Feminist Legal Studies

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 137–165 | Cite as

Identities in reconstruction: from rights of recognition to reflection in post-disaster reconstruction processes

Article

Abstract

This article examines the role of rights in both governing and shaping women’s relationship with the reconstruction process and their position in the reconstructed society. Through four years of empirical research in the post-earthquake reconstruction process in Maharashtra, India, this article focuses upon how women’s rights in social reconstruction are contingent upon processes of recognition. From the United Nations to local women’s organising, the article considers how women’s rights to “determine the pattern of their lives and the future of society” (United Nations Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (C.E.D.A.W.). General Recommendation No. 23 (1997), Article 7, para. 9.) are dependent upon processes of recognition. Through a critique of cultural, material and spatial acts and frameworks of recognition within the U.N., World Bank, State Government, public interest litigation, personal and nonformal law, rights are seen to actively and hierarchically construct either a modern, liberal subject or a religious, communitarian subject, which both either deny or prescribe agency. The experience of women’s organising reveals the possibility of reconstructing a feminist rights strategy of reflection.

Keywords

agency identities postcolonial recognition reconstruction reflection rights 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agnes F. (1999) Law and Gender Inequality. New Delhi, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcoff L. (1988) Cultural Feminism Versus Post-Structuralism: The Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 13(3):405–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bannerji H. (2000) Projects of Hegemony: Towards a Critique of Subaltern Studies’ ‚Resolution of the Women’s Question’. Economic and Political Weekly 35 11:902–920Google Scholar
  4. Benhabib S. (2002) The Claims of Culture, Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. New Jersey, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhagwati P.N. (1987) Social Action Litigation: The Indian Experience. In Tiruchelvam N., Coomaraswamy R. (eds) The Role of the Judiciary in Plural Societies, London: Frances Pinter, 20–31Google Scholar
  6. Boyd S.B. (1999) Family, Law and Sexuality: Feminist Engagements. Social and Legal Studies 8:369–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Butler, J., Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge, 1999 [1st pub. 1990])Google Scholar
  8. Chatterjee P. (1993) The Nation and its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. New Jersey, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Chinkin C., Charlesworth H. (2000) The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis. Manchester, Manchester University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Conaghan J. (2000) Reassessing the Feminist Theoretical Project in Law. Journal of Law and Society 27 3:351–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coomaraswamy R. (1994) To Bellow Like a Cow: Women, Ethnicity, and the Discourse of Rights. In Cook R. (ed) Human Rights of Women: National and International Perspectives, Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 39–57Google Scholar
  12. Datar C. (1999) Non-Brahmin Renderings of Feminism in Maharashtra: Is it a more Emancipatory Force? Economic and Political Weekly 34/41:2964–2968Google Scholar
  13. Dhanda M. (2000) Representation for Women: Should Feminists Support Quotas? Economic and Political Weekly 35/33:2969–2975Google Scholar
  14. Ebert T.L. (1996) Ludic Feminism and After: Postmodernism, Desire, and Labor in Late Capitalism. Michigan, University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Enarson E., Morrow B.H. (1998) The Gendered Terrain of Disaster Through Women’s Eyes. Westport, Conn., PraegerGoogle Scholar
  16. Engineer A.A. (1994) Muslim Family Law. In Sarkar L., Sivaramayya B. (eds) Women and Law: Contemporary Problems, New Delhi, Vikas Publishing House, 50–65Google Scholar
  17. Eschle C. (2002) Engendering Global Democracy. International Feminist Journal of Politics 4/3:315–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Everett J. (2001) All the Women Were Hindu and All the Muslims Were Men: State, Identity Politics and Gender, 1917–1951. Economic and Political Weekly 36(23):2071–2080Google Scholar
  19. Fraser N. (1995) What’s Critical About Critical Theory? In Meehan J. (ed) Feminists Read Habermas. New York, Routledge, 27–51Google Scholar
  20. Fraser N. (1997) Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Fraser N., Honneth A. (2003) Redistribution or Recognition? A Political- Philosophical Exchange. London, VersoGoogle Scholar
  22. Freire P. (1970) Cultural Action For Freedom. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Educational ReviewGoogle Scholar
  23. Geetha V.P. (1998) Women and an Ethnic of Citizenship. Economic and Political Weekly 33/17:WS-9–WS-15Google Scholar
  24. Gopalan, P., Responding to Earthquakes: People’s Participation in Reconstruction and Rehabilitation (Division for the Advancement of Women, U.N. doc. EGM/NATDIS/2001/OP.3, 2001)Google Scholar
  25. Gorhe, N., “Social and Economic Rehabilitation of Earthquake Affected Women – Interventions by Stree Adhar Kendra”, in Organisation and Administration of Relief and Rehabilitation Following Marathwada Earthquake, eds. S. Parasuraman & G.D. Sapir (Mumbai: Unit for Rural Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences and Brussels: Centre for Study of Epidemiology of Disasters, Catholic University of Louvain, 1995), pp. 159–171Google Scholar
  26. Government of Maharashtra (1994) Earthquake Rehabilitation Policy of Government of Maharashtra. Mumbai, Earthquake Rehabilitation CellGoogle Scholar
  27. Gupta, K., “Economic Rehabilitation of Earthquake Affected Women to Be Implemented by M.A.V.I.M.”, in Organisation and Administration of Relief and Rehabilitation Following Marathwada Earthquake, 1993, eds. S. Parasuraman & G.D. Sapir (Mumbai: Unit for Rural Studies, Tata Institute of Social Sciences, and Brussels: Centre for Study of Epidemiology of Disasters, Catholic University of Louvain, 1995), 147–157Google Scholar
  28. Hennessey R. (1993) Material Feminism and the Politics of Discourse. New York, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Heyes C.J. (2003) Can There be a Queer Politics of Recognition? In Nelson H.L., Fiore R. (eds) Recognition, Responsibility and Rights: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory, Lanham, MD, Rowman & Littlefield, 1–10Google Scholar
  30. John M.E. (2000) Alternative Modernities? Reservations and Women’s Movement in 20th Century India. Economic and Political Weekly 35/43–44:3822–3829Google Scholar
  31. Kalpagam U. (2002) Perspectives for a Grassroots Feminist Theory. Economic and Political Weekly 35/43–44:4686–4693Google Scholar
  32. Kapur R., Cossman B. (1999) Secularism’s Last Sigh? Hindutva and the (Mis) Rule of Law. New Delhi, Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  33. Kishwar, M., “Equality of Opportunities v Equality of Results”, Economic and Political Weekly 35/47 (2000), 4151–4156Google Scholar
  34. Krishnadas, J., Rights in Reconstruction (London: Pluto Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar
  35. Lama-Rewal S.T. (2001) Fluctuating, Ambivalent Legitimacy of Gender as a Political Category. Economic and Political Weekly 36/17:1435–1447Google Scholar
  36. Lister R. (1997) Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke, Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  37. Mahoney M.R. (1994) Victimisation or Oppression? Women’s Lives, Violence and Agency. In Fineman M.A., Mykitiuk R. (eds) The Public Nature of Private Violence The Discovery of Domestic Abuse, New York, Routledge, 59–82Google Scholar
  38. Mahmood S. (2001) Feminist Theory, Embodiment and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival. Cultural Anthropology 16/2:202–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mahmood S. (2005) The Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject New Jersey, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  40. Majumdar, R., “History of Women’s Rights: A Non-Historicist Reading”, Economic and Political Weekly (31 May 2003) 72–82Google Scholar
  41. Marchand, M.H. & Runyan, A. (eds.), Gender and Global Restructuring: Sightings, Sites and Resistances (New York: Routledge, 2000)Google Scholar
  42. McNay L. (2000) Gender and Agency; Reconfiguring the Subject in Feminist and Social Theory. Cambridge, Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  43. Menon N. (1998) State/Gender/Community; Citizenship in Contemporary India. Economic and Political Weekly 33/5:PE-2–PE-10Google Scholar
  44. Menon N. (2000) Elusive Woman, Feminism and Women’s Reservation Bill. Economic and Political Weekly 35/43–44:3835–3844Google Scholar
  45. Menon R. (1998) Reproducing the Legitimate Community, Secularity, Sexuality and the State in Post-partition India. In Jeffery P., Basu A. (ed) Appropriating Gender, Women’s Activism and Politicized Religion in South Asia, New York, Routledge 15–32Google Scholar
  46. Midha S. (1990) Women, Law and Social Justice. In Devasia L., Devasia V.V. (eds) Women in India, Equality, Social Justice and Development, New Delhi, Indian Social Institute, 69–79Google Scholar
  47. Mohanty C. (1988) Under Western Eyes: Feminism Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. Feminist Review 30:61–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mohanty C. (2002) Under Western Eyes’ Revisited: Feminist Solidarity through Anticapitalist Struggles. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28/2:499–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mohanty C., Alexander J. (1997) Feminist Geneologies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures. New York, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  50. Mukhopadhyay M. (1998) Legally Dispossessed, Gender Identity and the Process of Law. Calcutta, StreeGoogle Scholar
  51. Nanda M. (2001) Hitching Dalit Modernity to Anti-Modernist Wagon. Economic and Political Weekly 36/17:1480–1483Google Scholar
  52. Odim-Johnson C. (1991) Common Themes, Different Contexts, Third World Women and Feminism. In Mohanty C., Russo A., Torres L. (eds) Third World Women – the Politics of Feminism, Bloomington, University of Indiana Press, 314–327Google Scholar
  53. Philipps A. (1991) Engendering Democracy Cambridge, Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  54. Randall V., Waylen G. (1998) Gender, Politics and the State London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  55. Rege S. (1998) Dalit Women Talk Differently: A Critique of ‚Difference’ and Towards a Dalit Feminist Standpoint Position. Economic and Political Weekly 33/44:WS-39–WS-46Google Scholar
  56. Rege S. (2000) ‚Real Feminism’ and Dalit Women: Scripts of Denial and Accusation. Economic and Political Weekly 35/6:492–495Google Scholar
  57. Roy A. (2001) Community, Women Citizens and a Women’s Politics. Economic and Political Weekly 36/17:1441–1447Google Scholar
  58. Saheli, Women Organising (New Delhi: Kali for Women, 1997)Google Scholar
  59. Schneider E.M. (1991) The Dialectics of the Rights and Politics: Perspectives from the Women’s Movement. In Fineman M., Thomadsen N. (eds) At the Boundaries of Law, Feminism and Legal Theory, New York, Routledge, 301–317Google Scholar
  60. Smart C. (1995) Law, Crime and Sexuality, Essays in Feminism. London, SageGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith D.E. (1990) Texts, Facts and Femininity Exploring the Relations of Ruling. London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  62. Sonalkar W. (1999) An Agenda for Gender Politics. Economic and Political Weekly 34/1–2:24–29Google Scholar
  63. Spivak G.C. (1988) Can the Subaltern Speak? In Nelson C., Grossberg L. (eds) Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, Basingstoke, Macmillan Education, 271–313Google Scholar
  64. Taylor C. (1992) The Politics of Recognition. In Gutmann A. (ed) Multiculturalism: Examining The Politics of Recognition, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 25–73Google Scholar
  65. Taylor C. (2005) Conditions of an Unforced Consensus on Human Rights. In Bauer J.R., Bell D.A. (eds) The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 124–147 Google Scholar
  66. Voet R. (1998) Feminism and Citizenship. London, SageGoogle Scholar
  67. Walby S. (2002) Feminism in a Global Era. Economy and Society 31/4:533–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Walker A. (1984) In Search of Our Mothers’ Gardens; Womanist Prose. London, Women’s PressGoogle Scholar
  69. Yasuaki O. (2004) Toward an Intercivilisational Approach to Human Rights. In The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, Bauer J.R., Bell D.A. (eds) Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 103–124Google Scholar
  70. Young I.M. (1990) Justice and the Politics of Difference. New Jersey, Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of LawKeele UniversityKeeleUK

Personalised recommendations