Abstract
Empirical research in this field has underlined the diversity of the cohabitation population, the existence of the common law marriage myth and the lack of consensus on the best way forward for reform of the law in England and Wales. Against the backdrop of the English Law Commission’s on-going project on cohabitation law, this article will explore the reasons found by recent research for people’s choice of cohabitation over marriage, the interrelationship between commitment and economic vulnerability and the tension in feminist debates as to whether an extension of rights for opposite-sex cohabitants that are analogous to married spouses (either by an opt-in model or opt-out model) might be an appropriate solution or a reinforcement of patriarchal marriage values. It will also consider, given recent research findings and other initiatives aimed at raising awareness about the legal differences between different styles of cohabitation relationship, law’s dual and conflicting role in shaping regulated family structures whilst both protecting vulnerable family members inside and outside such structures and at the same time also offering socially acceptable standards of dispute resolution in this most personal of spheres.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arthur S., Lewis J., Maclean M. (2002) Settling Up. National Centre for Social Research, London
Bailey-Harris R. (1996) Law and the Unmarried Couple – Oppression or Liberation? Child and Family Law Quarterly 8:137–147
Barlow A., Duncan S. (2000) Family Law, Moral Rationalities and New Labour’s Communitarianism: Part II”, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 22(2):129–143
Barlow, A., Duncan, S., James, G. & Park, A., “Just a Piece of Paper? Marriage and Cohabitation in Britain”, in British Social Attitudes: The 18th Report, eds. A.␣Park, J. Curtice, K. Thomson, L. Jarvis & C. Bromley (London: Sage, 2001), 29–57
Barlow A., Duncan S., James G., Park A. (2005) Cohabitation. Marriage and the Law: Social Change and Legal Reform in the 21st Century. Hart Publishing, Oxford
Barlow A., James G. (2004) Regulating Marriage and Cohabitation in 21st Century Britain. Modern Law Review 67(2):143–176
Barlow, A. & Probert, R., eds., “Special Issue on Family Law and Policy: Cohabitation and Marriage Promotion”, Law and Policy 26/1 (2004)
Bottomley A. (1998) Women and Trust(s): Portraying the Family in the Gallery of Law. In: Bright S., Dewar J. (eds) Land Law: Themes and Perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 206–228
Burgoyne C. (1995) “Financial Organisation and Decision-Making Within Western ‚Households’”. Journal of Economic Psychology 16(3):421–430
Clive E. (1980) Marriage an Unnecessary Legal Concept? In: Eekelaar J., Katz S. (eds) Marriage in Contemporary Societies. Butterworths, Toronto, pp. 71–81
Cretney S. (2003) Family Law in the Twentieth Century – A History. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Deech R. (1980) The Case Against the Legal Recognition of Cohabitation. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 29:480–497
Dewar J. (1998) The Normal Chaos of Family Law. Modern Law Review 61:467–485
Douglas G. (2000) “Marriage, Cohabitation, and Parenthood: From Contract to Status?”. In: Katz S., Eekelaar J., Maclean M. (eds) Cross Currents: Family Law and Policy in the US and England. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 211–233
Duncan S., Barlow A., James G. (2005) Why Don’t They Marry? Cohabitation, Commitment and DIY Marriage. Child and Family Law Quarterly 17(3):383–398
Eekelaar, J., ed., “Unmarried Cohabitation in Europe” Special Issue: International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15/1 (2001)
Eekelaar J., Maclean M. (2004) “Marriage and the Moral Bases of Personal Relationships”. Journal of Law and Society 31(4):510–539
Ermisch J., Francesconi M. (2000) “Cohabitation in Great Britain: Not for Long, But Here to Stay”. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 163(2):153–171
Fineman M. (1995) The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. Routledge, New York, London
Freeman M. (1984) Legal Ideologies, Patriarchal Precedents and Domestic Violence. In: Freeman M. (eds) The State, the Law and the Family: Critical Perspectives. Sweet & Maxwell, London, pp. 51–78
Giddens A. (1992) The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Polity Press, Cambridge
Glennon L. (2000) Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd: An Endorsement of the Functional Family?. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 14:226–255
Hale B. (2004) Baroness of Richmond, “Unmarried Couples in Family Law”. Family Law 34:419–426
Harvie-Clark, S., “Family Law (Scotland) Bill: Cohabitation (Updated)” Scottish Parliament Information Centre Briefing 3 March 05/11 (Edinburgh: The Scottish Parliament, 2005)
Home Office (1998) Supporting Families. Home Office, London
Jamieson L., Anderson M., McCrone D., Bechhofer F., Stewart R., Li Y. (2002) Cohabitation and Commitment: Partnership Plans of Young men and Women. The Sociological Review 50(3):356–377
Johnson M. (1991) Commitment to Personal Relationships. In: Jones W., Perlman D. (eds) Advances in Personal Relationships. Jessica Kingsley, London, pp. 117–143
Kiernan K. (2004) Cohabitation and Divorce across Nations and Generations. In: Chase-Lansdale P., Kiernan K., Friedman R. (eds) Human Development Across Lives and Generations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 139–170
Kiernan K. (2004b) “Unmarried Cohabitation and Parenthood in Britain and Europe”. Law and Policy 26(1):33–55
Law Commission for England and Wales (2005) Ninth Programme of Law Reform. Law Commission, London
Law Commission for England and Wales, Sharing Homes: A Discussion Paper (London: Law Commission, 2002)
Lewis J. (2001) The End of Marriage? Individualism and Intimate Relationships. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Miles J. (2003) “Property Law vs. Family Law: Resolving the Problems of Family Property”. Legal Studies 23(4):624–648
Morgan P. (1999) Marriage-Lite: The Rise of Cohabitation and its Consequences. Institute for the Study of Civil Society, London
O’Donovan K. (1993) Family Law Matters. Pluto Press, London
Office for National Statistics, Social Trends 35 (2005)
Probert R. (2001) From Lack of Status to Contract: Assessing the French Pacte Civil de Solidarité. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 23(3):257–269
Probert R. (2004) “Cohabitation in Twentieth Century England and Wales: Law and Policy”. Law and Policy 26(1):13–32
Scottish Law Commission (1992) Report on Family Law (Scots Law Com No 135). The Stationery Office, Edinburgh
Shaw C., Haskey J. (1999) “New Estimates and Projections of the Population Cohabiting in England and Wales”. Population Trends 95:7–17
Smart C., Stevens P. (2000) Cohabitation Breakdown. PSI, London
Thornes B., Collard J. (1979) Who Divorces? Routledge, London
Wong S. (2003) “Trusting in Trust(s): The Family Home and Human Rights”. Feminist Legal Studies 11(2):119–137
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barlow, A. Cohabitation Law Reform – Messages From Research. Feminist Legal Stud 14, 167–180 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-006-9026-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-006-9026-x