A Critical Dictionary, ed. Elizabeth Wright, 50–51. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balkin, Jack M. 1989. The Footnote. Northwestern University Law Review 83: 275–320.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burke, Carolyn, Naomi Schor, and Margaret Whitford (eds.). 1994. Engaging with Irigaray: Feminist Philosophy and Modern European Thought. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caldwell, Paulette M. 1991. A Hair Piece: Perspectives on the Intersection of Race and Gender. Duke Law Journal 47: 365–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cixous, Hélène. 1976. The Laugh of the Medusa. Trans. by Keith Cohen and Paula Cohen. Signs 1: 875–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Crenshaw, Kimberle. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. U of Chicago Legal Forum 1989: 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ford, Richard T. 2008. The Race Card: How Bluffing About Bias Makes Race Relations Worse. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heilbrun, Carolyn, and Judith Resnik. 1990. Convergences: Law, Literature, and Feminism. Yale Law Journal 99: 1913–1957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heinzelman, Susan. 2010. Riding the Black Ram: Law, Literature, and Gender. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Irigaray, Luce. 1985a. Speculum of the Other Woman. Translated by Gillian C. Gill. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Irigaray, Luce. 1985b. This Sex Which is Not One. Translated by Catherine Porter. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kalsem, Kristin. 2012. In Contempt: Nineteenth-century Women, Law and Literature. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kristeva, Julia. 1986. About Chinese Women. In The Kristeva reader, ed. Toril Moi, 138–160. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krueger, Christine L. 2010. Reading for the Law: British Literary History and Gender Advocacy. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lacey, Nicola. 2008. Women, Crime and Character: From Moll Flanders to Tess of the d’Urbervilles. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Martin, Douglas. 2001. Naomi Schor, Literary Critic and Theorist, Is Dead at 58. New York Times, 16 December.

  17. Nussbaum, Martha C., and Alison L. LaCroix (eds.). 2013. Subversion and Sympathy: Gender, Law, and the British Novel. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Robson, Ruthann Robson. 2013. Dressing Constitutionally: Hierarchy, Sexuality, and Democracy from Our Hairstyles to Our Shoes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schor, Naomi. 1985. Breaking the Chain: Women, Theory, and French Realist Fiction. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schor, Naomi. 1995. Bad Objects: Essays Popular and Unpopular. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schor, Naomi. 2007. Reading in Detail: Aesthetics and the Feminine. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Still, Judith. 2007. French Feminist Criticism and Writing the Body. In A History of Feminist Literary Criticism, ed. Gill Pain and Susan Sellers, 263–282. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ward, Ian. 2012. Law and the Brontës. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Watt, Gary. 2013. Dress, Law and Naked Truth: A Cultural Study of Fashion and Form. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yoshino, Kenji. 2005. The City and the Poet. Yale Law Journal 114: 1835–1896.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am especially grateful to Janet Halley for her encouragement and her comments. I would also like to thank Senjuti Chakraborti, Andrew Counter, Başak Ertür, Wendy Gan, Christopher Hutton, Douglas Kerr, Julia Kuehn, and Stewart Motha for their input on an earlier version of this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Wan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wan, M. Feminist Literary Theory and the Law: Reading Cases with Naomi Schor. Fem Leg Stud 26, 163–183 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-018-9377-0

Download citation

Keywords

  • Law and literature
  • Feminism
  • Interpretation
  • Sex equality
  • Constitutional law