National evaluation of NHS genetics service investments: emerging issues from the cancer genetics pilots
- 98 Downloads
In seeking to fulfil the ambition of the 2003 genetics white paper, Our Inheritance, Our Future, to ‘mainstream’ genetic knowledge and practices, the Department of Health provided start-up funding for pilot services in various clinical areas. These included seven cancer genetics projects, co-funded with Macmillan Cancer Support. To help to understand the challenges encountered by such an attempt at reconfiguring the organization and delivery of services in this field, a programme-level evaluation of the genetics projects was commissioned to consider the organizational issues faced. Using a qualitative approach, this research has involved comparative case-study work in 11 of the pilot sites, including four of the seven cancer genetics pilots. In this paper, the researchers present early findings from their work, focusing in particular on the cancer genetics pilots. They consider some of the factors that have influenced how the pilots have sought to address pre-existing sector, organizational and professional boundaries to these new ways of working. The article examines the relationship between these factors and the extent to which pilots have succeeded in setting up boundary-spanning services, dealing with human-resource issues and creating sustainable, ‘mainstreamed’ provision which attracts ongoing funding in a volatile National Health Service commissioning environment where funding priorities do not always favour preventive, risk-assessment services.
KeywordsService delivery and organization Change management Cancer Genetics Human resources Commissioning NHS England
- 1.Secretary of State for Health (2003) Our inheritance, our future: realising the potential of genetics in the NHS. The Stationery Office, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 2.Secretary of State for Health (2000) The NHS plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 10.Yin R (1994) Case study research and methods. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 11.McIntosh A, Shaw C, Evans G, Turnbull N, Bahar N, Barclay M, Easton D, Emery J, Gray J, Halpin J, Hopwood P, McKay J, Sheppard C, Sibbering M, Watson W, Wailoo A, Hutchinson A (2004; updated 2006) Clinical guidelines and evidence review for the classification and care of women at risk of familial breast cancer. London: National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care/University of Sheffield. NICE guideline CG014. www.nice.org.ukGoogle Scholar