Feminist Legal Studies

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 181–197 | Cite as

Complicating Kinship and Inheritance: Older Lesbians’ and Gay Men’s Will-Writing in England

Article

Abstract

This article complicates the idea that lesbian and gay kinship is based primarily on friendship, voluntarism and being free from duty and obligation. It also offers a more nuanced understanding of wills as a rich source of evidence for making claims about kinship, family and relationships. It analyses conversations about will-writing with fifteen older lesbians and gay men, taken from interviews which formed part of a wider socio-legal study on the intersection of ageing, gender and sexuality (Westwood in Ageing, Gender and Sexuality: equality in later life. PhD thesis, School of Law, University of Keele, UK, 2015). The analysis identifies a wide range of kinship formations and composition going beyond “family of choice” narratives, and also both connections and disconnections between ties of love and affection and disposal of assets in wills. Participants’ will-writing reflected four types of prioritisation: prioritising children; prioritising friends; prioritising siblings; mixed priorities. In contrast with accounts of “families of choice” as being duty-free, a sense of duty, especially towards biological family members, was evident in a number of interviews. I suggest that wills can sometimes be a rich source of evidence about kinship, but only when analysis takes into account the complexities and contingencies which can be involved.

Keywords

Lesbian Gay Kinship Family Relationships Wills 

Notes

Acknowledgments

My sincere thanks go to the anonymous reviewers and editors for extensive feedback on an earlier draft of this article, and to Ruth Fletcher and Rosie Harding for their excellent supervision of my Ph.D. research.

References

  1. Barker, Nicola. 2006. Sex and the civil partnership act: The future of (Non) conjugality? Feminist Legal Studies 14(2): 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barker, Nicola. 2012. Not the marrying kind: A feminist critique of same-sex marriage. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes, Marian. 2012. Care in everyday life: An ethic of care in practice. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Browne, Kath. 2005. Snowball sampling: Using social networks to research nonheterosexual women. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8(1): 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr, Helen, and Caroline Hunter. 2012. Unravelling law’s kinning practices: Feminism, fictive families and the Albert Kennedy Trust. Feminist Legal Studies 20(2): 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarke, Victoria. 2005. Feminist perspectives on lesbian parenting: A review of the literature 1972–2002. Psychology of Women Section Review 7(2): 11–23.Google Scholar
  8. Cronin, Ann, and Andrew King. 2014. Only connect? Older lesbian, gay and bisexual (LGB) adults and social capital. Ageing and Society 34(2): 258–279.Google Scholar
  9. Delgado, Richard, and Jean Stefancic. 2012. Critical race theory: An introduction, 2nd ed. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Donovan, Catherine, and Marianne Hester. 2010. “I Hate the Word Victim”: An exploration of recognition of domestic violence in same sex relationships. Social Policy and Society 9(2): 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Douglas, Gillian, et al. 2011. Enduring love? Attitudes to family and inheritance law in England and wales. Journal of Law and Society 38(2): 245–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finch, Janet, and Jennifer Mason. 1993. Negotiating family responsibilities. London: Tavistock/Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Finch, Janet, and Jennifer Mason. 2000. Passing on: Kinship and inheritance in England. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Fredriksen-Goldsen, Karen I., et al. 2013. The physical and mental health of lesbian, gay male, and bisexual (LGB) older adults: The role of key health indicators and risk and protective factors. The Gerontologist 53(4): 664–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grabham, Emily, Davina Cooper, Jane Krishnadas, and Didi Herman (eds.). 2008. Intersectionality and beyond: Law, power and the politics of location. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Grossman, Arnold. 2008. Conducting research among older lesbian, gay and bisexual adults. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 20: 51–67.Google Scholar
  17. Guasp, Avril. 2011. Lesbian, gay and bisexual people in later life. London: Stonewall.Google Scholar
  18. Harding, Rosie. 2006. “Dogs are ‘registered’, people shouldn’t be”: Legal consciousness and lesbian and gay rights. Social & Legal Studies 15(4): 511–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harding, Rosie. 2007. Sir Mark Potter and the protection of the traditional family: Why same sex marriage is (still) a feminist issue. Feminist Legal Studies 15(2): 223–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harding, Rosie. 2011. Regulating sexuality: Legal consciousness in lesbian and gay lives. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hasson, Eliza. 2013. “Where There’s a Will There’s a Woman”: Exploring the gendered nature of will making. Feminist Legal Studies 21(1): 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heaphy, Brian. 2009. The storied, complex lives of older GLBT adults: Choice and its limits in older lesbian and gay narratives of relational life. Journal of GLBT Family Studies 5: 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heaphy, Brian, Andrew Yip, and Debbie Thompson. 2004. Ageing in a non-heterosexual context. Ageing & Society 24(6): 881–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heaphy, Brian, Carol Smart, and Anna Einarsdottir. 2013. Same sex marriages: New generations, new relationships (genders and sexualities in the social sciences). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Kindle Edition.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Humphrey, Alun, et al. 2010. Inheritance and the family: Attitudes to will-making and intestacy. London: National Centre for Social Research, Kings College, London.Google Scholar
  26. Jaconelli, Joseph. 2012. Wills as public documents—Privacy and property rights. Cambridge Law Journal 71(1): 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kerridge, Roger. 2011. Freedom of testation in England and wales. In The law of succession: Testamentary freedom, European perspectives, ed. M. Anderson, and E. Arroyo I Amayuelas, 129–154. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.Google Scholar
  28. Knocker, Sally, et al. 2012. Opening doors and opening minds: Sharing one project’s experience of successful community engagement. In Lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender ageing: biographical approaches for inclusive care and support, ed. Richard Ward, Ian Rivers, and Mike Sutherland, 150–164. London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  29. McDermott, Elizabeth. 2011. The world some have won: Sexuality, class and inequality. Sexualities 14(1): 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meyer, Ilan H., and Patrick A. Wilson. 2009. Sampling lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology 56(1): 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Monk, Daniel. 2011. Sexuality and succession law: Beyond formal equality. Feminist Legal Studies 19: 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Monk, Daniel. 2013. EM forster’s will: an overlooked posthumous publication. Legal Studies 33(4): 572–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Monk, Daniel. 2014a. Writing (gay and lesbian) wills. Oñati Socio-legal Series 4(2): 306–322.Google Scholar
  34. Monk, Daniel. 2014b. The pleasures and perils of inheritance. Studies in Gender and Sexuality 15(3): 239–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morrell, Gareth, Matt Bernard, and Robin Legard. 2009. The law of intestate succession: Exploring attitudes among non-traditional families final report [online]. London: NATCEN. Accessible at: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/law_of_intestate_succession_research.pdf. Accessed 26 December 2014.
  36. Nordqvist, Petra. 2014. Bringing kinship into being: Connectedness, donor conception and lesbian parenthood. Sociology 48(2): 268–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Padavic, Irene, and Jonniann Butterfield. 2011. Mothers, fathers, and “Mathers” negotiating a lesbian co-parental identity. Gender & Society 25(2): 176–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pahl, Ray, and Liz Spencer. 2004. Personal communities: not simply families of ‘fate’ or ‘choice’. Current Sociology 52(2): 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pugh, Steve. 2002. The forgotten: A community without a generation. In Handbook of lesbian and gay studies, ed. Diane Richardson, and Steven Seidman, 161–181. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rich, Stephanie, et al. 2011. ‘Unnatural’, ‘Unwomanly’, ‘Uncreditable’ and ‘Undervalued’: The significance of being a childless woman in Australian society. Gender Issues 28(4): 226–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Richardson, Diane, and Surya Monro. 2012. Sexuality, equality and diversity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  42. Roseneil, Sasha, and Shelley Budgeon. 2004. Cultures of intimacy and care beyond ‘The Family’: Personal life and social change in the early 21st century. Current Sociology 52(2): 135–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Semmer, Norbert K., et al. 2008. The emotional meaning of instrumental social support. International Journal of Stress Management 15(3): 235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smart, Carol. 2007. Same sex couples and marriage: Negotiating relational landscapes with families and friends. The Sociological Review 55(4): 671–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Taylor, Yvette. 2009. Complexities and complications: Intersections of class and sexuality. Journal of Lesbian Studies 13(2): 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Taylor, Yvette. 2013. The tie that binds: Intimacy, class and sexuality. In Mapping intimacies: Relations, exchanges and affects, ed. Jamie Hekert, and Tam Sanger, 15–34. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. Tornello, Samantha L., and Charlotte J. Patterson. 2015. Timing of parenthood and experiences of gay fathers: A life course perspective. Journal of GLBT Family Studies 11(1): 35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weeks, Jeffrey, Brian Heaphy, and Catherine Donovan. 2001. Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weston, Kath. 1991. Families we choose. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Westwood, Sue. 2013. Researching older lesbians: Problems and partial solutions. Journal of Lesbian Studies 17(3–4): 380–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Westwood, Sue. 2015. Ageing, gender and sexuality: Equality in later life. PhD thesis, School of Law, University of Keele, UK. Available at http://grai.org.au/sites/default/files/library/Westwood%202014_Dissertation_Full_Draft_FF.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2015.
  52. Yosso, Tara J. 2005. Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race, Ethnicity and Education 8(1): 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Research on Ageing and Gender (CRAG)University of SurreyGuildfordUK

Personalised recommendations