Feminist Legal Studies

, Volume 14, Issue 1, pp 53–77 | Cite as


Review article


Ratna Kapur’s recent book entitled Erotic Justice proposes a new politics of postcolonialism whereby the sexual subaltern disrupts the normative principles of the universal, liberal, legal domain. Kapur traces legal strategies regarding censorship, sex-work, homosexuality, sexual harassment, trafficking and migration which travel a treacherous path, countering allegations of ‘unIndian’ and Western practice with cultural histories of ‘authentic’ sexual legitimacies, towards a new politics of desire. Kapur frames her analysis through postcolonial feminist theory as providing a tool for feminist struggle, yet distinct from and disruptive of a liberal project of global sisterhood. This review deeply values the role of the sexual subaltern which disrupts the tenets of a linear, progressive liberalism. Drawing upon Indian feminist and Western feminist perspectives, the review considers how the distinct position of the postcolonial sexual subaltern subject informs the generic role of law as a tool constructing relations of domination regarding gender, sexuality, caste, property and religion. Kapur observes that both the West and the Hindu Right have engaged with liberal legal principles. This engagement, I argue, exposes and informs law as a historical and contemporary tool of gendered legal colonialism, for sisters to disrupt across the Western and Eastern terrains.


colonialism cultural relativism feminist theory homosexuality human rights postcolonialism sex-work sexual subaltern trafficking transnational migrant universalism 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Agnes F. (1999). Law and Gender Inequality. O.U.P., Oxford DelhiGoogle Scholar
  2. Benhabib S. et al. (1995). Feminist Contentions, a Philosophical Exchange. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Benhabib, S., The Claims of Culture, Equality and Diversity in the Global Era (Princeton University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
  4. Bibbings L. (1995). “Female Circumcision: Mutilation or Modification?”. In: Bridgeman J., Millns S. (eds). Law and Body Politics. Dartmouth, Aldershot, pp. 151–170Google Scholar
  5. Buss, E.D. & Herman, D., Globalising Family Values: The Christian Right in International Politics (University of Minnesota, 2003)Google Scholar
  6. Charlesworth H., Chinkin C. (2000). The Boundaries of International Law, a Feminist Analysis. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  7. Chatterjee P. (1993). The Nation and Its Fragments: Colonial and Postcolonial Histories. Princeton UP, Ewing, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  8. Coomeraswamy R. (1994). “To Bellow like a Cow: Women, Ethnicity and the Discourse of Rights”. In: Cook R. (eds). Human Rights of Women, National and International Perspectives. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 39–57Google Scholar
  9. Coomaraswamy, R., “Cultural Practices in the Family that are Violent Towards Women”, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women, E/CN.4/2002/83, (31 January 2002)Google Scholar
  10. Fitzpatrick P., Darian-Smith E. (1999). Laws of the Postcolonial. University of Michigan Press, MichiganGoogle Scholar
  11. Geetha V. (1998). “Women and an Ethnic of Citizenship”. Economic and Political Weekly 33/17:WS-9–WS-15Google Scholar
  12. John, M., “Alternative Modernities? Reservations and Women’s Movement in 20th Century India”, Economic and Political Weekly (2000), WS-2–WS-31Google Scholar
  13. Kalpagam U. (2002). “Perspectives for a Grassroots Feminist Theory”. Economic and Political Weekly 35(43–44):4686–4693Google Scholar
  14. Kapur R. (2005). Erotic Justice, Law and the New Politics of Postcolonialism. Glasshouse Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Kapur R., Cossman B. (1996). Subversive Sites. Sage, New Delhi LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Kishwar M. (1994). Film Review The Bandit Queen. Manushi 84:34–37Google Scholar
  17. Mahmood S. (2001). “Feminist Theory, Embodiment and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival”. Cultural Anthropology 16/2:202–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Majumdar, R., “History of Women’s Rights: A Non-Historicist Reading”, Economic and Political Weekly (2003), E.P.W. Perspectives, 72–82Google Scholar
  19. Marchand M.H., Runyan A.S. (2002). Gender and Global Restructuring, Sightings, Sites and Resistances. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Menon N. (1998). “State/Gender/Community, Citizenship in Contemporary India”. Economic and Political Weekly 33/5:PE-3–PE-10Google Scholar
  21. Mohanty C. (1998). “Under Western Eyes: Feminism Scholarship and Colonial Discourses”. Feminist Review 30:61–68Google Scholar
  22. Nanda M. (1997). “‘History is What Hurts’: A Materialist Feminist Perspective on the Green Revolution and its Ecofeminist Critics”. In: Hennessy R., Ingraham C. (eds). Materialist Feminism, A Reader in Class, Difference and Women’s Lives. Routledge, London/New York, pp. 364–394Google Scholar
  23. Nussbaum M.C. (1999). Sex and Social Justice. OUP, Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Rao A. (eds). (2003). Gender and Caste. Kali for Women, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  25. Rege S. (1998). “Dalit Women Talk Differently: A Critique of ‘Difference’ and Towards a Dalit Feminist Standpoint Position”. Economic and Political Weekly 33/44:WS-39–WS-46Google Scholar
  26. Rege S. (2000). “‘Real Feminism’ and Dalit Women: Scripts of Denial and Accusation”. Economic and Political Weekly 35/6:492–495Google Scholar
  27. Rege S. (2003). Sociology of Gender, The Challenge of Feminist Sociological Knowledge. Sage, New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Roy A. (2001). “Community, Women Citizens and a Women’s Politics”. Economic and Political Weekly 36/17:1441–1447Google Scholar
  29. Sarkar T. (1996). “Colonial Lawmaking and Lives/Deaths of Indian Women: Different Reading of Law and Community”. In: Kapur R. (eds). Feminist Terrains in Legal Domains, Interdisciplinary Essays on Women and Law in India. Kali for Women, New Delhi, pp. 210–242Google Scholar
  30. Sen, A., Commodities and Capabilities (Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
  31. Setalvad, T., “How Textbooks Teach Prejudice”, Combat Communalism, 15 June 2003 (countercurrents.org, accessed 11.11.2005)Google Scholar
  32. Smart C. (1985). Law, Crime and Sexuality, Essays in Feminism. Sage, London, Thousand Oaks, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  33. Spivak G. (1988). “Can the Subaltern Speak?”. In: Nelson N., Grossberg L. (eds). Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Illinois UP, Chicago, pp. 271–316Google Scholar
  34. Vanita R. (eds). (2002). Queering India: Same-Sex Love and Eroticism in Indian Culture and Society. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Weait M. (2005). Criminal Law and the Sexual Transmission of HIV: R v. Dica. Modern Law Review 68/1:121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Law DepartmentUniversity of KeeleKeeleUK

Personalised recommendations