State Facilitated Economic Abuse: A Structural Analysis of Men Deliberately Withholding Child Support
Economic abuse is well established as a widespread and damaging element of intimate partner violence. However research largely addresses cohabiting couples, with few detailed explorations of women’s longer-term experiences after separation. Further, researchers have not developed a gendered analysis of child support related economic abuse. Such an analysis requires understanding gender as a framework that organises institutions and relationships in ways that build and reproduce hierarchical relations of difference. In this paper, I present data from in-depth interviews with 37 single mothers to pursue a structural analysis of how men’s deliberate withholding of child support (termed child maintenance in some countries) can be a form of economic abuse that is facilitated through gendered state processes and institutions that order child support transfers. I argue that masculine financial discretion structures policy and organizational practices in ways that legitimate men’s financial agency at the expense of women’s financial autonomy. On-going compliance issues are not the result of a failure of Australia’s Child Support Program, but suggest that the state’s role can be one of regulation, not prevention, of economic abuse. Thus, Australia’s Child Support Program normalises the potential for post-separation economic abuse.
KeywordsEconomic abuse Financial abuse Post-separation violence Domestic violence Child support Child maintenance Divorce
- Brownridge, Douglas A., Ko Ling Chan, Diane Hiebert-Murphy, Janice Ristock, Agnes Tiwari, Wing-Cheong Leung, and Susy C. Santos. 2008. The elevated risk for non-lethal post-separation violence in Canada: A comparison of separated, divorced, and married women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 23: 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Child Support Agency. 2010. Facts and figures 2008–09. Belconnen: Child Support Agency.Google Scholar
- Cook, Kay. 2013. Child support compliance and tax return non-filing: A feminist analysis. Australian Review of Public Affairs 11: 43–64.Google Scholar
- Commonwealth of Australia. 2014. Department of Social Services & Department of Human Services: Joint submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs. Inquiry into the Child Support Program. Canberra: DSS and DHS.Google Scholar
- Department of Human Services. 2017. Overdue child support payments. https://www.humanservices.gov.au/individuals/enablers/overdue-child-support-payments. Accessed 3 Dec 17.
- Department of Social Services. 2018a. Family assistance guide: 220.127.116.11 Exemptions from the maintenance action test. Australian Government. http://guides.dss.gov.au/family-assistance-guide/3/1/5/70. Accessed 3 Dec 17.
- Department of Social Services. 2018b. Child support guide. http://guides.dss.gov.au/child-support-guide/2/4. Accessed 3 Dec 17.
- Edin, Kathryn, and Timothy J. Nelson. 2013. Doing the best I can: Fatherhood in the inner city. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Elizabeth, Vivienne. 2015. From domestic violence to coercive control: Towards the recognition of oppressive intimacy in the family court. New Zealand Sociology 30: 26–43.Google Scholar
- Fehlberg, Belinda, Rae Kaspiew, Jenni Millbank, Fiona Kelly, and Juliet Behrens. 2014. Australian family law: The contemporary context. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- McKenzie, Hayley, and Kay Cook. 2015. “It should be a big responsibility”: Separated low-income mothers’ evaluation of child support arrangements and the conduct of fathers. Australian Journal of Family Law 29: 135–156.Google Scholar
- McMahon, Marylin, and Paul McGorrery. 2016. Emotional abuse, intimidation and economic abuse in the context of family violence: The Tasmanian experience. University of Tasmania Law Review 35: 1–22.Google Scholar
- Murphy, John, Suellen Murray, Jenny Chalmers, Sonia Martin, and Greg Marston. 2011. Half a citizen: Life on welfare in Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
- Natalier, Kristin, Kay Cook, and Torna Pitman. 2016. Payee mothers’ interactions with the Department of Human Services-Child Support. Family Matters 97: 30–40.Google Scholar
- Patrick, Rebecca, Kay Cook, and Ann Taket. 2007. Multiple barriers to obtaining child support: Experiences of women leaving violent partners. Just Policy: A Journal of Australian Social Policy 45: 21–29.Google Scholar
- Qu, Lixia, Ruth Weston, Lawrie Moloney, Rae Kaspiew, and Jessie Dunstan. 2014. Post-separation parenting, property and relationship dynamics after five years. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.Google Scholar
- Risman, Barbara J. 1999. Gender vertigo. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee. 2013. Additional budget estimates, 14 February 2013. Answers to questions on notice: Child Support Agency. http://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/Estimates/Live/clac_ctte/estimates/add_1213/DHS/Answers/027.ashx. Accessed 2 Dec 2014.
- Smart, Carol, and Bren Neale. 1999. Family fragments?. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
- Smith, Dorothy. 1987. The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
- Stark, Evan. 2007. Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar