Feminist Legal Studies

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 185–193 | Cite as

The Canadian Supreme Court and Domestic Violence: R v Ryan, 2013 SCC 3

Case Note

Abstract

This paper analyses the judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada in the case of R v Ryan, 2013 SCC 3. This is a very significant decision from a variety of perspectives. The judgment is an important addition to the Canadian criminal law jurisprudence as it clarifies the scope of the defence of duress. However, from a feminist perspective, the case also highlights issues relating to situations in which victims of domestic violence eventually kill their partners following long cycles of abuse. In addition, the judgment serves as a reminder of the substantial problems which still exist regarding the responses of criminal justice systems to victims of domestic violence and the abuse they have suffered.

Keywords

Domestic violence Criminal justice responses Supreme Court of Canada Duress Self defence 

References

  1. Armatta, Judith. 1997. Getting beyond the law’s complicity in intimate violence against women. Willamette Law Review 33: 774–845.Google Scholar
  2. Connelly, Clare, and Kate Cavanagh. 2007. Domestic abuse, civil protection orders and the ‘new criminologies’: Is there any value in engaging with the law? Feminist Legal Studies 15: 259–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Freedman, Ann E. 2003. Fact-finding in civil domestic violence cases: Secondary traumatic stress and the need for compassionate witnesses. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law 11: 567–656.Google Scholar
  4. Hague, Gill, and Ellen Malos. 2005. Domestic violence: Action for change. Cheltenham: New Clarion Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hanmer, Jalna, and Sue Griffiths. 2001. Effective policing. In What works in reducing domestic violence? A comprehensive guide for professionals, ed. Julie Taylor-Browne, 123–150. London: Whiting & Birch Ltd.Google Scholar
  6. Hughes, Breedagh. 2006. Can domestic violence be considered a violation of human rights law? British Journal of Midwifery 14: 192.Google Scholar
  7. McQuigg, Ronagh. 2011. International human rights law and domestic violence. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.Google Scholar
  8. Merry, Sally E. 2003. Rights talk and the experience of law: Implementing women’s human rights to protection from violence. Human Rights Quarterly 25: 343–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mullender, Audrey, and Gill Hague. 2001. Women survivors’ views. In What works in reducing domestic violence? A comprehensive guide for professionals, ed. Julie Taylor-Browne, 1–33. London: Whiting & Birch Ltd.Google Scholar
  10. Schneider, Elizabeth M. 2000. Battered women and feminist lawmaking. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawQueen’s University BelfastBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations