Feminist Legal Studies

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 127–145 | Cite as

Law’s Gendered Subtext: The Gender Order of Restaurant Work and Making Sexual Harassment Normal

Article

Abstract

Analysing sexual harassment law in British Columbia, this paper argues that in highly sexualised work environments, in which practices including sexual ‘jokes’ or innuendo may be common, law embodies and (re)creates the gendered subtext of the workplace. When a complaint of sexual harassment from a sexualised workplace is raised in a legal forum, a complainant has an obligation to clearly object to the sexual remarks, ‘jokes,’ banter, etc.—which may be the ‘norm’—to show the conduct in question was unwelcome. At the same time, however, a workplace may be structured, in part by law, in a way that restricts employee resistance to uncomfortable sexual experiences. This is the case, I argue, for women working in full-service restaurants when it comes to sexual interactions with customers. This paper explores how restaurant work, in the Canadian context with a focus on the province of British Columbia, is organised in a manner that makes women vulnerable to enduring sexually harassing practices as a routine part of their jobs.

Keywords

Sexual harassment Law Restaurant work Gender Canada 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to sincerely thank my research participants for sharing a part of their lives. This research would not be possible without them. Thank you to the anonymous reviewers and the editorial board for their considerate feedback on earlier drafts of this paper. I am also so grateful to Judy Fudge, Hester Lessard, and Dorothy Smith for the support they provide me with in my doctoral studies, including reading earlier iterations of this work. This research was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada and the Interuniversity Research Centre on Work and Globalization (CRIMT).

References

  1. Acker. Joan. 2006. Inequality regimes: Gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society 20(4): 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adkins, Lisa. 1995. Gendered work: Sexuality, family and the labour market. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aggarwal, Arjun, and Madhu Gupta. 2000. Sexual harassment in the workplace, 3rd ed. Toronto: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  4. Albin, Einat. 2011. A worker-employer-customer triangle: The case of tips. Industrial Law Journal 40(2): 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benedet, Janine. 1995. Hostile environment sexual harassment claims and the unwelcome influence of rape law. Michigan Journal of Gender & Law 3: 125–174.Google Scholar
  6. Brodsky, Gwen and Shelagh Day. 2014. Strengthening human rights: Why British Columbia needs a human rights commission. Vancouver: The Poverty and Human Rights Centre and Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives–BC Office. https://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/reports/strengthening-human-rights. Accessed 15 Aug 2015.
  7. Clément, Dominique. 2010. Human rights law and sexual discrimination in British Columbia, 1953-83. In The West and Beyond, ed. Sara Carter, Alvin Finkel, and Peter Fortna, 297–325. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Clément, Dominique. 2014. Equality deferred: Sex discrimination and British Columbia’s human rights state, 1953–84. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cobble, Dorothy. 1991. Dishing it out: Waitresses and their unions in the twentieth century. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  10. Erickson, Karla. 2004. Bodies at work: Performing service in American restaurants. Space and Culture 7(1): 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Faraday, Fay. 1994. Dealing with sexual harassment in the workplace: The promise and limitations of human rights discourse. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 32(1): 32–64.Google Scholar
  12. Fudge, Judy. 1996. Rungs on the labour law ladder: Using gender to challenge hierarchy. Saskatchewan Law Review 60(2): 237–263.Google Scholar
  13. Gallivan, Kathleen. 1991. Sexual harassment after Janzen v. Platy: The transformative possibilities. University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review 49(1): 27–61.Google Scholar
  14. Giuffre, Patti, and Christine Williams. 1994. Boundary lines: Labeling sexual harassment in restaurants. Gender & Society 8(3): 378–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Glasbeek, Harry. 2004. The impact of federalism on Canadian labour law. In Federalism and labour law: Comparative perspectives, ed. Othmar Vanachter, and Martin Vranken, 51–72. Intersentia: Antwerp.Google Scholar
  16. Hall, Elaine. 1993a. Smiling, deferring, and flirting: Doing gender by giving “good service”. Work and Occupations 20(4): 452–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall, Elaine. 1993b. Waitering/waitressing: Engendering the work of table servers. Gender & Society 7(3):329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hochschild, Arlie. 1983. The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  19. Huebner, Lisa. 2008. It is part of the job: Waitresses and nurses define sexual harassment. Sociological Viewpoints 24: 75–90.Google Scholar
  20. Jayaraman, Saru. 2013. Behind the kitchen door. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kingston, Anne. 2012. The hottest new trend in casual dining? The ‘breastaurant.’ Maclean’s, 25 April. http://www.macleans.ca/economy/business/get-ready-for-the-breastaurant/ Accessed 10 Aug 2015.
  22. LaPointe, Eleanor. 1992. Relationships with waitresses: Gendered social distance in restaurant hierarchies. Qualitative Sociology 15(4): 377–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lerum, Kari. 2004. Power and camaraderie in service work. Gender & Society 18(6): 756–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Loe, M. 1996. Working for men—at the intersection of power, gender, and sexuality. Sociological Inquiry 66(4): 399–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matulewicz, Kaitlyn. 2015. Law and the construction of institutionalized sexual harassment in restaurants. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 30(3): 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McGinley, Ann. 2007. Harassing girls at the hard rock: Masculinities in sexualized environments. University of Illinois Law Review 27(4): 1229–1277.Google Scholar
  27. Pringle, Rosemary. 1988. Secretaries talk: Sexuality, power and work. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  28. Quinn, B. 2000. The paradox of complaining: Law, humor, and harassment in the everyday world of work. Law & Social Inquiry 25(4): 1151–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Restaurant Opportunities Center of New York. 2005. Behind the kitchen door: Pervasive inequality in New York City’s thriving restaurant industry. http://rocunited.org/files/2013/04/reports_bkd-ny.pdf Accessed 15 Aug 2015.
  30. Restaurant Opportunities Centers United and Forward Together. 2014. The glass floor: Sexual harassment in the restaurant industry. New York: Restaurant Opportunities.Google Scholar
  31. Rogers, J.K., and K.D. Henson. 1997. “Hey, why don’t you wear a shorter skirt?” Structural vulnerability and the organization of sexual harassment in temporary clerical employment. Gender & Society 11(2): 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sheppard, C. 2010. Inclusive equality: The relational dimensions of systemic discrimination in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, D.E. 1987. The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Spradley, J.P., and B.J. Mann. 1975. The cocktail waitress: Women’s work in a man’s world. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  35. Statistics Canada. 2006a. Census of population, statistics Canada catalogue no. 97-564-XCB2006006 (British Columbia/ Colombie-Britannique, Code59).Google Scholar
  36. Statistics Canada. 2006b. Census of population, statistics Canada catalogue no. 97-564-XCB2006006.Google Scholar
  37. Statistics Canada, 2006c. Census of population, statistics Canada catalogue no. 97-564-XCB2006005.Google Scholar
  38. Urry, J. 1990. The tourist gaze: Leisure and travel in contemporary societies. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Woods, Susan. 1979. Waitressing: Taking control of our work. Quest 5: 82–94.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations