Feminism and the Gender Recognition Act 2004

Abstract

This paper argues, first, that the legal construction of transsexualism is a matter of interest, not only to members of the trans community, but to all students of gender, including feminists. The paper then proceeds to explain and analyse, using feminist perspectives, key aspects of the Gender Recognition Act 2004 in the light of the recent caselaw concerning the rights of trans persons. The 2004 Act, it is argued, is a conservative move, which attempts to deny the threat transsexualism poses to the binary system of gender, by instigating a system to formally ‘recognise’ only men and or women. However, the way in which the Act constructs the public/private divide and the mind/body relation carries potential for legal recognition of subject positions which may in a variety of ways be ‘beyond’ the binary system that is currently orthodox. The paper can as such be read as a case study in the legal (re)construction of gender, the gender/sex relation, and the widespread tendency to construct gender conservatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. M. Bell (2004) ArticleTitle‘‘A Hazy Concept of Equality, Case C-117/01 KB v NHS Pensions Agency and Secretary of State for Health, European Court of Justice, 7 January 2004’‘ Feminist Legal Studies 12/2 223–231 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:FEST.0000043339.80855.77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Butler (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex” Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. Califia (1997) Sex Changes: The Politics of Transgenderism Cleis Press San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Collier (2000) “Straight Families, Queer Lives? Heterosexual(izing) Family Law” C. Stychin D. Herman (Eds) Sexuality in the Legal Arena The Athlone Press London

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Cowan (2004) ArticleTitle“‘That Woman is a Woman!’ The Case of Bellinger v. Bellinger and the Mysterious (Dis)appearance of Sex” Feminist Legal Studies 12/1 79–92 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:FEST.0000026121.18280.d0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S Beauvoir Particlede (1953) The Second Sex Alfred A.Knopf/Harmondsworth New York, Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  7. Department of Constitutional Affairs, Response to the Joint Committee on Human Rights Nineteenth Report of Session 2002–2003 Draft Gender Recognition Bill (London: Department of Constitutional Affairs, 2003)

  8. J. Derrida (1981) Positions University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  9. House of Lords and House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights, Draft Gender Recognition Bill Nineteenth Report of Session 2002–2003, H.L. Paper 118-I, H.C. 1276-I. (London: The Stationery Office, 2003)

  10. S. Jeffreys (1998) “Heterosexuality and the Desire for Gender” D. Richardson (Eds) Theorising Heterosexuality Open University Press Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Raymond (1998) “Sappho by Surgery: the Transsexually Constructed Lesbian-Feminist” P.D. Hopkins (Eds) Sex/Machine: Readings in Culture and Technology University Press Bloomington, IN: Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  12. H Rubin (2003) Self-Made Men: Identity and Embodiment among Transsexual Men Vanderbilt University Press Nashville

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Sharpe (2002) ArticleTitle“English Transgender Law Reform and the Spectre of Corbett” Feminist Legal Studies 10/1 65–89 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1014913430147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A., Sharpe (2002) Transgender Jurisprudence: Dysphoric Bodies of Law Cavendish London

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Sandland (1998) ArticleTitle“Seeing Double, Or, Why ‘To Be or Not To Be’ is (Not) The Question For Feminist Legal Studies” Social and Legal Studies 7 IssueID3 307–338

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. Sandland (2003) ArticleTitle“Crossing and Not Crossing: Gender, Sexuality and Melancholy in the European Court of Human Rights” Feminist Legal Studies 11/2 191–209 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1025031126520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Whittle (2002) Respect and Equality: Transsexual and Transgender Rights London Cavendish

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph Sandland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sandland, R. Feminism and the Gender Recognition Act 2004. Feminist Legal Stud 13, 43–66 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-005-1456-3

Download citation

Key words

  • feminist theory
  • fluidity of gender
  • gender recognition
  • sex discrimination
  • social inclusion/exclusion
  • transsexualism